Methodology for assessing the effectiveness of strategic management of public catering enterprises under uncertainty

EDN UGZWBD

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/30cjve64

Abstract

Introduction. Continuously evolving economic phenomena and processes, along with an increase in the interdependence of hard-to-account-for and hard-to-predict factors, shape and increase uncertainty in the functioning of enterprises, necessitating a modification of existing management tools. Objective: development of an original methodology for assessing the efficacy of strategic management in enterprises under conditions of uncertainty.

Materials and methods. Synthesis of system analysis tools, environmental (the paradigm of self-developing environments) and resource (the “subject - poly-subject environment” paradigm) approaches corresponding to the paradigms of the post-nonclassical stage in the development of scientific knowledge, critical analysis of theories and concepts within the basic Schools of strategic management, and methods for assessing the efficiency of enterprises, resource-process approach.

Results. A system of environmental factors by level of uncertainty, taking into account their influence in the formation of enterprise development strategies, is Identified, proposed an algorithm for the author’s methodology for assessing the effectiveness of strategic enterprise management under conditions of uncertainty within the framework of a result-process approach, including four interrelated blocks subordinate to a single goal – determining the conditions for progressive enterprise development in the long term by taking into account the influence of uncertainty factors. The possibility of its use, taking into account industry specifics, in relation to public catering enterprises is shown.

Discussion. The sequence of algorithmized actions will make it possible to take into account to a greater

extent the interdependencies of various factors of different levels of uncertainty in the external and internal

environments of an enterprise in a specific branch of the economy, which can become the basis for developing an adaptive model of strategic management. The results obtained are of interest from the standpoint of further of uncertainty. The practical value of the proposed tools is determined by the possibilities of identifying the advantages and limitations of enterprise development in the long term under conditions of uncertainty.

KEYWORDS: levels of uncertainty, external and internal environment, resource approach, performance process approach, environmental approach, business processes of the enterprise

Author Biographies

  • Elena V. Bazueva , Perm State National Research University

    Advanced Doctor in Economic Sciences, Full Professor; Perm State National Research University — professor of the Department of World and Regional Economics and Economic Theory (15, Bukirev St., Perm, 614990, Russia); Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences — leading researcher (56a, Gorky St., Vologda, 160014, Russia); bazueva.l@mail.ru. SPIN: 8886-7780, ORCID: 0000-0002-0945-3597, ResearcherID: E-1233-2017

  • Aleksandr A. Starozhuk , Perm State National Research University

    Perm State National Research University — postgraduate student of the Department of World and Regional Economics and Economic Theory (15, Bukirev St., Perm, 614990, Russia); starskymaf@yandex.ru. ORCID: 0009-0006-3732-1993

References

1. КОРОЛЕВ М. И. Неопределенность бизнес- среды и безопасность фирмы // Вестник Волго- градского государственного университета. Серия 3: Экономика. Экология. 2011. No 1 (18). С. 20–24. EDN NWGAPN.

2. КЛЕЙНЕР Г. Б. Информационная теория факторов управления экономическими организациями // Российский журнал менеджмента. 2022. Т. 20, No 4. С. 461–481. DOI 10.21638/spbu18.202 2.401. EDN VZALEA.

3. БУРЫКИН А. Д., ЮРЧЕНКО А. В. Виды и факторы неопределенности бизнес-среды // Современные тенденции развития науки и технологий. 2017. No 1-5. С. 21–25. EDN XVCBEN.

4. НИКИТИНС И. Инновационный взгляд на современные способы оценки степени неопре- деленности деловой среды и инструменты ее снижения // Вопросы инновационной экономи- ки. 2022. Т. 12, No 1. С. 223–236. DOI 10.18334/ vinec.12.1.114193. EDN CWSFHI.

5. ГЛАДКОВ Н. И. Стратегическое управление вусловияхнеопределенностиивысокойтурбу- лентности // Экономика и бизнес: теория и прак- тика. 2018. No 6. С. 47–49. EDN XTJNSX.

6. BENNETT, N., & LEMOINE, J. (2014). What a Dif- ference a Word Makes: Understanding Threats to Per- formance in a VUCA World. SSRN Electronic Journal, Article 2406676. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2406676.

7. VON GLASERSFELD, E. (2001). The Radical Con- structivist View of Science. Foundations of Science, (6), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011345023932.

8. MILLAR, C. C. J. M., GROTH, O., & MAHON, J. F. (2018). Management Innovation in a VUCA World: Challenges and Recommendations. California Man- agement Review, 61(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.11 77/0008125618805111.

9. ГРАЧЕВ А. А. Основные требования VUCA- среды к компетентности работника // Институт психологии Российской академии наук. Организационная психология и психология труда. 2020. Т. 5, No 3. С. 120–136. DOI 10.38098/ipran. opwp.2020.16.3.006. EDN TDQSIH.

10. ТРОФИМОВА Н. Н., БУДАГОВ А. С. Ключевые направления адаптивного управления предприятиями в условиях экономической нестабильности и цифровизации современного VUCA- мира // Экономика и управление: проблемы, решения. 2021. Т. 1, No 11 (119). С. 112–117. DOI 10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2021.11.01.015. EDN EJWSWS.

11. ФОМЕНКО А. В., НОВИКОВА-КАЛИТА Е. Л., БУРМИСТРОВА Е. В. Трансформация бизнеса в эпоху «VUCA-мира» и критерии успеха управ- ления изменениями // Инновационная деятельность. 2021. No 3 (58). С. 61–67. EDN MCDRKE.

12. СОРОКА С. А. Оценка эффективности управления организацией сферы услуг // Наука и биз- нес: пути развития. 2021. No 5 (119). С. 169–171. EDN ODBTVH.

13. СЛЕПУХИНА А. А., ЯКОВЛЕВА Е. А., ГАДЖИ- ЕВ М. М. Обзор моделей управления экономической эффективностью предприятия // Вопросы структуризации экономики. 2013. No 3. С. 10–15. EDN TKKSDJ.

14. ШЕВЧЕНКО С. Ю., ИВАНОВ А. А. Системы оценочных показателей стратегического и оперативного контроллинга // Известия Уральского государственного экономического университета. 2014. No 3 (53). С. 25–32. EDN SFWBFX.

15. TIMOFEEV, R., KIYMOV, I., YACHMENEVA, V., & YACHMENEV, E. (2020). Retrospective of key as- pects of the concept of sustainable development. In 20th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geo- ConferenceSGEM2020(pp.425–430).STEF92Tech- nology. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2020/5.2/s21.052.

16. VERETEKHIN, A. V., & YACHMENEVA, V. M. (2020). Industrial enterprise development manage- ment under digitalization. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(5), 1209– 1215. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.E5768.018520.

17. ВИХАНСКИЙ О. С., КАТАЛЕВСКИЙ Д. Ю. Кон- курентное преимущество в эпоху цифровиза- ции // Российский журнал менеджмента. 2022. Т. 20, No 1. С. 5–27. DOI 10.21638/spbu18.2022.101. EDN JBXPYI.

18. ЕВСЕЕВА М. В. Сравнительная эффективность высокотехнологичных и среднетехнологичных бизнес-моделей: ключевые индикаторы и устойчивость ценности // Управленец. 2020. Т. 11, No 3. С. 59–71. DOI 10.29141/2218-5003- 2020-11-3-5. EDN GNQKAW.

19. РАСТОВА Ю. И., РАСТОВ М. А. Стратегическое управление современной организацией: эффект синергии концепций // Управленческие науки. 2018. Т. 8, No 3. С. 20–31. DOI 10.26794/2404-022X- 2018-8-3-20-31. EDN VAJLHG.

20. СУЛТАЕВА Н. Л. Особенности функциони- рования и проектирования предприятий бы- строго обслуживания // Сервис в России и за ру- бежом. 2011. No 1 (20). С. 183–192. EDN NDXEOH.

21. ЕРЕМИЯ Т. В. Особенности пищевой промышленности и их влияние на систему обслужи- вания потребителей // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Экономика. 2009. No 3. С. 77–83. EDN LAIJLF.

22. КУЗЬМИНА А. О., ЖЕРНОКЛЕЕВА А. С. Современное состояние и тенденции развития пище- вой промышленности России // Молодой ученый. 2019. No 17 (255). С. 149–152. EDN ICUUUZ.

23. ПАХОМОВА О. А. Специфика пищевой промышленности как отрасли экономического производства // Вестник Чувашского университета. 2007. No 3. С. 468–472. EDN JWVZNJ.

24. ЛАДЫГИНА Е. Е. Концептуальная модель формирования и оценки уровня клиентоориен тированности предприятий // Вестник МГСУ. 2017. Т. 12, No 3 (102). С. 284–292. DOI 10.22227/ 1997-0935.2017.3.284-292. EDN YLFZAJ.

25. ЗАХАРОВА И. И., КРЫЛОВА Р. В. История развития заведений фаст-фуда в России // Инновационная наука. 2016. No 3-1. С. 97–101. EDN VQBCTP.

26. ОСИПОВ В. А., КРАСОВА Е. В., ВИЧКОВСКИЙ Н. А. Современные подходы к стратегическому управлению на предприятии в условиях неопределенности // Лидерство и менеджмент. 2022. Т. 9, No 4. С. 1015–1032. DOI 10.18334/ lim.9.4.116639. EDN ZDIYLG.

27. ИЗМАЙЛОВИЧ С. В. Управление организацией в условиях неопределенности и риска //

Вестник Полоцкого государственного университета. Серия A. Гуманитарные науки. 2003. Т. 2, No 1. С. 14–22. EDN ZMMOWT.

28. КАЧАЛОВ Р. М., СЛЕПЦОВА Ю. А. Бизнес-эко- системы в кризисных условиях: выявление фак- торов риска // Российский журнал менеджмента. 2022. Т. 20, No 2. С. 155–171. DOI 10.21638/ spbu18.2022.201. EDN GXYRNK.

29. СОСНЕНКО Л. С., МАТВЕЕВ Б. А. Содержание понятий «риск» и «рискованность» // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. 2008. No 29. С. 32–38. EDN MURWIZ.

REFERENCES

1. KOROLEV, M. I. (2011). Uncertainty of the busi- ness environment and safety of the firm. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Global Eco- nomic System, (1), 20–24. https://elibrary.ru/nwgapn.

2. KLEINER, G. B. (2022). Information theory of economic organizations management factors. Rus- sian Management Journal, 20(4), 461–481. https:// doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2022.401.

3. BURYKIN, A. D., & YURCHENKO, A. V. (2017). Types and factors of uncertainty in the business environment. Modern Trends in the Development of Science and Technology, (1-5), 21–25. https:// elibrary.ru/xvcben.

4. NIKITINS, I. (2022). Innovative approaches to measure the business environment uncertainty and tools to combat it. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 12(1), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.183 34/vinec.12.1.114193.

5. GLADKOV, N. I. (2018). Strategic management in conditions of uncertainty and high turbulence. Economy and Business: Theory and Practice, (6), 47–49. https://elibrary.ru/xtjnsx.

6. BENNETT, N., & LEMOINE, J. (2014). What a Difference a Word Makes: Understanding Threats to Performance in a VUCA World. SSRN Electronic Journal, Article 2406676. https://doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.2406676.

7. VON GLASERSFELD, E. (2001). The Radical Con- structivist View of Science. Foundations of Science, (6), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011345023932.

8. MILLAR, C. C. J. M., GROTH, O., & MAHON, J. F. (2018). Management Innovation in a VUCA World: Challenges and Recommendations. California Man-

agement Review, 61(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.11 77/0008125618805111.

9. GRACHEV, A. A. (2020). Basic requirements of the VUCA-environment for employee competence. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Organizational Psychology and Labor Psy- chology, 5(3), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.38098/ ipran.opwp.2020.16.3.006.

10. TROFIMOVA, N. N., & BUDAGOV, A. S. (2021). Key directions of adaptive enterprise management in the conditions of economic instability and digi- talization of the modern VUCA-world. Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions, 1(11), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2021.11.01.015.

11. FOMENKO, A. V., NOVIKOVA-KALITA, E. L., & BURMISTROVA, E. V. (2021). Business transforma- tion in the era of “VUCA-world” and the criteria for the success of change management. Innovation Ac- tivities, (3), 61–67. https://elibrary.ru/mcdrke.

12. DAVIES, H., & ELLIS, P. (2000). Porter’s com- petitive advantage of nations: Time for the final judge- ment. Journal of Management Studies, 37(8), 1189– 1214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00221.

13. SOROKA, S. A. (2021). Assessment of the man- agement efficiency of the service organization. Sci- ence and Business: Ways of Development, (5), 169– 171. https://elibrary.ru/odbtvh.

14. SLEPUKHINA, A. A., YAKOVLEVA, E. A., & GAD- ZHIEV, M. M. (2013). Review of enterprise economic efficiency management models. Issues of Economic Structuring, (3), 10–15. https://elibrary.ru/tkksdj.

15. SHEVCHENKO, S. YU., & IVANOV, A. A. (2014). The scorecards of strategic and operational controlling. Journal of the Ural State University of Economics, (3), 25–32. https://elibrary.ru/sfwbfx.

16. TIMOFEEV, R., KIYMOV, I., YACHMENEVA, V., & YACHMENEV, E. (2020). Retrospective of key as- pects of the concept of sustainable development. In 20th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geo- Conference SGEM 2020 (pp. 425–430). STEF92 Technology. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2020/5.2/ s21.052.

17. VERETEKHIN, A. V., & YACHMENEVA, V. M. (2020). Industrial enterprise development manage- ment under digitalization. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(5), 1209– 1215. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.E5768.018520.

18. VIKHANSKY, O. S., & KATALEVSKY, D. YU. (2022). The competitive advantage in the age of digitaliza- tion. Russian Management Journal, 20(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2022.101.

19. EVSEEVA, M. V. (2020). Comparative effective- ness of high-tech and medium-tech business mod- els: Key indicators and value sustainability. The Manager, 11(3), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.29141/2 218-5003-2020-11-3-5.

20. RASTOVA, YU. I., & RASTOV, M. A. (2018). Stra- tegic management of a modern organization: Con- cept synergy effect. Management Sciences, 8(3), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2018- 8-3-20-31.

21. SULTAEVA, N. L. (2011). Features of the func- tioning and design of fast food enterprises. Services in Russia and Abroad, (1), 183–192. https://elibrary. ru/ndxeoh.

22. EREMIA, T. V. (2009). Features of the food- processing industry and their influence on system of service of consumers. Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Economics, (3), 77–83. https:// elibrary.ru/laijlf.

23. KUZMINA, A. O., & ZHERNOKLEEVA, A. S. (2019). Current state and development trends of the Russian food industry. Young Scientist, (17), 149–152. https:// elibrary.ru/icuuuz.

24. PAKHOMOVA, O. A. (2007). Specifics of the food industry as a branch of economic production. Vest- nik Chuvashskogo Universiteta, (3), 468–472. https:// elibrary.ru/jwvznj.

25. LADYGINA, E. E. (2017). Concept model of cre- ation and evaluation of the degree of focus-on-cli- ents of the enterprise. Vestnik MGSU, 12(3), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2017.3.284-292.

26. ZAKHAROVA, I. I., & KRYLOVA, R. V. (2016). History of the development of fast food establish- ments in Russia. Innovation Science, (3-1), 97–101. https://elibrary.ru/vqbctp.

27. OSIPOV, V. A., KRASOVA, E. V., & VICHKOV- SKY, N. A. (2022). Current approaches to strategic man- agement in a company amidst uncertainty. Leader- ship and Management, 9(4), 1015–1032. https://doi. org/10.18334/lim.9.4.116639.

28. IZMAILOVICH, S. V. (2003). Managing an orga- nization under conditions of uncertainty and risk. Herald of Polotsk State University. Series A . Humanity Science, 2(1), 14–22. https://elibrary.ru/zmmowt.

29. KACHALOV, R. M., & SLEPTSOVA, YU. A. (2022). Business ecosystems under crisis conditions: Identi- fying risk factors. Russian Management Journal, 20(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2022.201.

30. SOSNENKO, L. S., & MATVEEV, B. A. (2008). Contents of the concepts “risk” and “riskiness”. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, (29), 32–38. https://elibrary.ru/murwiz.

Published

2024-02-24

Issue

Section

Organization management

How to Cite

Bazueva , E. V., & Starozhuk , A. A. (2024). Methodology for assessing the effectiveness of strategic management of public catering enterprises under uncertainty: EDN UGZWBD. Management Issues, 18(1), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.22394/30cjve64