NEW IMPERATIVES OF THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL MANAGEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2021-1-23-33Keywords:
social state, socialization of state, etatisation of society, sustainable development of society, social and political sustainability, modeling of social processes, COVID-crisis, infodemic, sociological monitoring, social and political management.Abstract
The article examines the current problems of the life of a modern social state. The global society and the Russian civil society and state are affected by the ongoing process of socialization of the state and etatisation of society, which means establishment of a social state governed by the rule of law and a civil society, development of the basis of legal knowledge and jurisprudence and foundation of institutions managing sustainable development of the global civilization. In the course of this process, two logics of actions collide: the logic of dogmatic speculative liberalism, “domination over nature”, war against the nature for the sake of elimination of poverty and support of well-being of the minority and a new logic of scientific balance of coexistence of person, society and nature for the sustainable development of the majority of people. It is argued that Russian society and the state have begun to manifest socio-political imperatives, following which it might become possible to facilitate social integration of the Russian society into the processes of sustainable development. During the COVID-19 crisis, the state and the civil society have faced challenges of the new reality. In order to adequately respond to these challenges and develop a coordinated attitude to resist the threat of the pandemic, citizens must be confident in the reliability of the information they receive about the coronavirus from various sources and be able to evaluate the media’s judgments about the pandemic. Theoretical propositions are illustrated and confirmed by the data of sociological research. The article presents the results of the sociological monitoring “How are you, Russia?”, conducted under the scientific supervision of Doctor of Social Sciences V. K. Levashov since 1992. The author shows the methods and results of empirical modeling of socio-political stability.
References
1. Bauman Z. (2005). 44 Letters from the Liquid Modern World. Cambridge: Polity.
2. Krastev I. (2013). In Mistrust We Trust: Can Democracy Survive When We Don’t Trust Our Leaders? New York: TED Books. 71 p.
3. Дуткевич П., Казаринова Д.Б. (2017). Ко- нец эпохи глобализации: причины и последствия // Вестник РУДН. Серия: Политология.
№ 1. С. 7–14.
4. Иванов Д.В. (2020). Дополненная современность: эффекты постглобализации и поствиртуализации // Социологические исследования.
№ 5. С. 44–55.
5. Lieven A. (2020). The Coronavirus Holds Up a Mirror to Existing Societies: What Will They See? Russia In Global Affairs, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 15–18. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-2-15-18.
6. Bratersky M. (2020). International Life after the Pandemic, Russia In Global Affairs, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 19–25. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-2- 19-25.
7. Чумаков А.Н., Юрченко П.С. (2020). Коронавирус и глобализация: знание vs. домыслы // Евразийская интеграция: экономика, право, политика. № 3. С. 112–122.
8. Старостина И.А. (2020). Общероссийское голосование в контексте конституционных поправок 2020 года // Конституционное и муниципальное право. № 8. С. 18–23.
9. Рязанцев С.В., Иванов В.Н. (2020). Великая Победа советского народа: социально-политические и демографические аспекты : Монография / Отв. ред. С.В. Рязанцев, В.Н. Ива- нов ; ИСПИ ФНИСЦ РАН. М. : Изд-во «Экон-Информ». 450 с.
10. Голубицкий Ю.А. (2020). «Пятая колонна» и её вдохновители в попытках оболгать великую Победу // Человеческий капитал. № 5 (137). С. 11–26.
11. Francis Fukuyama. (2020). The Pandemic and Political Order, Foreign Affairs. URL: https://www. foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2020-06-09/pan demic-and-political-order (accessed 01.01.2021).
12. Катасонов В.Ю. (2020). От вируса к диктатуре. М. : Изд-во «Книжный мир». 480 с.
13. Недель А. (2020) Панмедиа. CОVID-19, люди и политика. СПб. : Издательство «Алетейя». ISBN 978-5-00165-126-0. 220 с.
14. Левашов В.К., Великая Н.М., Шушпанова И.С., Афанасьев В.А., Гребняк О.В., Новожени- на О.П. (2020). Экспресс-информация. Как живешь, Россия? 50 этап социологического мониторинга, август-сентябрь 2020 года / Под общей редакцией В.К. Левашова. М. : Перспектива. 62 с.
15. Johnson Christine K., Hitchens Peta L., Pandit Pranav S., Rushmore Julie, Evans Tierra Smiley, Young Cristin C. W. and Doyle Megan M. (2020). Global shifts in mammalian population trends reveal key predictors of virus spillover risk. Royal Society Publishing. Proc. R. Soc. B.28720192736.
16. Alessandro Blasimme, Effy Vayena. (2020). What’s next for COVID-19 apps? Governance and oversight. Science, vol. 370, Iss. 6518, pp. 760–762.
17. Дайджест: Наука и борьба с COVID-19. Счетная палата Российской Федерации. Дайджест подготовлен Департаментом международного и регионального сотрудничества. URL: http s://ach.gov.ru/upload/pdf/Covid-19-science.pdf (дата обращения: 01.01.2021).
18. Стародубов В.И., Кадыров Ф.Н., Обухова О.В., Базарова И.Н., Ендовицкая Ю.В., Несветайло Н.Я. (2020). Российское здравоохранение на фоне коронавируса COVID-19: возможности и угрозы // Менеджер здравоохранения. № 5. С. 68–78.
19. Вильфредо Парето. (2017). Трансформация демократии / пер. с ит. М. А. Юсима. М. : РИ- ОР : ИНФРА-М. 154 с.
20. Барбашин М.Ю. (2011). Институциональная демократия и социальные дилеммы: опыт постсоветских трансформаций // Saarbrucken, Germany: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing. 168 c.
21. Фишман Л.Г. (2015). Создают ли демократию элиты? // Антиномии: Научный ежегодник Института философии и права УрО РАН. Т. 15. Вып. 2. С. 61–70.
22. Камышин А.С. (2016). Историческая трансформация элитарной власти в проблемном поле социальной философии // Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Серия Философия. Психология. Педагогика. № 2.
23. Левашов В.К. (2014). Социальное государство: исторический генезис и динамика становления в России // Социологические исследования. № 7. С. 32–46.
24. Левашов В.К. (2020). Диалектика и динамика взаимодействия гражданского общества и социального государства // Россия в XXI веке / под ред. Л. Е. Ильичевой, В. С. Комаровского. М. : Издательство «Аспект-пресс». С. 422–438.
25. Китаев С.В. (2017). Проблема политической стабильности и устойчивого развития российского государства // Научный вестник волгоградского филиала РАНХИГС. Серия «Политология и социология». № 2. С. 37–40.
26. Стратегия устойчивого развития в контексте политических процессов XXI столетия : Коллективная монография. Изд-во Московского университета, 2018. 320 с.
REFERENCES
1. Bauman Z. (2005). 44 Letters from the Liquid Modern World. Cambridge: Polity.
2. Krastev I. (2013). In Mistrust We Trust: Can Democracy Survive When We Don’t Trust Our Leaders? New York: TED Books. 71 p.
3. Dutkevich P., Kazarinova D.B. (2017). The end of the era of globalization: causes and consequences, Bulletin of RUDN. Series: Political Science, no. 1,
pp. 7–14.
4. Ivanov D.V. (2020). Augmented modernity: the effects of post-globalization and post-virtualization, Sociological Research, no. 5, pp. 44–55.
5. Lieven A. (2020). The Coronavirus Holds Up a Mirror to Existing Societies: What Will They See? Russia In Global Affairs, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 15–18. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-2-15-18.
6. Bratersky M. (2020). International Life after the Pandemic, Russia In Global Affairs, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 19–25. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-2- 19-25.
7. Chumakov A.N., Yurchenko P.S. (2020). Coronavirus and globalization: knowledge vs. speculation, Eurasian integration: economics, law, politics, no. 3, pp. 112–122.
8. Starostina I.A. (2020). Russian voting in the context of the 2020 constitutional amendments, Constitutional and municipal law, no. 8, pp. 18–23.
9. Ryazantsev S.V., Ivanov V.N. (2020). The Great Victory of the Soviet People: Socio-Political and Demographic Aspects. Moscow, Publishing house “Econ-Inform”. 450 p.
10. Golubitsky Yu.A. (2020). “The fifth column” and its inspirers in attempts to slander the great Victory, Human capital, no. 5 (137), pp. 11–26.
11. Francis Fukuyama. (2020). The Pandemic and Political Order, Foreign Affairs. URL: https://www. foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2020-06-09/pan demic-and-political-order (accessed 01.01.2021).
12. Katasonov V.Yu. (2020). From virus to dictatorship. Moscow, Publishing house “Book World”. 480 p.
13. Nedel A. (2020) Panmedia. COVID-19, people and politics. Saint-Petersburg, Publishing house “Aletheia”. ISBN 978-5-00165-126-0. 220 p.
14. Levashov V.K., Velikaya N.M., Shushpano- va I.S., Afanasyev V.A., Grebnyak O.V., Novozhenina O.P. (2020). Express information. How are you, Russia? In: Levashov V.K. (ed.). Stage 50 of sociological monitoring, August–September 2020. Moscow, Perspective. 62 p.
15. Johnson Christine K., Hitchens Peta L., Pan- dit Pranav S., Rushmore Julie, Evans Tierra Smiley, Young Cristin C. W. and Doyle Megan M. (2020). Global shifts in mammalian population trends reveal key predictors of virus spillover risk. Royal Society Publishing. Proc. R. Soc. B.28720192736.
16. Alessandro Blasimme, Effy Vayena. (2020). What’s next for COVID-19 apps? Governance and oversight. Science, vol. 370, Iss. 6518, pp. 760–762.
17. Digest: Science and the fight against COVID-
19. Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation (prepared by the Department of International and Regional Cooperation).
URL: https://ach.gov.ru/upload/pdf/Covid- 19 - science. pdf (accessed 01.01.2021).
18. Starodubov V.I., Kadyrov F.N., Obukhova O.V., Bazarova I.N., Endovitskaya Yu.V., Nesvetailo N.Ya. (2020). Russian healthcare against the back-drop of the COVID-19 coronavirus: opportunities and threats, Health Manager, no. 5, pp. 68–78.
19. Wilfredo Pareto. (2017). Transformation of Democracy. Moscow, RIOR, INFRA-M, 154 p.
20. Barbashin M.Yu. (2011). Institutional Democracy and Social Dilemmas: Experience of Post-Soviet Transformations, Saarbrucken, Germany, LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 168 p.
21. Fishman L.G. (2015). Are elites creating democracy? Antinomies: Scientific Yearbook of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 15, Iss. 2, pp. 61–70.
22. Kamyshin A.S. (2016). Historical transformation of elite power in the problem field of social philosophy, Izvestiya of the Saratov University. New series. Philosophy Series. Psychology. Pedagogy, no. 2.
23. Levashov V.K. (2014). Welfare state: historical genesis and dynamics of formation in Russia, Sociological research, no. 7, pp. 32–46.
24. Levashov V.K. (2020). Dialectics and dynamics of interaction between civil society and the social state. In: Ilyicheva L.E., Komarovsky V.S. (eds.). Russia in the XXI century. Moscow, Publishing house “Aspect-press”, pp. 422–438.
25. Kitaev S.V. (2017). The problem of political stability and sustainable development of the Russian state, Scientific bulletin of the Volgograd branch of RANEPA. Series “Political Science and Sociology”, no. 2, pp. 37–40.
26. Sustainable Development Strategy in the Context of Political Processes of the XXI Century. Publishing house of Moscow University, 2018, 320 p.
