FRAMEWORK OF STANDARDS OF BLOCKCHAIN USE IN SOCIAL AND LABOR RELATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2021-1-48-61Keywords:
blockchain, smart contracts, distributed ledger, social and labor relations, framework of standards, security requirements, consensus.Abstract
Problem statement. Blockchain and smart contracts are technologies that in the nearest future may affect the quality and nature of relations in almost any sphere, including labor relations. At the present stage of development, these technologies are in the phase of formation, therefore, standardization procedures are especially important for all spheres, including social and labor relations.
The scientific task. The goal of this paper is to work out principles for the framework of standards development in blockchain and smart contracts to be used in the sphere of social and labor relations. Based on this, the following tasks are singled out: definition of labor relations specific features and their reflection in the blockchain; incorporation of labor contracts requirements into the system of smart contracts; determination of mechanisms of blockchain platform data application during social and labor relations management.
Methodological base of this research is the approaches to standardization of activities and relations in ISO.
The information base is the standards worked out by the Russian and international technology committees, as well as regulations in the sphere of blockchain uses and scientific publications in this field of knowledge.
Main results. The paper presents a model of the structure of the environment for establishment and conduct of social and labor relations on a blockchain platform. The role of blockchain and smart contracts in this sphere is explained. Moreover, the article provides recommendations on the areas for further standardization of the use of technology in social and labor relations.
Conclusions. The proposed recommendations may be used by developers and researchers who are working on the integration of blockchain in new areas of public life. Guarantees of social and labor relations, satisfaction of the participants, and the results of work depend on how well the blockchain platform is organized and its smart contracts are specified. This work requires highly qualified professionals, clear algorithms and standards for the preparation and integration of blockchain and smart contracts.
References
1. Брыкин К.И. (2018). Блокчейн как средство реализации принципа прозрачности (открытости) в сфере публичных финансов // Финансовое право. № 4. С. 39–42.
2. Грачев А.И., Алексеева Т.В. (2018). Целесообразность использования технологии блокчейна в сфере образования // Прикладная информатика. Т. 13. № 6 (78). С. 50–59.
3. Гумеров Э.А., Алексеева Т.В. (2020). Особенности технического задания на разработку блокчейн-систем управления // Прикладная информатика. Т. 15. № 2 (86). С. 37–47.
4. Гумеров Э.А., Алексеева Т.В. (2020). Безопасное применение смарт-контрактов в блок-чейн-системах управления // Прикладная информатика. Т. 15. № 3 (87). С. 119–134.
5. Гумеров Э.А., Алексеева Т.В. (2020). Разработка информационной системы программ-оракулов в блокчейн системах управления // Прикладная информатика. Т. 15. № 5 (89). С. 124–136.
6. Дли М.И., Салов Н.А. (2018). Управление жизненным циклом экономической информационной системы с применением теории децентрализованных приложений // Прикладная информатика. Т. 13. № 1 (73). С. 5–12.
7. Долженко Р.А. (2019). Современные платформы блокчейн: преимущества и перспективы использования // Менеджмент в России и за рубежом. № 3. С. 59–70.
8. Долженко Р.А. (2020). Трансакционные издержки при использовании блокчейна и умных контрактов в трудовых отношениях // Журнал экономической теории. Т. 17. № 1. С. 130–143. DOI: 10.31063/2073-6517/2020.17-1.10.
9. Дурнев В.Г., Мурин Д.М., Соколов В.А., Чалый Д.Ю. (2018). О некоторых подходах к решению задачи «Useful Proof-of-work for block- chains» // Моделирование и анализ информационных систем. Т. 25. № 4. С. 402–410. DOI: 10.182 55/1818-1015-2018-4-402-410.
10. Иващенко Н.П., Шаститко А.Е., Шпакова А.А. (2019). Смартконтракты в свете новой институциональной экономической теории // Journal of Institutional Studies. Т. 11. № 3. С. 64–083. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.3.064-083.
11. Исламутдинов В.Ф. (2020). Институциональные изменения в контексте цифровой экономики // Journal of Institutional Studies. Т. 12.
№ 3. С. 142–156. DOI: 10.17835/2076- 6297.2020.12.3.142-156.
12. Лескина Э.И. (2018). Применение блок-чейн-технологий в сфере труда // Юрист. № 11. С. 25–30.
13. Новиков С.П., Михеенко О.В., Кулагина Н.А., Казаков О.Д. (2018). Цифровизация учета профессиональных компетенций граждан на основе технологий распределенных реестров и смарт-контрактов // Бизнес-информатика. № 4(46). С. 43–53. DOI: 10.17323/1998-0663.2018.4.
43.53.
14. Попов Е.В., Веретенникова А.Ю. (2020). Долевая экономика : Монография. М. : Издательство «Юрайт». 405 с.
15. Попов Е.В. (2018). Теория эконотроники. Екатеринбург : Институт экономики УрО РАН. 62 с.
16. Савельев А.И. (2017). Некоторые правовые аспекты использования смарт-контрактов и блокчейн-технологий по российскому праву // Закон. № 5. С. 94–117.
17. Савельев И.Е. (2018). Применение технологии распределенного реестра в сфере высшего профессионального образования // Прикладная информатика. Т. 13. № 2 (74). С. 49–55.
18. Финогеев А.Г., Васин С.М., Гамидуллаева Л.А., Финогеев А.А. (2018). Технология смарт-контрактов на основе блокчейн для минимизации трансакционных издержек в региональных инновационных системах // Вопросы безопасности. № 3. С. 34–55. DOI: 10.25136/2409- 7543.2
018.3.26619. URL: https://nbpublish.com/librar y_read_article.php?id=26619 (дата обращения: 04.03.2020).
19. Фролов Д.П. (2019). Постинституциональная теория блокчейна // Журнал экономической теории. Т. 16. № 2. С. 262–278.
20. Фролов Д.П. (2020). От трансакционных издержек – к трансакционной ценности: преодолевая фрикционную парадигму // Вопросы экономики. № 8. С. 51–81.
21. Шахназаров Б.А. (2019). Комплексная взаимосвязь блокчейн-технологии и объектов интеллектуальной собственности в трансграничных частноправовых отношениях // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. № 5. С. 121–147. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2019.5.121.147.
22. Davidson S., De Filippi P., Potts J. (2018). Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism, Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 639—658. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137417000200.
23. De Filippi P., Hassan S. (2016). Blockchain Technology as a Regulatory Technology: From Code is Law to Law is Code, First Monday, vol. 21, no. 12.
24. Tapscott D., Tapscott A. (2017). How blockchain will change organizations, MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 10–13.
25. Wattenhofer R. (2016). The science of the blockchain. Create Space Independent Publishing Platform.
REFERENCES
1. Brykin K.I. (2018). Blockchain as a means of implementing the principle of transparency (openness) in the field of public finance, Financial Law, no. 4, pp. 39–42.
2. Grachev A.I., Alekseeva T.V. (2018). Feasibility of using blockchain technology in education, Applied Informatics, vol. 13, no. 6 (78), pp. 50–59.
3. Gumerov E.A., Alekseeva T.V. (2020). Features of the technical assignment for the development of blockchain control systems, Applied Informatics, vol. 15, no. 2 (86), pp. 37–47.
4. Gumerov E.A., Alekseeva T.V. (2020). Safe use of smart contracts in blockchain control systems, Applied Informatics, vol. 15, no. 3 (87), pp. 119–134.
5. Gumerov E.A., Alekseeva T.V. (2020). Development of an information system for oracle programs in blockchain control systems, Applied Informatics, vol. 15, no. 5 (89), pp. 124–136.
6. Dli M.I., Salov N.A. (2018). Management of the life cycle of an economic information system using the theory of decentralized applications, Applied Informatics, vol. 13, no. 1 (73), pp. 5–12.
7. Dolzhenko R.A. (2019). Modern blockchain platforms: advantages and prospects of use, Management in Russia and abroad, no. 3, pp. 59–70.
8. Dolzhenko R.A. (2020). Transaction costs when using blockchain and smart contracts in labor relations, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 130–143. DOI: 10.31063/2073-6517/2020.17- 1.10.
9. Durnev V.G., Murin D.M., Sokolov V.A., Chaly D.Yu. (2018). On some approaches to solving the problem “Useful Proof-of-work for blockchains”, Modeling and analysis of information systems, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 402–410. DOI: 10.18255/1818-1015-2018-4-402-410.
10. Ivaschenko N.P., Shastitko A.E., Shpakova A.A. (2019). Smart contracts in the light of the new institutional economic theory, Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 64–083. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.3.064-083.
11. Islamutdinov V.F. (2020). Institutional changes in the context of the digital economy, Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 142–156. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2020.12.3.142-156.
12. Leskina E.I. (2018). The use of blockchain technologies in the world of work, Lawyer, no. 11, pp. 25–30.
13. Novikov S.P., Mikheenko O.V., Kulagina N.A., Kazakov O.D. (2018). Digitalization of accounting for professional competencies of citizens based on technologies of distributed registers and smart contracts, Business Informatics, no. 4 (46), pp. 43–53. DOI: 10.17323/1998-0663.2018.4.43.53.
14. Popov E.V., Veretennikova A.Yu. (2020). Shared Economy. Moscow: Publishing house “Yurayt”. 405 p.
15. Popov E.V. (2018). The theory of econotronics. Ekaterinburg: Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 62 p.
16. Savelyev A.I. (2017). Some legal aspects of the use of smart contracts and blockchain technologies under Russian law, Law, no. 5, pp. 94–117.
17. Saveliev I.E. (2018). Application of distributed register technology in the field of higher professional education, Applied Informatics, vol. 13, no. 2 (74),
pp. 49–55.
18. Finogeev A.G., Vasin S.M., Gamidullaeva L.A., Finogeev A.A. (2018). Blockchain-based smart contracts technology to minimize transaction costs in regional innovation systems, Security Issues, no. 3, pp. 34–55. DOI: 10 . 25136 / 2409 -
7543.2018.3.26619. URL: https://nbpublish.co m/library_read_article.php?id=26619 (accessed 04.03.2020).
19. Frolov D.P. (2019). Postinstitutional blockchain theory, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 262–278.
20. Frolov D.P. (2020). From transaction costs to transaction value: overcoming the frictional paradigm, Problems of Economics, no. 8, pp. 51–81.
21. Shakhnazarov B.A. (2019). Complex relation- ship between blockchain technology and intellectual property in cross-border private law relations, Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, no. 5, pp. 121–147. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2019.5.121.147.
22. Davidson S., De Filippi P., Potts J. (2018). Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism, Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 639—658. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137417000200.
23. De Filippi P., Hassan S. (2016). Blockchain Technology as a Regulatory Technology: From Code is Law to Law is Code, First Monday, vol. 21, no. 12.
24. Tapscott D., Tapscott A. (2017). How blockchain will change organizations, MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 10–13.
25. Wattenhofer R. (2016). The science of the blockchain. Create Space Independent Publishing Platform.
