PATRIOTISM AS A POLITICAL IDEOLOGYIN THE STRUCTURE OF MODERN POLITICAL CONSCIOUSNESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2021-2-6-15Keywords:
political consciousness, political ideology, patriotism, national identity, political elite and nationhoodAbstract
The relevance of research lies in the fact that regardless of the ban on the use of political ideology,
as it is stated in the constitution, in the CIS countries the ruling elites today use several methods for transformation of political consciousness of the people by ideologizing sociopolitical norms and traditions, albeit informally but as state ideology.
The purpose of the article is to determine the general development of patriotism as state ideology in the
CIS countries and to identify the methods used to describe the content of patriotism by the ruling elites, as well as to develop patriotism as an ideology in the structure of political consciousness.
The following methods were used in this research: methods of comparison and analogy and historical approach.
The scientific novelty consists in revealing the essence of patriotism in the Post-Soviet countries and
the trends in its development, such as negative and positive patriotism. The research pays attention to the
importance of patriotism in shaping the corresponding political consciousness.
Results. The state ideology is prohibited in the post-Soviet countries. However, due to the absence of
another method of government control, today assimilation of patriotism and the state ideology is frequently used to ensure stability through the transformation of political consciousness. The article reveals the formation of the norms and values of patriotism on the basis of the customs and traditions of the state and its history. Patriotism is used by the ruling elite as a state ideology, as a method of political education
and formation of the necessary political consciousness in order to create loyal social groups, especially among the younger generation.
References
1. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. (1982). Манифест коммунистической партии. М. : Политиздат. 63 с.
2. Маркс K., Энгельс Ф. (1988). Немецкая идеология. Т. XVI. М. : Политиздат. 574 с.
3. Мангейм К. Идеология и утопия. URL: https://ru.bookmate.com/books/FrNvr8oo (дата обращения: 30.10.2020).
4. Яковлев М.В. (2015). Актуальные теоретические модели демократии в СНГ // Каспийский регион: политика, экономика, культура.№ 3 (44). С. 141–148.
5. Дзахова Л.Х., Бязрова Д.Б. (2017). Идеология как необходимый фактор жизни современного общества // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Ученые записки СКАГС. № 1. С. 150–153.
6. Соловьев А.И. (2018). Дискурсы и праксисы: может ли идеология помочь в управлении государством? // «Полития». № 1 (88). С. 7–29.
7. Гришин Н.В. (2019). Государство как субъект политики формирования идентичности // Каспийский регион: политика, экономика, культура. № 3 (60). С. 66–72.
8. Геллнер Э. (1991). Нация и национализм :пер. с англ. / Ред. и послесл. И. И. Крупника. М. : Прогресс. 320 с.
9. Щербинин А.И. (2016). Патриотизм как номенклатурный конструкт // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. № 3 (35). С. 264–271.
10. Философский словарь / Под ред. И. Т. Фролова. 4-е изд. М. : Политиздат, 1980. 444 с.
11. Морозов И.Л. (2018). Патриотизм и межкультурный диалог как парадигма будущего для России и всего мира // PolitBook. № 1. С. 34–47.
12. Трифонов Ю.Н. (2017). Смыслы и парадоксы патриотического дискурса в современной России : политико-философский ракурс // Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Серия «Социология. Политология». Т. 17. Вып. 1. С. 86–91.
13. Трифонов Ю.Н. (2016). О патриотической идеологии в условиях идеологического многообразия // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. № 3 (35). С. 245–254.
14. Сковиков А.К. (2017). Взаимодействие гражданского общества с органами государственной власти в формировании патриотизма // PolitBook. № 3. С. 34–44.
15. Мелешкина Е.Ю. (2019). Запрещение коммунистической символики в посткоммунистических странах // Вестник финансового университета. № 4. С. 36–45.
16. Политология / Под ред. В. Н. Лавриненко. М. : 2015. 522 с.
17. Макаревич Э.Ф. (2016). Идеология как единство ценностей // PolitBook. № 3. С. 134–150.
18. Шестов Н.И. (2017). Мифологическое и
фактическое в технологии патриотического воспитания // Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Серия «Социология. Политология». Т. 17. Вып. 2. С. 185–190.
19. Резаков М.Р. (2017). К вопросу о политических механизмах формирования патриотизма //Каспийский регион: политика, экономика, культура. № 3 (52). С. 151–156.
20. Буренко В.И. (2017). Политическая социализация в трансформирующихся обществах (к вопросу о патриотизме) // PolitBook. № 4. С. 126–137.
21. Кара-Мурза С.Г. (2005). Манипуляция сознанием. М. : Изд-во «Эксмо». 832 с.
1. Marx K., Engels F. (1982). Manifesto of the Communist Party. Moscow, Politizdat, 63 p.
2. Marx K., Engels F. (1988). German ideology. Vol. XVI. Moscow, Politizdat, 574 p.
3. Mannheim K. Ideology and utopia. URL: https://ru.bookmate.com/books/frnvr8oo (accessed 30.10.2020).
4. Yakovlev M.V. (2015). Actual theoretical models of democracy in the CIS, Caspian region: politics, economics, culture, no. 3 (44), pp. 141–148.
5. Dzakhova L.H., Byazrova D.B. (2017). Ideology as a necessary factor in the life of modern society, State and municipal management. Scientific Notes of SKAGS, no. 1, pp. 150–153.
6. Solovyov A.I. (2018). Discourse and Praxis: Can ideology help in managing the state? “Politia”, no. 1 (88), pp. 7–29.
7. Grishin N.V. (2019). State as a subject of identity formation policy, Caspian region: politics, economics, culture, no. 3 (60), pp. 66–72.
8. Gellner E. (1991). Nation and nationalism. Moscow, Progress, 320 p.
9. Shcherbinin A.I. (2016). Patriotism as a nomenclature construct, Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, no. 3 (35), pp. 264–271.
10. Frolova I.T. (ed.) (1980). Philosophical dictionary. Politizdat, 444 p.
11. Morozov I.L. (2018). Patriotism and intercultural dialogue as a paradigm of the future for Russia and the whole world, Politbook, no. 1, pp. 34–47.
12. Trifonov Yu.N. (2017). The meanings and paradoxes of patriotic discourse in modern Russia: political and philosophical perspective, Izvestia of the Saratov University. New series. Series “Sociology. Political science”, vol. 17, vol. 1, pp. 86–91.
13. Trifonov Yu.N. (2016). On patriotic ideology in ideological variety, Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, no. 3 (35), pp. 245–254.
14. Skovikov A.K. (2017). The interaction of civil society with state authorities in the formation of patriotism, PolitBook, no. 3, pp. 34–44.
15. Meleshkina E.Yu. (2019). Prohibition of communist symbolism in post-communist countries, Bulletin of the Financial University, no. 4, pp. 36–45.
16. Lavrinenko V.N. (ed.) (2015). Political science. 522 p.
17. Makarevich E.F. (2016). Ideology as unity of values, PolitBook, no. 3, pp. 134-150.
18. Shestov N.I. (2017). Mythological and actual in the technology of patriotic education, News of the Saratov University. New series. Series “Sociology. Political science”, vol. 17, no.2, pp. 185–190.
19. Rezakov M.R. (2017). On the question of political mechanisms for the formation of patriotism, Caspian region: politics, economics, culture, no. 3 (52), pp. 151–156.
20. Burenko V.I. (2017). Political socialization in transforming societies (to the question of patriotism), PolitBook, no. 4, pp. 126-137.
21. Kara-Murza S.G. (2005). Manipulation consciousness. Moscow, Publishing House “Eksmo”, 832 p.
