CLASSIFICATION OF THE FACTORS OFAN ENTERPRISE INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Evgeniy V. Popov Ural Institute of Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Автор
  • Viktoriya L. Simonova Ural Institute of Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Автор
  • Igor P. Chelak Ural Institute of Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2021-4-151-165

Keywords:

stakeholder, innovation ecosystem, environmental indicators, high-tech enterprise, ecosystem management

Abstract

In the current environment, the active development and implementation of innovations in their broad sense become the basic factor of survival and sustainable growth of socio-economic systems and the national economy as a whole. Following this trend, entrepreneurial, platform, service, technological, digital and other enterprises become innovative ecosystems. At the same time, the analytical apparatus for assessing the parameters of their development is not sufficiently developed. In order to provide a theoretical and practical contribution to the ecosystem approach emerging in the economy and management, the article defines the innovation ecosystem of a high-tech enterprise and suggests its scheme based on the classification of stakeholders. Stakeholders are divided into sectors of consumers, contractors (suppliers and competitors), public administration institutions, social and scientific and educational spheres. The calculated factors (or indicators that characterize them) of each party that mutually influence the business entity as the core of the ecosystem are indicated. Examples and effects of cross-impacts in the ecosystem are given, as well as a number of contradictions that slow down the pace of ecosystem development. The author proposes a hypothesis about the analytical model for assessing the innovation ecosystem of a high-tech enterprise based on the classification of stakeholders. Within the framework of the ecosystem management technologies, it is suggested that the efficiency and stability of interactions between economic entities and other stakeholders of the ecosystem are based on the principle of balancing their interests.

The set of research methods includes the analysis of scientific publications, factor modeling and classification. The practical basis for the study is the innovation ecosystem of a large production enterprise of the Sverdlovsk region, which is part of the Rostec Corporation. The theoretical and practical contributions of the research are the clarification and approbation of the stakeholder scheme of the innovation ecosystem in different business models and ecosystems of social entrepreneurship. Besides the paper discusses the principles of development and sustainability of ecosystem relations and interactions in economic systems.

Author Biographies

  • Evgeniy V. Popov, Ural Institute of Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

    Advanced Doctor in Economic Sciences, Full Professor; Ural Institute of Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (66, 8 Marta St., Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russia); epopov@mail.ru.

  • Viktoriya L. Simonova, Ural Institute of Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

    Ph.D. of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor; Ural Institute of Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (66, 8 Marta St., Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russia); vlsimonova1409@gmail.com.

  • Igor P. Chelak , Ural Institute of Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

    Ural Institute of Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (66, 8 Marta St., Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russia); chelak@mail.ru.

References

1. Раменская Л.А. (2020). Применение концепции экосистем в экономико-управленческих исследованиях // Управленец. № 4. С. 16–28.

2. Радюкова Я.Ю., Архипова Ю.К., Сутягин В.Ю., Колесниченко Е.А. (2019). Развитие экосистем в современной экономике: возможности и последствия // Известия Юго-Западного государственного университета. Серия: Экономика. Социология. Менеджмент. № 9 (6). С. 29–38.

3. Adilson Giovanini, Pablo F. Bittencourt, Mau- rício Uriona Maldonado (2019). Innovation Ecosys- tem in Application Platforms: An Exploratory Study of The Role of Users, Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas (SP). February, 20. Pp. 1–28.

4. Wang Z., Sun Z. (2020). From Globalization to Regionalization: The United States, China, and the Post-Covid-19 World Economic Order, Journal of Chinese Political Science, 10.1007/s11366- 020- 09706-3.

5. Плахин А.Е., Ткаченко И.Н., Евсеева М.В. (2020). Архитектура инновационной экосистемы промышленности региона // Вестник НГИ- ЭИ. № 8 (111). С. 51–59.

6. Bryson Hilton, Bita Hajihashemi, Conor M. Henderson, Robert W. Palmatier. (2020). Customer Success Management: The next evolution in cus- tomer management practice? Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 90, October, Pp. 360–369.

7. Thomson L., Kamalaldin A., Sjödin D., Pari- da V. (2021). A maturity framework for autonomous solutions in manufacturing firms: The interplay of technology, ecosystem, and business model, Inter- national Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 10.1007/s11365-020-00717-3.

8. Madis Talmar, Bob Walrave, Ksenia S. Podoynitsyna, Jan Holmström, A. Georges L. Romme (2020). Mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems: The Ecosystem Pie Model, Long Range Planning, vol. 53, no. 4. 10.1016/j.lrp.2018.09.002.

9. Soldak M.O. (2019). Industrial ecosystems and technological development, Econ. promisl, no. 4 (88), pp. 75–91.

10. Daniel Nepelski, Vincent Van Roy (2020). In- novation and innovator assessment in R&I ecosys- tems: the case of the EU Framework Programme, The Journal of Technology Transfer, June 26. Рp. 1–36.

11. Sang M. Lee, Silvana Trimi. (2021). Con- vergence innovation in the digital age and in the COVID-19 pandemic crisis, Journal of Business Re- search, vol. 123, pp. 14–22.

12. Jonathan Mukiza Peter Kansheba (2020). Small business and entrepreneurship in Africa: the nexus of entrepreneurial ecosystems and produc- tive entrepreneurship, Small Enterprise Research, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 110–124. DOI: 10.1080/13215906.2020.1761869.

13. Попов Е.В., Симонова В.Л., Челак И.П. (2020). Стейкхолдерская модель инновационной экосистемы региона // Инновации. № 6 (260). С. 46–53.

14. Carayannis E., Campbell D. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge. Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other? A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable De- velopment and Social Ecology, International Jour- nal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, vol. 1, pp. 41–69.

15. Admore Tutsirayi Nyamaka, Adele Botha, Judy Van Biljon, Mario Alphonso Marais. (2020). The components of an innovation ecosystem frame- work for Botswana’s mobile applications, The Elec- tronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, vol. 86, no. 6. 10.1002/isd2.12137.

16. Vinit Paridaa, Thommie Burströmc, Ivanka Visnjicd, Joakim Wincenta (2020). Orchestrating in- dustrial ecosystem in circular economy: A two-stage transformation model for large manufacturing com- panies, Journal of Business Research, August, vol. 101, pp. 715–725.

17. Donata Siuskaite, Vaida Pilinkiene, Dainius Zvirdauskas (2019). The Conceptualization of the Sharing Economy as a Business Model, Inzinerine Ekonomika – Engineering Economics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 373–381.

18. Маркова Н.А., Марков Д.А. (2018). Проблемы внедрения концепции бережливого производства на предприятиях // Управленец. Т. 9. № 6. С. 40–48.

19. Орехова С.В., Мисюра А.В., Кислицын Е.В. (2020). Управление возрастающей отдачей высокотехнологичной бизнес-модели в промышленности: классические и экосистемные эффекты // Управленец. Т. 11. № 4. С. 43–58.

20. Anna Lütje, Volker Wohlgemuth (2020). Requirements Engineering for an Industrial Symbio- sis Tool for Industrial Parks Covering System Analysis, Transformation Simulation and Goal Setting, Ad- ministrative Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1. pp. 1–24.

21. Omar Valdez-De-Leon (2018). How to De- velop a Digital Ecosystem: a Practical Framework, Technology Innovation Management Review, no. 12, pp. 43–54.

22. Jarrod Ormiston (2019). Blending practice worlds: Impact assessment as a transdisciplinary practice, Business Ethics: A European Review, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 423–440.

23. Попов Е.В., Симонова В.Л., Тихонова А.Д. (2020). Сетевой потенциал фирмы в условиях цифровизации экономической деятельности // Журнал экономической теории. Т. 17. № 1. С. 117–129.

24. Tarald O. Kvålseth (2018). Relationship be- tween concentration ratio and Herfindahl-Hirsch- man index: A re-examination based on majorization theory, Heliyon, vol. 4, no. 10. https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(18)30297-4.

25. Anthony R.N., Govindarajan V. (2000). Man- agement Control Systems (10th international edition). New York, McGraw-Hill Irwin. 784 p.

26. Попов Е.В., Челак И.П. (2020). Факторы влияния на развитие инновационных экосистем // Сборник материалов VII Летней школы по институциональной и эволюционной экономике. Ханты-Мансийск : Югорский государственный университет. С. 52–66.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-08-24

Data Availability Statement

Research article

Issue

No. 4 (2021): Management Issues

Section

Organization management

How to Cite

Popov, E. V., Simonova, V. L., & Chelak , I. P. (2021). CLASSIFICATION OF THE FACTORS OFAN ENTERPRISE INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT. Management Issues, 71(4), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2021-4-151-165

Most read articles by the same author(s)