DESIGNING THE DEVELOPMENTOF A CLOSED ADMINISTRATIVE TERRITORIAL ENTITY (CATE) BASED ON EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL IDENTITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2022-4-75-87Keywords:
проектирование ЗАТО, проектный город, проектный подход, ценностное ядро вовлеченности, социальная идентичность городаAbstract
The article presents an analysis of the results of the author's empirical research to identify social identity and its significance in designing the development of a closed administrative-territorial entity (CATE). The relevance of the sociological analysis of CATE in the context of the methodology of the project approach is substantiated, the author's conclusions and recommendations are made regarding the directions for the de‐ velopment of this type of project cities. The project approach, which is based on the principles, elements and concepts of the theory of social management, was used as the main research method. The project nature of the organization and development of CATE can be manifested through an analysis of the assessments and opinions of its residents, the key actors in relationships in the urban environment. In this regard, the study used field methods of sociological analysis: a questionnaire survey and a semi-formalized interview. It has been established that it is also necessary to evaluate the problems and propose solutions in the context of the design features of the urban environment, the dynamics and problems of the development of relationships between key actors. In the article, the author uses his own concept of the project city as a sociological typo‐
logy, which allows looking at the nature of the origin, features and directions of development of this specific local society in a fundamentally different context. Social identity is formed, in many respects, on the basis of the value core of the involvement of subjects and actors of management (residents, management of the city- forming enterprise, administration, public activists, etc.), which is an integral part of the CATE project. On the basis of the research data, the author comes to the conclusion that involvement remains as part of the value core of identity, however, not in the active phase. For the most part, relations between key subjects and actors of the urban environment are fragmented and atomized.
References
1. Schlichtman J.J. (2020). Big City Problems: Private Equity Investment, Transnational Users, and Local Mobilization in the Small City, City & Community, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 98–131. DOI: 10.1111/ cico.12450.
2. Fabusuyi T., Johnson M.P. (2021). Enhancing the quality and social impacts of urban plan‐ ning through community-engaged operations re‐ search, Environment and Planning B: Urban Ana‐ lytics and City Science. October. DOI: 10.1177/ 23998083211054851.
3. Ogutu F.A., Kimata D.M., Kweyu R.M. (2021). Partnerships for sustainable cities as options for improving solid waste management in Nairobi city, Waste Management & Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 25–31. DOI: 10.1177/0734242X20967735.
4. Khripunov I., Katsva M. (2002). Russia’s Nu‐ clear Industry: The Next Generation, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 51–57. DOI: 10.2968/058002015.
5. Wolfsthal J.B. (2001). Russia: Surveying the Nuclear Cities, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 15–17. DOI: 10.2968/057004005.
6. Cugurullo F. (2018). Exposing smart cities and eco-cities: Frankenstein urbanism and the sustain‐ ability challenges of the experimental city, Environ‐ ment and Planning A: Economy and Space, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 73–92. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X17738535.
7. Gardner N., Hespanhol L. (2017). SMLXL: Scaling the smart city, from metropolis to individ‐ ual, City, Culture and Society. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccs. 2017.06.006.
8. Irazábal C., Jirón P. (2021). Latin American smart cities: Between worlding infatuation and crawl‐ ing provincialising, Urban Studies, vol. 58, no. 3,
pp. 507–534. DOI: 10.1177/0042098020945201.
9. Charnock G., March H., Ribera-Fumaz R. (2021). From smart to rebel city? Worlding, provin‐ cialising and the Barcelona model, Urban Studies, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 581–600.
10. Jameson S., Richter C., Taylor L. (2019). People’s strategies for perceived surveillance in Amsterdam Smart City, Urban Geography, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1467–1484.
11. Толстиков В.С. Социокультурная среда закрытых городов Урала // Вестник ЮУрГУ. Серия: Социально-гуманитарные науки. 2012.
№ 10 (269). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/ n/sotsiokulturnaya-sreda-zakrytyh-gorodov- urala (дата обращения: 16.03.2022).
12. Хандожко Р.И. Территория политической аномалии: партийная жизнь в советском атомном городе 1950–1960-х годов // Шаги/ Steps. 2016. № 1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/ article/n/territoriya-politicheskoy-anomalii- partiynaya-zhizn-v-sovetskom-atomnom-gorode-1950-1960-h-godov-1 (дата обращения: 16.03.2022).
13. Лазаренко В.А. Социальное развитие го‐ родов атомной электроэнергетики России (на примере Десногорска) // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета. Серия: По‐ литические, социологические и экономические науки. 2018. № 1 (7). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/ article/n/sotsialnoe-razvitie-gorodov-atomnoy- elektroenergetiki-rossii-na-primere-desnogorska (дата обращения: 16.03.2022).
14. Rhodes R. (2015). Why the Manhattan Project should be preserved, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 4–10. DOI: 10.1177/
0096340215611077.
15. Зверев А.И., Карачков С.М. Уральские закрытые города на пути выхода из кризиса: поиск социальных корней проблематики // ИСОМ. 2012. № 3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/ article/n/uralskie-zakrytye-goroda-na-puti- vyhoda-iz-krizisa-poisk-sotsialnyh-korney- problematiki (дата обращения: 16.03.2022).
16. Росатом в 2021 году направил более 300 миллионов рублей на развитие инфраструктуры Новоуральска // Новости портала «Атомная энергия 2.0.». 2022. 16 марта. URL: https:// www.atomic-energy.ru/news/2022/03/16/122864.
17. Карачков С.М. Развитие модели социального управления Уральским «Атомным» зато на современном этапе // Теория и практика общественного развития. 2013. № 12. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/razvitie-modeli- sotsialnogo-upravleniya-uralskim-atomnym- zato-na-sovremennom-etape (дата обращения: 16.03.2022).
18. Steenbergen B. (2018). The condition of Citizenship: An Introdution. SAGE.
19. Амантаев А.А. Проблемы в теории управления проектами // Экономика и управление. 2017. № 3. С. 46–53.
20. Маковкина С.А., Трофимова О.М. Внедрение стандартов управления проектами в государственном и муниципальном управлении // Вопросы управления. 2016. № 4. URL: https:// journal-management.com/issue/2016/04/07.
21. Королева Е.Н., Шептухина Л.И., Шеп‐ тухин А.Н. Современные стратегии развития городов / под ред. Л. И. Шептухиной. СПб. : Инфо-да, 2017. 214 c.
22. Костин В.А., Костина Н.Б. Стратегический менеджмент. Екатеринбург : УрАГС, 2007. 167 с.
23. Костина Н.Б., Дуран Т.В., Калугина Н.М. Теория управления. М. : Инфра-М, 2017. 256 с.
24. Костин В.А. Теория управления. Екатеринбург : УрАГС, 2001. 217 с.
25. Карачков С.М. Развитие модели социального управления уральским «атомным» ЗАТО на современном этапе // Теория и практика общественного развития. 2013. № 12. URL: http://teoria-practica.ru/vipusk-12-2013 (дата обращения: 13.10.2021).
26. Зверев А.И., Карачков С.М. Атомный ЗАТО как особый тип моногорода: перспективы и проблемы развития // Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Серия: Социология. Политология. 2021. № 2. URL: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/atomnyy-zato-kak- osobyy-tip-monogoroda-perspektivy-i-problemy- razvitiya (дата обращения: 13.10.2021).
27. Черновая версия сборника по истории овладения атомной энергией в СССР. № 350.
28. Атомный проект СССР: Документы и материалы. В 3 т. / Под общ. ред. Л. Д. Рябева. М.–Саров, 1998–2010.
29. Мельникова Н.В. «Атомная» идентичность жителей закрытых атомных городов России // Ученые записки ОГУ. Серия: Гуманитарные и социальные науки. 2019. № 3 (84). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/atomnaya- identichnost-zhiteley-zakr y tyh-atomnyh- gorodov-rossii (дата обращения: 20.02.2022).
30. Зверев А.И., Карачков С.М. Корпоративная модель социального управления атомным ЗАТО: основания теоретической реконструкции // Управленец. 2012. № 9-10. URL: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/korporativnaya-model- sotsialnogo-upravleniya-atomnym-zato- osnovaniya-teoreticheskoy-rekonstruktsii ( дата обращения: 13.10.2021).
REFERENCES
1. Schlichtman J.J. (2020). Big City Problems: Private Equity Investment, Transnational Users, and Local Mobilization in the Small City, City & Com‐ munity, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 98–131. DOI: 10.1111/ cico.12450.
2. Fabusuyi T., Johnson M.P. (2021). Enhanc‐ ing the quality and social impacts of urban plan‐ ning through community-engaged operations re‐ search, Environment and Planning B: Urban Ana‐ lytics and City Science. October. DOI: 10.1177/ 23998083211054851.
3. Ogutu F.A., Kimata D.M., Kweyu R.M. (2021). Partnerships for sustainable cities as options for improving solid waste management in Nairobi city, Waste Management & Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 25–31. DOI: 10.1177/0734242X20967735.
4. Khripunov I., Katsva M. (2002). Russia’s Nu‐ clear Industry: The Next Generation, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 51–57. DOI: 10.2968/058002015.
5. Wolfsthal J.B. (2001). Russia: Surveying the Nuclear Cities, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 15–17. DOI: 10.2968/057004005.
6. Cugurullo F. (2018). Exposing smart cities and eco-cities: Frankenstein urbanism and the sustain‐ ability challenges of the experimental city, Environ‐ ment and Planning A: Economy and Space, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 73–92. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X17738535.
7. Gardner N., Hespanhol L. (2017). SMLXL: Scaling the smart city, from metropolis to individ‐ ual, City, Culture and Society. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccs. 2017.06.006.
8. Irazábal C., Jirón P. (2021). Latin American smart cities: Between worlding infatuation and crawl‐ ing provincialising, Urban Studies, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 507–534. DOI: 10.1177/0042098020945201.
9. Charnock G., March H., Ribera-Fumaz R. (2021). From smart to rebel city? Worlding, provin‐ cialising and the Barcelona model, Urban Studies, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 581–600.
10. Jameson S., Richter C., Taylor L. (2019). People’s strategies for perceived surveillance in Amsterdam Smart City, Urban Geography, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1467–1484.
11. Tolstikov V.S. (2012). The sociocultural environment of the closed cities of the Urals, Bul‐ letin of the SUSU. Series: Socio-Humanities, no. 10
(269). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ sotsiokulturnaya-sreda-zakrytyh-gorodov-urala (accessed 16.03.2022).
12. Handozhko R.I. (2016). The territory of the political anomaly: party life in the Soviet nuc‐ lear city of the 1950-1960s, Steps, no. 1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/territoriya- politicheskoy-anomalii-partiynaya-zhizn-v- sovetskom-atomnom-gorode-1950-1960-h- godov-1 16.03.2022).
13. Lazarenko V.A. (2018). Social development of the cities of nuclear power industry in Russia (on the example of Desnogorsk), Bulletin of Kem‐ erovo State University. Series: Political, sociological and economic sciences, no. 1 (7). URL: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialnoe-razvitie- gorodov-atomnoy-elektroenergetiki-rossii-na- primere-desnogorska (accessed 16.03.2022).
14. Rhodes R. (2015). Why the Manhattan Project should be preserved, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 4–10. DOI: 10.1177/
0096340215611077.
15. Zverev A.I., Karachkov S.M.(2012). Uralclosed cities on the way of leaving the crisis: search for social roots of problems, ISOM, no. 3. URL: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/uralskie-zakrytye- goroda-na-puti-vyhoda-iz-krizisa-poisk-sotsialnyh- korney-problematiki (accessed 16.03.2022).
16. Rosatom in 2021 allocated more than 300 million rubles to develop the infrastructure of No‐ vouralsk, News of the portal “Atomic Anegria 2.0.” 2022. March, 16. URL: https://www.atomic-energy.ru/ news/2022/03/16/122864.
17. Karachkov S.M. (2013). The development of the model of social management of the Ural “nuclear” closed cities at the present stage, Theory and practice of social development, no. 12. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/razvitie- modeli-sotsialnogo-upravleniya-uralskim- atomnym-zato-na-sovremennom-etape (accessed 16.03.2022).
18. Steenbergen B. (2018). The condition of Citizenship: An Introdution. SAGE.
19. Amantaev A.A. (2017). Problems in the the‐ ory of project management, Economics and Man‐ agement, no. 3, pp. 46–53.
20. Makovkina S.A., Trofimova O.M. (2016). Implementation of project management standards in state and municipal management, Management Issues, no. 4. URL: https://journal-management.com/ issue/2016/04/07.
21. Koroleva E.N., Sheptukhina L.I., Sheptu‐ khin A.N. (2017). Modern cities development strategies. Saint Petersburg: Info-da. 214 p.
22. Kostin V.A., Kostina N.B. (2007). Strategic management. Ekaterinburg: UAPA. 167 p.
23. Kostina N.B., Duran T.V., Kalugina N.M. (2017). Managementtheory. Moscow: Infra-M. 256 p.
24. Kostin V.A. (2001). Management theory. Ekaterinburg: UAPA. 217 p.
25. Karachkov S.M. (2013). The development of the model of social management of the Ural “nuclear” closed cities at the present stage, Theory and practice of social development, no. 12. url: http:// teoria-practica.ru/vipusk-12-2013 (accessed 13.10.2021).
26. Zverev A.I., Karachkov S.M. (2021). Nuc‐ lear closed city as a special type of single-industry town: prospects and problems of development, Iz‐ vestia of the University of Saratov. New series. Series: Sociology. Political science, no. 2. URL: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/atomnyy-zato-kak- os ob y y-tip-monogoro da-p ersp ek t i v y-i- problemy-razvitiya (accessed 13.10.2021).
27. The draft version of the collection on the history of the mastery of atomic energy in the USSR, no. 350.
28. Nuclear project of the USSR: Documents and materials. In 3 vols. Edited by L. D. Ryabev. Moscow, Sarov, 1998–2010.
29. Melnikova N.V. (2019). The “nuclear” identity of the inhabitants of the closed atomic cit‐ ies of Russia, Scientific Notes of the OSU. Series: Humanitarian and social sciences, no. 3 (84). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/atomnaya- identichnost-zhiteley-zakr y tyh-atomnyh- gorodov-rossii (accessed 20.02.2022).
30. Zverev A.I., Karachkov S.M. (2012). The corporate model of the social management of atomic closed cities: the base for theoretical reconstruction, The Manager, no. 9-10. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/ article/n/korporativnaya-model-sotsialnogo- upravleniya-atomny m-zato-osnovaniya- teoreticheskoy-rekonstruktsii (accessed 13.10.2011).
