Rethinking the role of private partner in university campus management
EDN DBVLTO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3385-2025-1-115-128Abstract
Introduction. In the context of constrained budgetary resources and increasing demand for high-quality educational environments, significant attention is being directed toward mechanisms of public-private partnerships (PPPs). This instrument not only facilitates the attraction of additional investments into the educational sector but also transforms traditional management models. The purpose of the article is to explore the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders within projects aimed at establishing and operating modern campuses based on PPP principles, as well as to identify a novel model of private partner participation in PPP initiatives. The author examines the role of the private partner in the implementation of a federal project focusing on creating a network of modern campuses, drawing comparisons between Russia’s experience and that of other countries in the field of PPPs. The article also investigates a management model wherein the private partner develops a product-service framework to deliver a wide range of services within the campus environment.
Materials and methods. The research is based on the legal and regulatory analysis traditional methods application, as well as case studies of university infrastructure management in Russia and abroad. An analysis of the use of PPP was carried out on the example of 17 university campuses participating in the federal project «Establishment of a Network of Modern Campuses.» This analysis enabled the identification of typological characteristics of campuses based on location, thematic focus of academic and research activities, and the role of the private partner.
The results of the research. The study revealed key features of the distribution of functions, risks, and areas of responsibility among stakeholders involved in the creation of modern campuses. A new model of private partner participation was developed, which includes the expansion of their functions in the development and provision of products and services within the campus. This model involves the formation of a consortium of professional operators during the structuring of relationships within the PPP mechanism.
Discussion. The author proposes a novel approach in which the private partner acts as the initiator of a product-service model and the formation of an operator consortium, offering a wide range of services. This approach not only enhances the operational efficiency of the campus but also meets the needs of all user groups. Future research prospects lie in the development of new formats of interaction between public and private entities in the management process, as well as in defining performance indicators to evaluate the effectiveness of their collaborative efforts in implementing product and service models.
KEYWORDS
Public-private partnership, concession, campus, private partner, service model.
References
1. Волков Л. В. Государственно-частное партнерство как необходимый институт современной экономики // Инновации и инвестиции. 2017. № 5. С. 225–228. EDN DSKDVQ.
2. Алиуллов И. Ф. Потенциал государственно-частного партнерства в развитии экономики субъектов РФ // Актуальные вопросы экономики и современного менеджмента: сб. науч. трудов по итогам III международной научно-практической конференции. 2016. С. 68–70. EDN VYRKJD.
3. Руденко Т. Ю. Сравнительный анализ государственно-частного партнерства и концессии как договорных форм реализации инвестиционных соглашений с участием публично-правовых образований // Известия Тульского государственного университета. Экономические и юридические науки. 2018. № 2 (2). С. 95–101. EDN XZOKHB.
4. Andrews M., Entwistle T. (2015). Public-private partnerships for infrastructure development: Financial, institutional and political dimensions. Policy & Politics. 43 (2). DOI 10.1332/ 030557314X13917703359707.
5. Roy R., Marsafawy H. (2023). University Campus Life and Activities Aligned with Students' Preferences towards Designing Competency Model Framework. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 22, 188–206. DOI 10.26803/ijlter.22.2.11 EDN ZSFKJJ.
6. Минина И. С. Международный и российский опыт применения форм государственно-частного партнерства в сфере высшего образования // Уровень жизни населения регионов России. 2017. № 4 (206). C. 95–101. DOI 10.12737/article5a3c 3d8d0f95a7.15201521. EDN YTIJOR.
7. Сайфуллин Р. И. Зарубежный опыт государственно-частных партнерств и их роль в развитии образования // Актуальные проблемы экономики и права. 2012. № 1. С. 62–68. EDN OPUXDJ.
8. Gerard E. (2024). Private Higher Education and Inequalities in the Global South. Lessons from Africa, Latin America and Asia. Springer. DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-54756-0.
9. Трунова О. Д., Силин М. В. Особенности реализации государственно-частного партнерства в сфере образования в России и за рубежом // Ars Administrandi (Искусство управления). 2015. № 4. С. 82–96. EDN VLIBDF.
10. Богданова Р. М., Козлов В. М. Развитие государственно-частного партнерства в России // Актуальные проблемы гуманитарных и общественных наук: сборник материалов научно-практической конференции. 2022. С. 18–21. EDN DSSVIK.
11. Громова Е. А. Проблемы Федерального закона «О государственно-частном, муниципально-частном партнерстве» // Юрист. 2017. № 10. С. 16. EDN YRCBRN.
12. Боталова М. Е. Международная и российская практика партнерских отношений в социально-инфраструктурной сфере // Вестник евразийской науки. 2018. Т. 10. № 2. С. 9. EDN XSDECL.
13. Лолохоева И. А. Роль частного сектора в развитии образования: тенденции и вызовы // Управление образованием: теория и практика. 2023. № 13 (3). С. 226–234. DOI 10.25726/f8359-1512-5637-q. EDN SHLOIG.
14. Den Heijer A, Magdaniel F. (2018). Campus-City Relations: Past, Present, and Future. Geographies of the University. 439–459. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75593-9_13.
15. Curvelo Magdaniel, F.C., De Jonge, H., Den Heijer, A. (2018). Campus development as catalyst for innovation. Journal of Corporate Real Estate. 20 (2), 28–42. DOI 10.1108/JCRE-07-2016-0025.
16. Макейкина С. М., Чинаева Ю.Н. Государственно-частное партнерство в социальной сфере на региональном уровне: проблемы и перспективы развития // Контентус. 2021. № 8. С. 57–68. DOI: 10.24411/2658-6932-2021-8-57-68. EDN NJTUJE.
17. Пригаро C.В. Подходы и методы управления университетскими кампусами // Инженерно-строительный вестник Прикаспия. 2022. № 1 (39). С. 133–139. DOI 10.52684/2312-3702-2022-39-1-133-139. EDN ESUECL.
18. Liu, J., E. D. Love, P., Smith, J., Regan, M. and Sutrisna, M. (2014) Public-Private Partnerships: a review of theory and practice of performance measurement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63 (4), 499–512. DOI 10.1108/IJPPM-09-2013-0154.
19. Голышев Г. А. Развитие инфраструктуры с использованием концессионных и долгосрочных инвестиционных контрактов // Научно-исследовательский финансовый институт. Финансовый журнал. 2014. № 1. С. 101–110. EDN SCMTZX.
20. Леонова Г. И. Проблемы и перспективы развития государственно-частного партнерства // Индустриальная экономика. 2022. № 3. С. 284–289. DOI 10.47576/2712-7559_2022_3_4_284. EDN OJHBJQ.
21. Леонова Г. И. Теория и практика государственно-частного партнерства // Институционализация экономики: проблемы и решения. 2020. № 2 (21). С. 12–17. DOI 10.36807/2411-7269-2020-2-21-12-17. EDN FQWPLE.
22. Ремизова Т. С., Алаев А. А. Университетские кампусы мирового уровня как новая форма организации образовательных пространств на территории Российской Федерации // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2023. № 27 (2). С. 101–115. DOI 10.15826/umpa.2023.02.016. EDN UJTFED.
23. Шор И. М., Батова В. Н. Государственно-частное партнерство в обеспечении устойчивого развития регионов России: современное состояние, проблемы и перспективы // Региональная экономика. Юг России. 2022. Т.10, № 1. С. 118–125. DOI 10.15688/re.volsu.2022.1.11. EDN AVKFIQ.
REFERENCES
1. Volkov, L. V. (2017) Public-private partnership as a necessary institution of the modern economy. Innovation & Investment, 5, pp. 225–228. https://elibrary.ru/dskdvq.
2. Aliullov, I. F. (2016) Potential of public-private partnership in the development of the economy of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Actual issues of economics and modern management. Collection of scientific papers on the results of the III international scientific and practical conference, pp. 68–70. https://elibrary.ru/vyrkjd.
3. Rudenko, T. Y. (2018) Comparative analysis of the state-private partnership and concession as the contracting forms of realization of investment agreements with participation of public-legal education. Izvestiya Tula State University, 2 (2), pp. 95–101. https://elibrary.ru/xzokhb.
4. Andrews R., Entwistle, T. (2015) Public-private partnerships, management capacity and public service efficiency. Policy & Politics, 43 (2). https://doi.org/ 10.1332/030557314X13917703359707.
5. Roy R., Marsafawy, H. (2023) University Campus Life and Activities Aligned with Students' Preferences towards Designing Competency Model Framework. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22, pp. 188–206. https://doi.org/ 10.26803/ijlter.22.2.11. https://elibrary.ru/zsfkjj.
6. Minina, I. S. (2017) International and russian experience in applying forms or public-private partnership in higher education. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 4 (206), pp. 95–101. https://doi.org/10.12737/article5a3c3d8d0f95a7. 15201521. https://elibrary.ru/ytijor.
7. Saifullin, R. I. (2012) Foreign experience of public-private partnerships and their role in education development. Russian Journal of Economics and Law, 1, pp. 62–68. https://elibrary.ru/opuxdj.
8. Gerard E. (2024) Private Higher Education and Inequalities in the Global South. Lessons from Africa, Latin America and Asia. Publ. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54756-0.
9. Trunova, O. D., Silin, M. V. (2015) Implementation features of public-private partnerships in education in Russian and international practice. Ars Administrandi, 4, pp. 82–96. https://elibrary.ru/vlibdf.
10. Bogdanova, R. M., Kozlov, V. M. (2022) Development of public-private partnership in Russia. Actual problems of humanitarian and social sciences. Collection of materials of scientific and practical conference, pp. 18–21. https://elibrary.ru/dssvik.
11. Gromova, E. A. (2017) Certain problems of the federal law «On public private partnership, municipal private partnership in the Russian Federation and on amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation». Jurist, 10, p. 16. https://elibrary.ru/yrcbrn.
12. Botalova, M. E. (2018) The review of international and Russian partnerships experience in the social and infrastructure sphere. The Eurasian Scientific Journal, 10 (2), p. 9. https://elibrary.ru/xsdecl.
13. Lolokhoeva, I. A. (2023) The role of the private sector in the development of education: trends and challenges. Education Management Review, 13 (3), pp. 226–234. https://doi.org/10.25726/f8359-1512-5637-q. https://elibrary.ru/shloig.
14. Den Heijer A, Magdaniel F. (2018) Campus-City Relations: Past, Present, and Future. Geographies of the University, pp. 439–459. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-75593-9_13.
15. Curvelo Magdaniel, F. C., De Jonge, H., Den Heijer, A. (2018). Campus development as catalyst for innovation. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 20 (2), pp. 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-07-2016-0025.
16. Makeikina, S. M., Chinaeva, Y. N. (2021) Prospects for the use of public-private partnership in the financing of the social sphere at the regional level. Kontentus, 8, pp. 57–68. https://doi.org/10.24411/ 2658-6932-2021-8-57-68. https://elibrary.ru/njtuje.
17. Prigaro, S. V. (2022) Approaches and methods of management of university campuses. Engineering and Construction Bulletin of the Caspian Region, 1 (39), pp. 133–139. DOI: 10.52684/2312-3702-2022-39-1-133-139. https://elibrary.ru/esuecl.
18. Liu, J., E. D. Love, P., Smith, J., Regan, M. and Sutrisna, M. (2014) Public-Private Partnerships: a review of theory and practice of performance measurement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63 (4), pp. 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2013-0154.
19. Golyshev, G. A. (2014) Infrastructure development through concession and long-term investment contracts. Financial Journal, 1, pp. 101–110. https://elibrary.ru/scmtzx.
20. Leonova, G. I. (2022) Problems and prospects for the development of public-private partnership. Industrial economics, 3, pp. 284–289. https://doi.org/ 10.47576/2712-7559_2022_3_4_284. https://elibrary.ru/ojhbjq.
21. Leonova, G. I. (2020) Theory and practice of public-private partnership. Economic Vector, 2 (21), pp. 12–17. https://doi.org/10.36807/2411-7269-2020-2-21-12-17. https://elibrary.ru/fqwple.
22. Remizova, T. S., Alaev, A. A. (2023) World-class university campuses as a new form of organization of educational spaces on the territory of the Russian Federation. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 27 (2), pp. 101–115. https://doi.org/10.15826/ umpa.2023.02.016. https://elibrary.ru/ujtfed.
23. Shor, I. M., Batova, V. N. (2022) Public and Private Partnership in Ensuring Sustainable Development of Russian Regions: Current State, Problems and Prospects. Regionalnaya ekonomika. Yug Rossii [Regional Economy. South of Russia], 10 (1), pp. 118–125. https://doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2022.1.11. https://elibrary.ru/avkfiq.
