CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AND YOUTH PARTICIPATION IN SOCIO-POLITICAL PROCESSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2021-6-67-80Keywords:
youth, civic participation, civic engagement, socio-political processes, municipalitiesAbstract
Research problem. The study of the socio-political activity of young people, the socio-political attitudes of young people is becoming increasingly important. This article is devoted to the problems of socio-political and civic participation of youth at the municipal level.
The purpose of the study is to analyze modern forms of youth participation in socio-political processes at the municipal level, to determine the factors that promote and hinder the active participation of young people in socio-political processes, to identify the main trends in the civic engagement of Russian youth at the municipal level.
Methodology and methods. The methodological basis of this study is the activity approach. During the study, a complex of quantitative and qualitative methods was used: analysis of statistical data, analysis of official documents, a survey and an expert interview. In October–December 2020, a survey of Russian youth aged 14–30 was conducted (n = 2026 people). In January 2021, an expert interview was conducted with 30 experts in the field of youth policy and youth civic participation.
Research results. The experience and the need for the participation of modern Russian youth in socio- political processes at the municipal level, various forms of political and social activity of youth at the municipal level, civic initiatives of youth are revealed. An expert assessment of the state and problems of civic participation of young people in local self-government, the involvement of young people in socio-political processes at the municipal level was obtained. According to most experts, in the near future, new forms of civic activity, such as performances, flash mobs, street events, and online activity, will become popular. There are trends in the digitalization of youth civic engagement.
Scientific novelty. The author’s definition and classification of the forms of civic engagement of young people is proposed. The facts characterizing the experience and the need for civic participation of youth in local self-government are stated. New empirical data on various forms of participation have been obtained, popular forms of youth participation in socio-political processes have been identified. The factors influencing the positive, constructive socio-political activity of modern youth have been established.
Practical significance. The results are important for the development of social and political knowledge in terms of assessing the state and problems of civic participation of young people in local government, aswell as for determining modern trends in civic engagement of young people. The research results can serve as a basis for improving work with youth in municipalities.
References
1. Cheema G.S. (2010). Building trust in government: An introduction. In: Cheema G.S., Popovski V. (eds.) Building trust in government: Innovations in governance reform in Asia. New York: United Nations University Press, pp. 1–21.
2. Barrett M., Pachi D. (2019). Youth Civic and Political Engagement. London: Routledge, 180 p.
3. Bennet W.L., Freelon D., Wells C. (2010). Changing Citizen Identity and the Rise of a Participatory Media Culture. In: Sherrod L.R., Torney- Purta J., Flanagan C.A. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 393–423.
4. Burgess J., Foth M., Klaebe H. (2006). Everyday Creativity as Civic Engagement: A Cultural Citizen-ship View of New Media. In: Papandrea F. (ed.) Proceedings 2006 Communications Policy & Research Forum. Sydney: Network Insight Institute, pp. 1–16.
5. Couldry N., Jenkins H. (2014). Participations: Dialogues on the Participatory Promise of Contemporary Culture and Politics, International Journal of Communication, no. 8, pp. 1107–1112.
6. Couldry N., Mejias U.A. (2018). Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Con- temporary Subject, Television & New Media, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 336–349.
7. Norris P. (ed.) (1999). Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Ox- ford University Press. 320 p.
8. Norris P., Walgrave S., Van Aelst P. (2005). Who Demonstrates? Antistate Rebels, Conventional Participants, or Everyone? Comparative Politics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 189–205.
9. Houston D.J., Harding L.H. (2014). Public trust in government administrators explaining citizen per- ceptions of trustworthiness and competence, Public Integrity, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 53–76.
10. Middaugh E., Clark L.S., Ballard P.J. (2017). Digital Media, Participatory Politics, and Positive Youth Development, Pediatrics, no. 140, supp. 2, pp. 127–131.
11. Metzger A., Ferris K.A., Oosterhoff B. (2019). Adolescents’ Civic Engagement: Concordant and Longitudinal Associations among Civic Beliefs and Civic Involvement, Journal of Research on Adolescence, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 879–896.
12. Соколов А.В. (2021). Развитие гражданской активности в России в условиях цифровой трансформации // Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия: История. Политология. Социология. № 2. С. 68–74.
13. Зотов В.В., Боев Е.И., Василенко Л.А. (2021). Гражданская активность населения в социально-сетевом пространстве региона // Известия Юго-Западного государственного университета. Серия: Экономика. Социология. Менеджмент. Т. 11. № 2. С. 203–216.
14. Какабадзе Ш.Ш., Зайцев Д.Г., Звягина Н.А., Карастелев В.Е. (2011). Институт гражданского участия: проверка деятельностью субъектов // Полис. Политические исследования. № 3. С. 88–108.
15. Никовская Л.И., Скалабан И.А. (2017). Гражданское участие: особенности дискурса и тенденции реального развития // Полис. Политические исследования. № 6. С. 43–60.
16. Cammaerts B. (2008). Critiques on the Partic- ipatory Potentials of Web 2.0, Communication, Culture and Critique, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 358–377.
17. Cohen C., Kahne J. (2012). Participatory Pol- itics: New Media and Youth Political Action, Youth and Participatory Politics Research Network.
18. Kahne J., Lee N.-J., Feezell J.T. (2013). The Civic and Political Significance of Online Participatory Cultures among Youth Transitioning to Adult- hood, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–20.
19. Third A., Conrad D., Moody L., McDonald K. (2020). Digital Media and Adolescent Engagement for Social and Behavioural Change: A Rapid Evidence Review (UNICEF/Western Sydney University). URL: https://www.unicef.org/media/72436/file/Digital-civic-engagement-by-young-people- 2020_4.pdf.
20. Anderson M., Jiang J. (2018). Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018. Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology. URL: https://www.pewinterne t.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology- 2018.
21. Perrin A., Anderson M. (2019). Share of U.S. adults using social media, including Facebook, is mostly unchanged since 2018. Pew Research Cen- ter. URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact- tank/2019/04/10/share-of-u-sadults-using-social- media-including-facebook-is-mostly-unchanged- since-2018.
22. Purohit K. (2019). WhatsApp to Bridgefy, What Hong Kong Taught India’s Leaderless Protesters. URL: https://www.scmp.com/weekasia/politics/article/3042633/whatsapp-bridgefy- what-hong-kong-taught-indias-leaderless.
23. Silver L., Smith A., Johnson C., Jiang J., Anderson M., Rainie L. (2019). Mobile Connectivity in Emerging Economies. Pew Research Center: Inter- net & Technology. URL: https://www.pewinternet. org/2019/03/07/mobile-connectivity-in-emerging- economies.
24. Zhong R. (2019). TikTok Blocks Teen Who Posted About China’s Detention Camps, New York Times. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/ 26/technology/tiktok-muslims-censorship.html.
25. South J. (2018). Civic Engagement Goes Viral When Young Voices Turn to Social Media. URL: https://medium.com/office- of- citizen/civic- engagement-goes-viral-when-young-voices-turn- tosocial-media-ea57ed0c5d65.
26. Sengupta S. (2019). Protesting Climate Change, Young People Take to Streets in a Global Strike, New York Times. URL: https://www.nyti mes.com/2019/09/20/climate/global- climate- strike.html.
27. Johnson M. (2019). Teenage Climate Activists Are Getting Harassed Online. The Hill. URL: https:
//thehill.com/homenews/news/463075-teenage-cl imate-activists-are-getting-harassed-online-report.
28. Ito M., Martin C., Pfister R.C., Rafalow M.H., Tekinbaş K.S., Wortman A. (2019). Affinity Online: How Connection and Shared Interest Fuel Learning. New York: University Press. 256 p.
29. Chen W. (2014). Taking Stock, Moving For- ward: The internet, social networks and civic engage- ment in Chinese societies, Information, Communica- tion and Society, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–6.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Data Availability Statement
Research article
