STRUCTURAL, ECONOMIC AND EDUCATIONAL FACTORS OF SCIENTIFIC EFFICIENCY OF RUSSIAN UNIVERSITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2021-3-107-120Keywords:
strategic development of universities, competitiveness of universities, management of science, scientometrics, internationalization of universitiesAbstract
The government programs aimed at the development of universities, especially those that support research activities exist in many countries. In 2021 the Russian “Project 5-100” has been replaced by the “PRIORITY 2030” program (Strategic Academic Leadership Program). It emphasizes the importance of analyzing the factors that influence various scientific indicators of the Russian universities.
8RSCI AuthorID: 429313, ScopusID: 56581474400
9RSCI AuthorID: 948938, ScopusID: 57208191401
This study examines the indicators of the quantity (number of publications) and quality (number of citations) of research activity of Russian universities in three main databases (WoS, Scopus, RSCI) and the influence of different factors on them: educational, economic, structural, and those related to internationalization. The research is based on the data of performance monitoring of higher educational establishments that provides results of 49 largest Russian universities over the last four years. The main research method is econometric analysis using panel data models.
The results of the study showed that the indicators of internationalization (the number of foreign employees and the number of foreign graduate students) and the number of grants have the greatest influence on the indicators of universities in international databases. The number of citations is also influenced by the number of defended PhD dissertations for the reporting year and there is some evidence that the share of extra-budgetary income of the university is also important. The number of publications is influenced by the quality of student enrollment, the ratio of staff salaries to the regional average, and the share of full-time employees.
In the case of the university indicators in the RSCI database (mainly consisting of Russian publications), the factors differ from the abovementioned: in the model for the number of publications, the quality of enrollment of students and the number of foreign graduate students ceases to be significant, while the indicators of the share of extra-budgetary income and the share of employees with a scientific degree become significant. The share of full-time employees is also significant, where it shows direct correlation.
This study can help university management work out strategies to improve various scientific indicators.
References
1. Åkerlind G.S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature, Studies in higher education, no. 33 (1), pp. 17–31.
2. Vernon M.M., Balas E.A., Momani S. (2018). Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review, PloS one, no. 13 (3), e0193762.
3. Стукалова И.Б., Стукалова А.А. (2016). Финансовые показатели в национальных и глобальных университетских рейтингах // Вестник Российского экономического университета им. Г. В. Плеханова. № 5. С. 15–25.
4. Matveeva N., Sterligov I., Yudkevich M. (2021). The effect of Russian University Excellence Initiative on publications and collaboration patterns, Journal of Informetrics, no. 15 (1), pp. 101–110.
5. Ключарев Г.А., Неверов А.В. (2018). Проект «5-100»: некоторые промежуточные итоги // Вестник Российского университета дружбы на- родов. Серия: Социология. № 18 (1). С. 100–116.
6. Сандлер Д.Г., Евсюкова И.А., Боганцева С.С., Мельник Д.А., Стерхов А.В., Бондарчук Д.В. (2019). Применение комплексных систем показателей при реализации программ повышения конкурентоспособности в контексте развития сотрудничества с индустрией и повышения экономической устойчивости университетов // Экономика в промышленности. № 12 (3). С. 341–355.
7. Michalska-Smith M.J., Allesina S. (2017). And, not or: quality, quantity in scientific publishing, PloS one, no. 12 (6).
8. Hayati Z., Ebrahimy S. (2009). Correlation be- tween quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006, Scientometrics, no. 80 (3), pp. 625–636.
9. Lawani S.M. (1986). Some bibliometric corre- lates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, no. 9 (1-2), pp. 13–25.
10. Wood F. (1990). Factors influencing research performance of university academic staff, Higher Ed- ucation, no. 19 (1), pp. 81–100.
11. Beaudry C., Larivière V. (2016). Which gen- der gap? Factors affecting researchers’ scientific im- pact in science and medicine, Research Policy, no. 45 (9), pp.–1790–1817.
12. Frenken K., Heimeriks G. J., Hoekman J. (2017). What drives university research perfor- mance? An analysis using the CWTS Leiden Ranking data, Journal of informetrics, no. 11 (3), pp. 859–872.
13. Holmberg K., Bowman T., Didegah F., Leh- timäki J. (2019). The Relationship Between Insti- tutional Factors, Citation and Altmetric Counts of Publications from Finnish Universities, Journal of Altmetrics, no. 2 (1).
14. Amara N., Landry R., Halilem N. (2015). What can university administrators do to increase the publication and citation scores of their faculty members? Scientometrics, no. 103 (2), pp. 489–530.
15. Andersen L. B., Pallesen T. (2008). “Not just for the money?” How financial incentives affect the number of publications at Danish research institutions, International Public Management Journal, no. 11 (1), pp. 28–47.
16. Jabnoun N. (2009). Economic and cultural factors affecting university excellence, Quality Assur- ance in Education, no. 17 (4), pp. 416–429.
17. Сандлер Д.Г., Гладырев Д.А. (2020). Построение экономически эффективной системы целевых показателей развития исследовательской деятельности университета с учетом корреляционных зависимостей // Статистика и экономика. № 17 (4). С. 71–84.
18. Рощина Я.М., Юдкевич М.М. (2009). Факторы исследовательской деятельности преподавателей вузов: политика администрации, контрактная неполнота или влияние среды? // Вопросы образования. № 3. С. 203–228.
19. Антосик Л.В., Шевченко Е.С. (2018). Оценка влияния эффективного контракта на публикационную активность преподавателей: кейс регионального университета // Вопросы образования. № 3. С. 247–267.
20. Рощина Я.М., Филиппова Т.Н. (2006). Преподаватели на рынке образовательных услуг. Информационный бюллетень Мониторинга экономики образования. Москва : ГУ ВШЭ. 32 с.
21. Рудаков В.Н., Рощина Я.М., Битокова Л.А. (2019). Изменения стратегий, мотиваций и экономического поведения студентов и преподавателей российских вузов. Информационный бюллетень. Москва : Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики». 84 с.
22. Козьмина Я.Я. (2014). Предпочтения преподавателей вузов относительно научной деятельности и преподавания // Вопросы образования. № 3. С. 135–151.
23. Литвинова Л.И. (2018). Факторы научной продуктивности и проблемы её оценки // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. № 22 (1). С. 61–75.
24. Дежина И.Г. (2020). Научная политика в ведущих российских университетах: эффекты «нового менеджериализма» // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. № 24 (3). С. 13–26. Ислакаева Г.Р. (2019). Институты стимулирования повышения качества научно-исследовательской деятельности в России // Вестник УГН- ТУ. Наука, образование, экономика. Серия: Экономика. № 3 (29). С. 106–113.
REFERENCES
1. Åkerlind G.S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature, Studies in higher education, no. 33 (1), pp. 17–31.
2. Vernon M.M., Balas E.A., Momani S. (2018). Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review, PloS one, no. 13 (3), e0193762.
3. Stukalova I.B., Stukalova A.A. (2016). Financial figures in national and global university ratings, Bulletin of the Plekhanov Russian Economic University, no. 5, pp. 15–25.
4. Matveeva N., Sterligov I., Yudkevich M. (2021). The effect of Russian University Excellence Initiative on publications and collaboration patterns, Journal of Informetrics, no. 15 (1), pp. 101–110.
5. Klyucharev G.A., Neverov A.V. (2018). Project “5-100”: some intermediate results, Bulletin of the Russian University of Friendship of Peoples. Series: Sociology, no. 18 (1), pp. 100–116.
6. Sandler D.G., Evsyukova I.A., Bogantseva S.S., Melnik D.A., Sterkhov A.V., Bondarchuk D.V. (2019). The use of integrated systems of indicators when implementing competitiveness programs in the context of the development of cooperation with industry and increasing the economic sustainability of universities, Economics in industry, no. 12 (3), pp. 341–355.
7. Michalska-Smith M.J., Allesina S. (2017). And, not or: quality, quantity in scientific publishing, PloS one, no. 12 (6).
8. Hayati Z., Ebrahimy S. (2009). Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006, Scientometrics, no. 80 (3), pp. 625–636.
9. Lawani S.M. (1986). Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, no. 9 (1-2), pp. 13–25.
10. Wood F. (1990). Factors influencing research performance of university academic staff, Higher Education, no. 19 (1), pp. 81–100.
11. Beaudry C., Larivière V. (2016). Which gender gap? Factors affecting researchers’ scientific im- pact in science and medicine, Research Policy, no. 45 (9), pp.–1790–1817.
12. Frenken K., Heimeriks G. J., Hoekman J. (2017). What drives university research performance? An analysis using the CWTS Leiden Ranking data, Journal of informetrics, no. 11 (3), pp. 859–872.
13. Holmberg K., Bowman T., Didegah F., Lehtimäki J. (2019). The Relationship Between Institutional Factors, Citation and Altmetric Counts of Publications from Finnish Universities, Journal of Altmetrics, no. 2 (1).
14. Amara N., Landry R., Halilem N. (2015). What can university administrators do to increase the publication and citation scores of their faculty members? Scientometrics, no. 103 (2), pp. 489–530.
15. Andersen L. B., Pallesen T. (2008). “Not just for the money?” How financial incentives affect the number of publications at Danish research insti- tutions, International Public Management Journal, no. 11 (1), pp. 28–47.
16. Jabnoun N. (2009). Economic and cultural factors affecting university excellence, Quality Assurance in Education, no. 17 (4), pp. 416–429.
17. Sandler D.G., Gladyrev D.A. (2020). Building an economically effective system of targets for the development of university research activities, taking into account correlation dependencies, Statistics and economics, no. 17 (4), pp. 71–84.
18. Roschina Ya.M., Yudkevich M.M. (2009). Factors of research activities of university teachers: ad- ministration policy, contractual incompleteness or environmental influence? Education issues, no. 3, pp. 203–228.
19. Antosik L.V., Shevchenko E.S. (2018). Assessment of the impact of an effective contract for the publication activity of teachers: the case of a regional university, Education issues, no. 3, pp. 247–267.
20. Roschina Ya.M., Filippova T.N. (2006). Teachers in the educational services market, Information bulletin of the Education Economy Monitoring. Moscow: GU HSE. 32 p.
21. Rudakov V.N., Roshchina Ya.M., Bitokova L.A. (2019). Changes in strategies, motivation and economic behavior of students and teachers of Russian universities. Newsletter. Moscow, Higher School of Economics. 84 p.
22. Kozmina Ya.Ya. (2014). Preferences of university teachers regarding scientific activities and teach- ing, Education issues, no. 3, pp. 135–151.
23. Litvinova L.I. (2018). Factors of scientific pro- ductivity and problems of its assessment, University management: Practice and analysis, no. 22 (1), pp. 61–75.
24. Dezhina I.G. (2020). Scientific policy in leading Russian universities: the effects of “new managerialism”, University Governance: Practice and Analysis, no. 24 (3), pp. 13–26.
25. Islakaeva G.R. (2019). Institutes of stimulating improvement of the quality of research activities in Russia, Bulletin UGNTU. Science, education, economy. Series: Economy, no. 3 (29), pp. 106–113.
