Methods of forming and maintaining cohesion in a virtual team
EDN CTOHHH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3385-2025-1-129-146Abstract
Introduction. The active development of digital communication technologies significantly expands the possibilities of organizing joint work of teams from different cities, countries and even continents. The concept of a virtual or distributed team in modern management practice is becoming commonplace today. Simultaneously with the «virtualization» and «hybridization» (a combination of face-to-face and remote work) of collaboration, the problem of managing the cohesion of such collectives and teams is being actualized. The purpose of the article is to analyze the efficiency and effectiveness of existing methods and practices of virtual team building in a digital environment and propose a new method for forming and maintaining virtual team cohesion.
Materials and methods. To achieve this goal, scientific publications devoted to the formation and maintenance of cohesion of virtual teams were analyzed, existing digital methods and practices of cohesion using the ICE framework were compared, the author's synthesis of this material was made and a description of a new integrated method for the formation and maintenance of cohesion of virtual teams was given.
Results. As a result, the signs of a virtual team are formalized and classified, the author's interpretation of the concept of team cohesion is formulated, the prerequisites of team cohesion are generalized and classified, 8 main existing methods of virtual team cohesion in a digital environment are identified and evaluated, negative group effects of team cohesion are systematized and a comprehensive method of forming and maintaining virtual team cohesion is proposed, including the prevention of the mentioned negative group effects. Scientific novelty: a comparison of existing digital methods and cohesion practices using the ICE framework has been carried out, the negative group effects of team cohesion have been generalized and systematized, a comprehensive method for forming and maintaining virtual team cohesion has been developed, including the prevention of negative group effects and including practices such as cooperative video games, team page management and informal video meetings prevention of negative group effects and accounting of the team's work schedule, carried out using a specially designed chatbot.
Discussion. In the theory and practice of formation and maintenance of virtual team cohesion, there is a lack of comprehensive methods, the existing studied practices do not offer prevention of negative group effects, a convenient combination of practices with the team's work schedule is not provided, the effect of using most methods has not yet been sufficiently investigated. The proposed integrated approach seems to be a promising direction for the development of virtual team building methods.
Keywords
Team cohesion, virtual team, team building methods, digital environment.
References
1. Vuchkovski D., Zalaznik M., Mitręga M., Pfajfar G. A look at the future of work: The digital transformation of teams from conventional to virtual // Journal of Business Research. 2023. Volume 163. P. 1–17. DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113912. EDN UUUMSS.
2. Кожевникова Л. В., Старовойтова И. Е. Формирование виртуальных команд: удаленный тимбилдинг и лидерство // Вестник университета. 2022. № 4. С. 64–71. DOI 10.26425/1816-4277-2022-4-64-71. EDN YDILLD.
3. Mullen B., Copper С. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration // Psychological Bulletin. 1994. 115. P. 210–227. DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210. EDN GQXBTV.
4. Severt, J. B., Estrada, A. X. (2015) On the Function and Structure of Group Cohesion. In Team Cohesion. Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice (Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 17), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leedspp, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1534-08562015 0000017002.
5. Красностанова М. В. Шарафутдинова Э. М. Инновационный потенциал проектной команды: структура и оценка // Инновационное развитие экономики. 2017. № 4 (40). EDN ZITGAB.
6. Hoegl M., Gemuenden H. G. Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence // Organization Science. 2001. 12 (4). 2001. P. 435–449. DOI 10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635. EDN DSEZNJ.
7. Макаров Ю. В. Формирование групповой сплоченности средствами социально-психологического тренинга // Известия РГПУ им. А. И. Герцена. 2010. № 128. С. 72–83. EDN MQPWKJ.
8. Lott A. J., Lott B. E. (1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables // Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 64 (4). P. 259–309. DOI 10.1037/h0022386.
9. Pries-Heje, J., Pries-Heje, L. (2012). Designing a Framework for Virtual Management and Team Building. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds) Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice. DESRIST 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7286. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_19.
10. Карякин А. М. Командная работа: основы теории и практики / Иван. гос. энерг. ун-т. Иваново, 2003. 212 c. ISBN 5-89482-238-6. EDN YLXUXL.
11. Lurey J. S., Raisinghani M. S. An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams // Information & Management. 2001. Vol. 38. Is. 8. P. 523–544. DOI 10.1016/S0378-7206 (01)00074-X. EDN DYMNNH.
12. Zuofa T., Ochieng E. G. Investigating Barriers to Project Delivery using Virtual Teams // Procedia Computer Science. 2021. Volume 181. P. 1083–1088. DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.304. EDN RFJQFL.
13. Журавлев А. Л., Занковский А. Н. Личность и виртуальная организация: психологические проблемы и перспективы научных исследований // Изв. Сарат. ун-та Нов. сер. Сер. Акмеология образования. Психология развития. 2017. № 4. С. 318–323. DOI 10.18500/2304-9790-2017-6-4-318-323. EDN ZWZDQX.
14. Шмите Д. Виртуальные команды разработки // Открытые системы. СУБД. 2014. № 10. С. 23–25. EDN TCGYOJ.
15. Purvanova R. K., Bono J. E. Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams, The Leadership Quarterly. Volume 20. Issue 3. 2009. P. 343–357. DOI 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.004.
16. Макарченко М. А., Павлова О. Н. Особенности трансформации классического командообразования в виртуальное в условиях цифровизации // Научно-технические ведомости Санкт-Петербургского государственного политехнического университета. Экономические науки. 2018. № 1. С. 39–53. DOI 10.18721/JE.11104. EDN YSIGOV.
17. Балашова И. В. Внедрение цифровых технологий в организацию работы виртуальных команд // Научный вестник: финансы, банки, инвестиции. 2022. № 4 (61). С. 91–99. EDN POMNQX.
18. Красностанова М. В. Социометрические показатели в оценке стартапов // Мир экономики и управления. 2018. Т. 18, № 2. С. 132–152. DOI 10.25205/2542-0429-2018-18-2-132-152. EDN XQYVSX.
19. Николаева О. О., Иванушкина Е. С., Марков К. К., Сидорова Е. Н. Повышение уровня командной сплоченности группы детей 7–9 лет, занимающихся синхронным плаванием // Современные наукоемкие технологии. 2017. № 2. С. 131–135. EDN YHHZSN.
20. Ласкова Т. С., Айдаркина Е. Е. Современные подходы к командообразованию: сущность, этапы реализации и особенности применения // Естественно-гуманитарные исследования. 2020. № 1 (27). С. 122–127. DOI 10.24411/2309-4788-2020-00022. EDN CPGTCP.
21. Дибоу Т. А. Основные методы сохранения сплоченности коллектива // Лидерство и менеджмент. 2017. № 2. С. 77–84. DOI 10.18334/lim.4.2.38109. EDN ZITIQD.
22. Stawnicza O. Information and Communication Technologies – Creating Oneness in Globally Distributed IT Project Teams // Procedia Technology. 2014. Volume 16. P. 1057–1064. DOI 10.1016/j.protcy. 2014.10.060.
23. Willis J. J. Communications Management in Partially Distributed Teams // IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 2010. Vol. 43. Is. 25. P. 117–122. DOI 10.3182/20101027-3-XK-4018.00024.
24. Спичева Д. И. Тимбилдинг в коллективе цифровых кочевников // Цифровое кочевничество как глобальный и сибирский тренд : сборник материалов III Международной трансдисциплинарной научно-практической WEB-конференции. Томск, 24–26 мая 2016 года. Томск: Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет, 2017. С. 245–252. DOI 10.17223/ 9785946216104/38. EDN ZGQYCV.
25. Kovalčík J., Švecová M., Kabát M. Viability of Using Digital Games for Improving Team Cohesion: A Systematic Review of the Literature // Acta Ludologica. 2023. 6. P. 46–65. DOI 10.34135/ actaludologica.2023-6-1.46-65. EDN AIOLZW.
26. Багаутдинова Ю. В. Зарубежные подходы к внедрению геймификации в бизнес и управление предприятиями // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Экономика. 2022. Т. 24, № 3. С. 199–214. DOI 10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2022.3.16. EDN DIMWVI.
27. Каштанова Е. В., Шушаков В. В., Павлов А. Н., Пикалов Н. М. Цифровые решения организации процесса адаптации, используемые при удаленных формах занятости персонала // УПИРР. 2022. № 6. С. 49–55. DOI 10.12737/2305-7807-2022-11-6-49-55. EDN MGFFEG.
28. Кожевникова Л. В., Старовойтова И. Е. Удалённые команды: вызовы времени. Москва: Русайнс, 2022. 80 с. ISBN 978-5-466-01733-5. EDN NPZGRH.
29. Валишин Е. Н. Особенности быстрой адаптации к виртуальной командной работе во время непредвиденных событий (COVID-19) // Современная наука: актуальные проблемы теории и практики. Серия: Экономика и право. 2022. № 6. С. 22–26. DOI 10.37882/2223-2974.2022.06.05. EDN JRLRYP.
30. Василевская И. И., Тарасик М. А. Виртуальное командообразование как способ повышения эффективности организаций в условиях современного развития цифровых технологий // На пересечении языков и культур. Актуальные вопросы гуманитарного знания. 2024. № 1 (28). С. 329–333. EDN TYVQJE.
31. Дидушко М. М. Развитие инструментов управления в условиях удаленной работы // Социально-гуманитарные знания. 2024. № 9. С. 34–39. EDN UBJZUO.
REFERENCES
1. Vuchkovski, D., Zalaznik, M., Mitręga, M., Pfajfar, G. (2023) A look at the future of work: The digital transformation of teams from conventional to virtual. Journal of Business Research, 163, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113912. https://elibrary.ru/uuumss.
2. Kozhevnikova, L. V., Starovoitova, I. E. (2022) Virtual teams formation: Remote team building and leadership. Vestnik universiteta, no. 4, pp. 64–71. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-4-64-71. https://elibrary.ru/ydilld.
3. Mullen, B., Copper, C. (1994) The relationship between group cohesion and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, pp. 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210. https://elibrary.ru/gqxbtv.
4. Severt, J.B., Estrada, A.X. (2015) On the Function and Structure of Group Cohesion. In Team Cohesion. Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice (Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 17), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leedspp, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1534-08562015 0000017002.
5. Krasnostanova, M. V. Sharafutdinova, E. M. (2017) Innovative potential of the project team: structure and evaluation. Innovative development of economy journal, no. 4 (40). https://elibrary.ru/zitgab.
6. Hoegl, M., Gemuenden, H. G. (2001) Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence. Organization Science, 12 (4), pp. 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635. https://elibrary.ru/dseznj.
7. Makarov, Yu. V. (2010) Development of group unity through social psychological training. Scientific journal of Herzen University, no.128, pp. 72–83. https://elibrary.ru/mqpwkj.
8. Lott, A. J., Lott, B. E. (1965) Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 64 (4), 259–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022386.
9. Pries-Heje, J., Pries-Heje, L. (2012) Designing a Framework for Virtual Management and Team Building. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds) Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice. DESRIST 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7286. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_19.
10. Karyakin, A.M. (2003) Teamwork: fundamentals of theory and practice. Ivanovo, 212 p. ISBN 5-89482-238-6.
11. Lurey, J. S., Raisinghani, M. S. (2001) An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information & Management, 38 (8), pp. 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206 (01)00074-X. https://elibrary.ru/dymnnh.
12. Zuofa, T., Ochieng, E. G. (2021) Investigating Barriers to Project Delivery using Virtual Teams. Procedia Computer Science, 181, pp. 1083–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.304. https://elibrary.ru/rfjqfl.
13. Zhuravlev, A. L., Zankovsky, A. N. (2017) An individual and a virtual organization: psychological problems and prospects of scientific research. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, no. 4, pp. 318–323. https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2017-6-4-318-323. https://elibrary.ru/zwzdqx.
14. Schmite, D. (2014) Virtual development teams. Open Systems. DBMS, no. 10, pp. 23–25. https://elibrary.ru/tcgyoj.
15. Purvanova, R. K., Bono, J. E. (2009) Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 20 (3), pp. 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.004.
16. Makarchenko, M. A., Pavlova, O. N. (2018) Features of transforming classical team building into virtual in the context of digitalization. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University journal. Economics, no. 1, pp. 39–53. https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.11104. https://elibrary.ru/ysigov.
17. Balashova, I. V. (2022) The introduction of digital technologies in the organization of the work of virtual teams. Scientific Bulletin: Finance, Banking, Investment, no. 4 (61), pp. 91–99. https://elibrary.ru/ pomnqx.
18. Krasnostanova, M. V. (2018) Sociometric Indicators in Start-Up's Evaluation. World of Economics and Management, 18 (2), pp. 132–152. https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2018-18-2-132-152. https://elibrary.ru/xqyvsx.
19. Nikolaeva, O. O., Ivanushkina, E. S., Markov, K. K., Sidorova, E. N. (2017) Increasing the level of command cohesion children 7–9 years engaged in synchronized swimming. Modern high technologies, no. 2, pp. 131–135. https://elibrary.ru/yhhzsn.
20. Laskova, T. S., Aidarkina, E. E. (2020) Modern approaches to team building: essence, implementation stages and application features. Natural humanitarian studies, no. 1 (27), pp.122–126. https://doi.org/ 10.24411/2309-4788-2020-00022. https://elibrary.ru/cpgtcp.
21. Dibow, T. A. (2017) Basic methods of preserving team cohesion. Leadership and management, no. 2, pp. 77–84. https://doi.org/10.18334/lim.4.2.38109. https://elibrary.ru/zitiqd.
22. Stawnicza, O. (2014) Information and Communication Technologies – Creating Oneness in Globally Distributed IT Project Teams. Procedia Technology, 16, pp. 1057–1064 https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.protcy.2014.10.060.
23. Willis, J. J. (2010) Communications Management in Partially Distributed Teams. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 43 (25), pp. 117–122. https://doi.org/ 10.3182/20101027-3-XK-4018.00024.
24. Spicheva, D. I., Konovalenko, M. A. (2017) Teambuilding in the digital nomads’ working teams // Digital nomadism as a global and Siberian trend : A collection of materials of the III International transdisciplinary scientific and practical WEB conference. Tomsk, May 24–26, 2016. Tomsk, National Research Tomsk State University, pp. 245–252. https://doi.org/10.17223/9785946216104/38. https://elibrary.ru/zgqycv.
25. Kovalčík, J., Švecová, M., Kabát M. (2023) Viability of Using Digital Games for Improving Team Cohesion: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Acta Ludologica, 6 (1), pp. 46–65. https://doi.org/ 10.34135/actaludologica.2023-6-1.46-65. https://elibrary.ru/aiolzw.
26. Bagautdinova, Yu. V. (2022) oreign Approaches to the Introduction of Gamification in Business
and Enterprise Management. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika [Journal of Volgograd State University. Economics], 24 (3), pp. 199–214. https://doi.org/10.15688/ ek.jvolsu.2022.3.16. https://elibrary.ru/dimwvi.
27. Kashtanova, E. V., Shushakov, V. V., Pavlov, A. N., Pikalov, N. M. (2022) Digital solutions for the organization of the adaptation process used in remote forms of personnel employment. Management of the personnel and intellectual resources in Russia, no. 11 (6), pp. 49–55. https://doi.org/10.12737/2305-7807-2022-11-6-49-55. https://elibrary.ru/mgffeg.
28. Kozhevnikova, L. V., Starovoitova, I. E. (2022) Remote commands: challenges of time. Moscow, Rusains Limited Liability Company, 80 p. ISBN 978-5-466-01733-5. https://elibrary.ru/npzgrh.
29. Valishin, E. N. (2022) Features of abrupt (rapid) adaptation to virtual teamwork during COVID-19. Sovremennaâ nauka: aktualʹnye problemy teorii i praktiki. Ekonomika i pravo, no. 6, pp. 22–26. https://doi.org/10.37882/2223-2974.2022.06.05. https://elibrary.ru/jrlryp.
30. Vasilevskaya, I. I., Tarasik, M. A. (2024) Virtual team building as a way to increase the effectiveness of organizations in the context of modern development of digital technologies. At the intersection of languages and cultures. Current issues of humanitarian knowledge, no. 1 (28), pp. 329–333. https://elibrary.ru/tyvqje.
31. Didushko, M. M. (2024) Development of management tools in the remote working environment. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya, no. 9, pp. 34–39. https://elibrary.ru/ubjzuo.
