INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL OF SCHOOLCHILDRENIN THE MIRROR OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2022-4-31-45Keywords:
education and economic development, human intellectual capital, expediency of international comparisons, formation of a creative class, humanistic component of the economyAbstract
Purpose: to identify the essential characteristics of human intellectual capital in the context of the emerging concept of the humanistic economy; identifying the features of its formation by comparing the educational achievements of schoolchildren studying in organizations of secondary general education (on the ex‐ ample of Russia and a number of developed foreign countries); the revealing of factors influencing the organization of the educational process and the quality of training of students.
Methodology and methods: based on the use of systemic and civilizational approaches, comparative and content analysis, methods of induction and deduction, logical comparison and expert assessments, an analysis of the educational achievements of students was carried out. The information basis was the results of periodically conducted international statistical surveys of the educational achievements of schoolchildren in the 4th and 8th grades. A comparative assessment of the literacy of 15-year-old students with details on reading, mathematical and natural science literacy was carried out. To find out the reasons for the differences between countries, the results obtained were compared with data on the volume of funding for education systems in different countries.
Results: in the countries selected for the study, a comparison was made of the educational achievements of students and the financial support of the education system at the levels of ISCED-2011. schoolchildren. The reasons hindering the formation of cognitive and socio-behavioral skills of schoolchildren, which are the result of insufficiently active development of skills for joint problem solving, have been identified. The identification of certain aspects that affect the formation and practical implementation of intellectual capital helped to identify the features of its accumulation, which are manifested in the objective aspirations of schoolchildren to acquire knowledge in various disciplines of the educational cycle. The value of the results of periodically conducted international surveys to measure the knowledge of students and the feasibility of their application in the study of the reproduction of intellectual capital has been confirmed. Based on the assessment of the effectiveness of the application of international test scores, the areas of application of the results obtained in order to improve the management of the education system are established.
Recommendations: Based on the analysis of the educational achievements of schoolchildren, the need to change approaches to the management of education as a special branch of the national economy that makes the main contribution to the formation and development of intellectual human capital is substantiated. Conclusions on the timeliness of updating state policy priorities and the wider application of methods and tools of macroeconomic and regional planning, the development of creative initiative at the municipal level of government, with a focus on improving the educational process in organizations of preschool, primary general, basic general and secondary general education (level 0 – ISCED 4 2011) are formulated. Recommendations for improving the organization of the educational process and improving the quality of training of students are presented.
References
1. Смирнов В.Т., Сошников И.В., Роман‐ чин В.И., Скоблякова И.В. Человеческий капитал: содержание и виды, оценка и стимулирование : Монография / под общ. ред. д.э.н., профессора В. Т. Смирнова. М. : Машиностроение-1, Орел: ОрелГТУ, 2005. 513 с.
2. Аникин В.А. Человеческий капитал: становление концепции и основные трактовки // Экономическая социология. 2017. Т. 18. № 4. Сентябрь. С. 120–156. DOI: 10.17323/1726-3247- 2017-4-120-156.
3. Козырев А.Н. Экономика интеллектуального капитала // Научные доклады. № 7(R). СПб. : НИИ менеджмента СПбГУ, 2006. 30 с.
4. Грузина Ю.М., Харчилава Х.П. Развитиe человеческого капитала в высокотехнологичных и наукоемких отраслях экономики // Гуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университета. 2021. Т. 11. № 6. С. 62–66. DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-6-62-66.
5. Лосева О.В., Абдикеев Н.М. Концепция человеческого интеллектуального капитала в условиях цифровизации экономики // Экономика. Налоги. Право. 2021. Т. 14. № 2. С. 72–83. DOI : 10.26794/1999-849X‑2021-14-2-72-83.
6. Руус Й., Пайк С., Фернстрем Л. Интеллектуальный капитал: практика управления. СПб. : Высшая школа менеджмента, 2010. 436 с.
7. Bontis N. (2004). National Intellectual Cap‐ ital Index: A United Nations initiative for the Arab region, Journal of Intellectual Capital, no. 1, pp. 13–
39. DOI: 10.1108/14691930410512905.
8. Макаров П.Ю. Интеллектуальный капитал в понятийно-категориальном аппарате экономической науки: критическое осмысление и систематизация // Вопросы экономики. 2022. № 4. С. 5–25. 10.32609/0042-8736-2022-4-5-25.
9. Ханушек Э., Вёссманн Л. Интеллектуальный капитал в разных странах мира. Образование и экономическая теория роста / пер. с англ. Ю. Каптуревского ; под науч. ред. А. Рябова ; Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики». М. : Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики, 2022. 349 с.
10. Как увеличить человеческий капитал и его вклад в экономическое и социальное развитие : Тезисы докладов / С. С. Бирюкова [и др.] ; под ред. Я. И. Кузьминова, Л. Н. Овчаровой, Л. И. Якобсона ; Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики». М. : Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики, 2018. 63 с.
11. Структурно-инвестиционная политика в целях обеспечения экономического роста в Рос‐ сии : Монография / под науч. ред. акад. В. В. Ивантера. М. : Научный консультант, 2017. 196 с.
12. Богатырева Е.Е. Финансовое управление воспроизводством человеческого капитала в инновационной экономике : теория, методология, моделирование. Новополоцк : ПГУ, 2013. 400 с.
13. Moyer R.C., McGuigan J.R., Kretlow W.J. (2009). Contemporary Financial Management. South Western.
14. Соболева И.В. Человеческий потенциал российской экономики: проблема сохранения и развития. М. : Наука, 2007. 203 с.
15. Sen A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Клейнер Г.Б. Системная экономика: шаги развития. М. : Издательский дом «Научная библиотека», 2021. 746 с.
17. Полтерович В.М. О формировании системы национального планирования в Рос‐ сии // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. 2015. № 2 (26). С. 237–242.
18. Campbell Al. (2021). Government Economic Activity, Neoliberalism and Capitalism, Markets and Planning, and Socialism, Problems in Political Economy, no. 4 (28), pp. 38–51. URL: https:// zenodo.org/record/5838337.
19. Cockshott W. Paul, Allin Cottrell (1993). Towards a New Socialism. Nottingham: Spokesman.
20. Бодрунов С.Д., Воейков М.А. Государство, ноономика и постклассическая политэкономия // Вопросы политической экономии. 2021. № 4 (28). С. 22–37. URL: https://zenodo.org/ record/5838322.
REFERENCES
1. Smirnov V.T., Soshnikov I.V., Romanchin V.I., Skoblyakova I.V. (2005). Human capital: content and types, evaluation and stimulation. Mono‐ graph. Moscow: Mechanical Engineering-1, Oryol: OryolSTU. 513 p.
2. Anikin V.A. (2017). Human capital: the for‐ mation of concepts and the main interpretations, Economic sociology, vol. 18, no. 4. September, pp.120–156.DOI:10.17323/1726-3247-2017-4-120-156.
3. Kozyrev A.N. (2006). Intellectual capital economy, Scientific reports, no. 7(R). Saint Peters‐ burg: Research Institute of Management of St. Pe‐ tersburg State University. 30 p.
4. Gruzina Yu.M., Kharchilava H.P. (2021). The development of human capital in high-tech and knowledge-intensive sectors of the economy, Humanities. Bulletin of the Financial University, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 62–66. DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-6-62-66.
5. Loseva O.V., Abdikeev N.M. (2021). The con‐ cept of human intellectual capital in the context of digitalization of the economy, Economics. Taxes. Right, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 72–83. DOI: 10.26794/1999- 849X‑2021-14-2-72-83.
6. Rouse J., Payk S., Fernstrom L. (2010). In‐ tellectual Capital: Practice of Management. Saint Petersburg: Higher School of Management. 436 p.
7. Bontis N. (2004). National Intellectual Capital Index: A United Nations initiative for the Arab region, Journal of Intellectual Capital, no. 1, pp. 13–
39. DOI: 10.1108/14691930410512905.
8. Makarov P.Yu. (2022). Intellectual capital in the conceptual-cathegoric apparatus of economic science: critical understanding and systematization, Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 4, pp. 5–25. 10.32609/0042- 8736-2022-4-5-25.
9. Hanushek E., Viessmann L. (2022). Intel‐ lectual capital in different countries of the world. Education and economic growth theory. Trans. from English by Yu. Kapturevsky. National Re‐ search University “Higher School of Economics”. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics. 349 p.
10. Biryukov S.S. (2018). How to increase hu‐ man capital and its contribution to economic and social development: theses of reports. National Research University “Higher School of Econom‐ ics”. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics. 63 p.
11. Ivanter V.V. (sc. ed.) (2017). Structural and investment policy in order to ensure economic growth in Russia. Monograph. Moscow: Nauchny Konsultant. 196 p.
12. Bogatyreva E.E. (2013). Financial man‐ agement of the reproduction of human capital in an innovative economy: theory, methodology, modeling. Novopolotsk: PSU. 400 p.
13. Moyer R.C., McGuigan J.R., Kretlow W.J. (2009). Contemporary Financial Management. South Western.
14. Soboleva I.V. (2007). The human potential of the Russian economy: the problem of preserva‐ tion and development. Moscow: Nauka. 203 p.
15. Sen A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Kleiner G.B. (2021). System economy: de‐ velopment steps. Moscow: Publishing House “Na‐ uchnaya biblioteka”. 746 p.
17. Polterovich V.M. (2015). On the formation of the national planning system in Russia, Journal of the New Economic Association, no. 2 (26), pp. 237–242.
18. Campbell Al. (2021). Government Economic Activity, Neoliberalism and Capitalism, Markets and Planning, and Socialism, Problems in Political Economy, no. 4 (28), pp. 38–51. URL: https:// zenodo.org/record/5838337.
19. Cockshott W. Paul, Allin Cottrell (1993). Towards a New Socialism. Nottingham: Spokesman.
20. Bodrunov S.D., Voeykov M.A. (2021). The state, noonomics and post-classical political econ‐ omy, Questions of political economy, no. 4 (28),
pp. 22–37. URL: https://zenodo.org/record/5838322.
