SUBJECT-OBJECT RELATIONS IN THE SOCIAL GOVERNANCE SYSTEM: CHINESE SOCIOLOGISTS APPROACHES

Authors

Keywords:

Networks, flows, social governance, China, subject of governance, object of governance, Chinese sociology

Abstract

Introduction. The relevance of this study is related and explained by the fact that contemporary sociology is showing growing interest in the transition from the traditional “subject-object” model of governance to more complex forms of interaction. In China, this process has its own regional feature: the borrowing of global governance concepts is combined with the preservation of the leading role of party-state institutions and reliance on traditional views of the governance process. The aim of the article is to identify and systematize the approaches of Chinese sociologists to understanding subject-object relations within the system of social governance.

Materials and Methods. The theoretical and methodological framework of the study is based on the concept of augmented sociality and a transdisciplinary regional approach. The empirical basis for the qualitative text analysis consists of 110 sociological dissertations on the topic of social governance, selected through comprehensive sampling from the CNKI database and completed in mainland China from 2000 to the present.

Results and conclusions. The study has revealed that contemporary mainland Chinese sociology has developed three groups of approaches to the problem of subject-object relations in the system of social governance: statist-oriented, society-oriented, and “intermediate” statist-society approaches. The first group maintains a focus on institutions and interactions; in this group, the main subject of governance is the party and the state, while society is interpreted primarily as the object of governance. The second group concentrates on processes of social self-organization and the participation of non-state actors; it attempts to take into account the characteristics of the social beyond institutions and interactions alone. The third group of approaches, currently the most in demand, proposes recognizing the leading role of party-state institutions while partially incorporating various local communities, public organizations, and citizens into governance processes, taking into account new characteristics of the social, namely networks and flows.

Discussion. Chinese sociology is developing a hybrid model of social governance that combines the concepts of “subject-object” and “subject-subject.” This model is intended to integrate traditional Chinese approaches based on institutional influence with the achievements of global governance concepts, taking into account horizontal social ties and the dynamic development of contemporary society, as well as its constant mobility and changeability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Evgeny V. Kremnyov , Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

    Evgeny V. Kremnyov – Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Associate Professor; Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University (236041, Russia, Kaliningrad, A. Nevskogo St., 14) – Head of the Academic and Methodological Unit for Oriental Studies; kremnyov2005@yandex.ru. SPIN 9597-5548, ORCID 0000-0001-5255-3772, Scopus 57211607591, Researcher Q-4396-2018.

  • Pavel P. Deriugin , Saint Petersburg State University

    Pavel P. Deriugin – Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Professor; Saint Petersburg State University (199034, Russia, Saint Petersburg, Universitetskaya Emb., 7-9) – Head of the Department of Economic Sociology; Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (190005, Russia, Saint Petersburg, 7th Krasnoarmeyskaya St., 25/14) – Head of the Russian-Chinese Center for Interdisciplinary Research; Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University (197022, Russia, Saint Petersburg, Professora Popova St., 5) – Professor of the Department of Sociology and Political Science; deriuginpav@yandex.ru. SPIN 7816-6709, ORCID 0000-0002-5380-8498, Scopus 57205375761, Researcher AFJ-7283-2022.

  • Liubov A. Lebedintseva , Saint Petersburg State University

    Liubov A. Lebedintseva – Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Professor; Saint Petersburg State University (199034, Russia, Saint Petersburg, Universitetskaya Emb., 7-9) – Professor of the Department of Economic Sociology; Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (190005, Russia, Saint Petersburg, 7th Krasnoarmeyskaya St., 25/14) – Associate Research Fellow, Russian-Chinese Center for Interdisciplinary Research; llebedintseva879@gmail.com. SPIN 1996-9779, ORCID 0000-0002-9458-4689, Scopus 56820216100, Researcher I-7256-2013.

  • Olga V. Kuznetsova , Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

    Olga V. Kuznetsova – Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor; Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University (236041, Russia, Kaliningrad, A. Nevskogo St., 14) – Research Associate Professor, Head of the Research Group in Transdisciplinary Regionology; kuznetsova1@mail.ru. SPIN 9800-9784, ORCID 0000-0002-9895-0471, Scopus 57222491780, Researcher CAA-6961-2022.

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

Social management

How to Cite

Kremnyov , E. V. ., Deriugin , P. P. ., Lebedintseva , L. A. ., & Kuznetsova , O. V. . (2026). SUBJECT-OBJECT RELATIONS IN THE SOCIAL GOVERNANCE SYSTEM: CHINESE SOCIOLOGISTS APPROACHES. Management Issues, 20(3), 38-53. https://journal-management.com/main/article/view/310