DIAGNOSTICS OF THE MATURITYOF THE ORGANIZATION’S INFORMATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE MECHANISM IN THE CONTEXT OF ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2022-1-47-60Keywords:
self-development, ecosystem, business ecosystem, information and infrastructure mechanism, self-development management, maturity levels, maturity criteria, company competitivenessAbstract
In the current economic and political situation, which is reflected in all spheres of life, the peculiarities of the BANI era, the high level of digitalization, Big Data and the trends of ecosystem business coalitions, the most urgent issue is the preservation of the sustainable position of enterprises affected by the indicated trends.
The information and infrastructure mechanisms accompanying the acts of self-development of the enterprise are able to respond to these challenges of the time and cope with a large amount of information, helping them to pass certain stages in relation to the initiation and management of self development processes.
The research highlights the maturity levels of the proposed original information and infrastructure mechanism (IIM) for self-development management, which help the enterprise to pass the stages of self- determination: self-configuration, self-initiation and self-transformation. However, we face a number of difficulties, namely: understanding the essence of the maturity of IIM, competent differentiation of these levels and their criteria, their competent layout, taking into account the peculiarities of the functioning of enterprises at the present stage.
These problems can be solved by an ecosystem approach, in which we occupy a higher level of reflection in relation to the mechanism and the enterprise itself. In order to understand the role of the ecosystem approach, the authors set the following tasks: to analyze the theoretical foundations of the ecosystem approach, which will set the vector of characteristics of maturity levels; to identify key characteristics and distribute them by maturity levels; to conduct an empirical study; to highlight the advantages of this approach and its further development prospects.
Based on the selected criteria and levels, an empirical research tool was formed and a survey of employees of one of the enterprises was conducted. The obtained research results allowed the company to diagnose the level of maturity in relation to the self-developing structure, to analyze the state of the system according to all criteria of the level, and to form a vision for strategic steps in the future to enter ecosystem interaction and to make competent management decisions.
3RSCI AuthorID: 256049, ORCID: 0000-0002-4272-1055, ScopusID: 55960368300
4RSCI AuthorID: 616788, ORCID: 0000-0003-4157-5719
Further studies of the practice of applying maturity assessment and management methods in the context of ecosystem management will allow enterprises to see their transition by levels, analyzing the characteristics of the system from the origin of self-organization manifestations to the self-developing structure, which inherently reflects the ecosystem understanding. Thus, enterprises can quickly and accurately make management decisions in accordance with the requirements of modern economic development and ecosystem trends.
References
1. Лалу Ф. (2016). Открывая организации будущего. М. : Манн, Иванов и Фербер. 432 с.
2. Шумпетер Й. (1982). Теория экономического развития: исследование предпринимательской прибыли, капитала, кредита, процента и цикла конъюнктуры. М. : Прогресс. 455 с.
3. Молодчик А.В. (2001). Теория и практика формирования саморазвивающейся организации. Екатеринбург : Ин-т экономики УрО РАН. 246 с.
4. Комаров С.В., Молодчик А.В., Акатов Н.Б., Бухвалов Н.Ю., Пустовойт К.С. (2013). От самоорганизации к саморазвитию: смена парадигмы менеджмента. Екатеринбург : Ин-т экономики УрО РАН. 257 с.
5. Молодчик А.В., Комаров С.В., Эсаулова И.А., Димитракиев Д. (2019). Механизмы и формы самоорганизации и саморазвития : Монография. Пермь : Издательство Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. 254 с.
6. Назаров Д.М. (2016). Теоретические и методические основы нечетко-множественной оценки имплицитных факторов управления организацией: диссертация на соискание ученой степе- ни доктора экономических наук / Назаров Дмитрий Михайлович ; ФГБОУ ВО Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет. Санкт- Петербург. 340 с.
7. Попов Е.В., Симонова В.Л., Челак И.П. (2020). Оценка развития инновационных эко- систем // Вопросы инновационной экономики. Т. 10. № 4. С. 2359–2374.
8. Markov D., Markova N., Chernovalova G. (2021). Impact of information-infrastructure mech- anism of self-development management at industrial enterprises on employee engagement: empirical evi- dence. In: Proceedings of the X International Scien- tific and Practical Conference “Shumpeterov Reed- ings”. Perm.
9. Babkin A., Mylnikova E., Chernovalova G., Belmas S., Nagibina N. (2021). Information and In- frastructure Mechanism for Managing Industrial En- terprise Self-Development in the Setting of Industrial Digital Transformation. In: Proceedings of the XIV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGRO- MASH 2021”. Pp. 762–770.
10. Козина Е.В. (2016). Практическая про- грамма революционных преобразований «20 ключей» – современный подход к модернизации предприятий // Интернет-журнал «НАУ- КОВЕДЕНИЕ». Т. 8. № 2. 14 с.
11. Русякова М.С. (2014). Обзор современных моделей оценки зрелости управления проекта- ми // Молодой ученый. № 11 (70). С. 230–236.
12. Баландин Е.С., Юдаева В.Г. (2003). Между- народные стандарты ИСО серии 9000-2000: Методические рекомендации по применению. Ульяновск : УлГТУ. 90 с.
13. Теслинов А.Г., Теслинова Е.А. (2021). Управляй решениями. Как думать, чтобы решать и действовать. М. : ФЛИНТА. 240 с.
14. Moore J.F. (2014). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition, Harvard Business review, no. 71, pp. 76–86.
15. Толстых Т.О., Агаева А.М. (2020). Экосистемный подход как концепция инновационного развития экономики // Наука сегодня: вызовы и решения : Материалы Международной научно- практической конференции. Вологда : Маркер. С. 73.
16. Шмелева Н.В., Агаева А.М. (2020). Методика оценки уровня зрелости экономической безопасности предприятий в промышленных экосистемах // РЕГИОН: системы, экономика, управление. № 4 (51). С. 126–143.
17. Толстых Т.О., Шкарупета Е.В. (2019). Влияние человеческого потенциала на формирование цифровой экосистемы в рамках кросс- отраслевой трансформации // Актуальные проблемы развития хозяйствующих субъектов, территорий и систем регионального и муниципального управления : Материалы ХIV Международной научно-практической конференции. Курск : Издательство Юго-Западного государственного университета. С. 210–213.
18. Клейнер Г.Б. (2019). Экономика экосистем: шаг в будущее // Экономическое возрождение России. № 1 (50). С. 40–45.
19. Конопатов С.Н., Салиенко Н.В. (2018). Анализ бизнес моделей на основе платформ // Научный журнал НИУ ИТМО. Серия «Экономика и экологический менеджмент». № 1. С. 21–32.
20. Cobben D., Ooms W., Roijakkers N., Radziwon A. (2022). Ecosystem types: A systematic re- view on boundaries and goals, Journal of Business Research, vol. 142, pp. 138–164.
21. Пучкова Е.М., Синицына И.В., Никулина О.Н. (2021). Развитие бизнес экосистем в современных условиях // KANT. № 2 (39). С. 91–95.
22. Брюханов Д.Ю., Фан Ц., Ван Г. (2020). Организационное совершенство: модель EFQM- 2020 и перспективы ее применения // Шумпетеровские чтения : Материалы девятой международной научно-практической конференции. Пермь : Издательство Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. С. 36–47.
23. Самородова Л.Л., Шутько Л.Г., Якунина Ю.С. (2019). Цифровые экосистемы и экономическая сложность региона как факторы инновационного развития // Вопросы инновационной экономики. Т. 9. № 2. С. 401–409.
24. Trevisan A.H., Castro C.G., Gomes L.A.V., Mascarenhas J. (2022). Unlocking the circular ecosystem concept: Evolution, current research, and future directions. Sustainable Production and Con- sumption, no. 29, pp. 286–298.
25. Официальная версия программного продукта SmartPLS. URL: https://smartpls.com/ ( дата обращения: 22.02.2022).
26. Moore J.F. (2015). Business ecosystems and the view from the firm, The Antitrust Bulletin. Fall, pp. 58.
27. Scaliza J.A.A., Jugend D., Jabbour C.J.C., La- tan H., Armellini F., Twigg D., Andrade D.F. (2022). Relationships among organizational culture, open innovation, innovative ecosystems, and performance of firms: Evidence from an emerging economy context, Journal of Business Research, vol. 140, February,
pp. 264–279.
28. Тен В.В. (2019). Бизнес-экосистемы //«Цифра» – реальность, меняющая мир: готовность российской экономики к новым прав и правилам игры : Материалы Национальной научно- практической конференции. М. С. 169–171.
29. Клейнер Г.Б. (2019). Экономика экосистем: шаг в будущее // Экономическое возрождение России. № 1 (50). С. 40–45.
REFERENCES
1. Lalu F. (2016). Opening the organization of the future. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber. 432 p.
2. Shumpeter J. (1982). The theory of economic development: a study of entrepreneurial profit, cap- ital, loan, percentage and cycle of conjuncture. Moscow: Progress. 455 p.
3. Molodchik A.V. (2001). Theory and practice of forming a self-developing organization. Ekaterin- burg: Institute of Economics of URO RAS. 246 p.
4. Komarov S.V., Molodchik A.V., Akatov N.B., Bukhvalov N.Yu., Pustovoyt K.S. (2013). From self- organization to self-development: change paradigm. Ekaterinburg: Institute of Economics of URO RAS. 257 p.
5. Molodchik A.V., Komarov S.V., Esaulova I.A., Dimitrakiev D. (2019). Mechanisms and forms of self-organization and self-development. Perm: Publishing House of the Perm National Research Polytechnic University. 254 p.
6. Nazarov D.M. (2016). Theoretical and methodological foundations of a fuzzy-multiple as- sessment of implicit management factors of the organization. Advanced Doctor’s degree dissertation. St. Petersburg State University. St. Petersburg. 340 p.
7. Popov E.V., Simonova V.L., Chelak I.P. (2020). Evaluation of the development of innovative ecosystems, Questions of the innovation economy, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2359–2374.
8. Markov D., Markova N., Chernovalova G. (2021). Impact of information-infrastructure mechanism of self-development management at industrial enterprises on employee engagement: empirical evidence. In: Proceedings of the X International Scien- tific and Practical Conference “Shumpeterov Reedings”. Perm.
9. Babkin A., Mylnikova E., Chernovalova G., Belmas S., Nagibina N. (2021). Information and Infrastructure Mechanism for Managing Industrial En- terprise Self-Development in the Setting of Industrial Digital Transformation. In: Proceedings of the XIV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGRO- MASH 2021”. Pp. 762–770.
10. Kozina E.V. (2016). The practical program of revolutionary transformations “20 keys” – a modern approach to the modernization of enterprises, Network journal “Sciences”, vol. 8, no. 2, 14 p.
11. Rusyakova M.S. (2014). Overview of modern models for assessing the maturity of project management, Young scientist, no. 11 (70), pp. 230–236.
12. Balandin E.S., Yudaeva V.G. (2003). International standards of ISO series 9000-2000: Methodical recommendations for use. Ulyanovsk: UlGTU. 90 p.
13. Teslinov A.G., Teslinova E.A. (2021). Manage solutions. How to think to decide and act. Moscow: FLINTA. 240 p.
14. Moore J.F. (2014). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition, Harvard Business review, no. 71, pp. 76–86.
15. Tolstykh T.O., Agaeva A.M. (2020). Ecosys- tem approach as the concept of innovative develop- ment of the economy. In: Proceedings of the Interna- tional Scientific and Practical Conference “Science Today: Challenges and Solutions”. Vologda: Marker. P. 73.
16. Shmeleva N.V., Agaeva A.M. (2020). Methods of assessing the level of maturity of the economic security of enterprises in industrial ecosystems, Re- gion: Systems, Economics, Management, no. 4 (51), pp. 126–143.
17. Tolstykh T.O., Shkarupeta E.V. (2019). The in- fluence of human potential on the formation of a digital ecosystem in the framework of cross-sectoral transformation. In: Proceedings of the XIV Inter- national Scientific and Practical Conference “Actual problems of the development of economic entities, territories and systems of regional and munic- ipal management”. Kursk: Publishing House of the South-West State University, pp. 210–213.
18. Kleiner G.B. (2019). Economy of Ecosystems: Step into the Future, Economic Revival of Russia, no. 1 (50), pp. 40–45.
19. Konopatov S.N., Salienko N.V. (2018). Analy- sis of business models based on platforms, Scientific Journal of NIU ITMO. Series “Economics and Envi- ronmental Management”, no. 1, pp. 21–32.
20. Cobben D., Ooms W., Roijakkers N., Radzi- won A. (2022). Ecosystem types: A systematic re- view on boundaries and goals, Journal of Business Re- search, vol. 142, pp. 138–164.
21. Puchkova E.M., Sinitsina I.V., Nikulina O.N. (2021). Development of business ecosystems in modern conditions, KANT, no. 2 (39), pp. 91–95.
22. Brukhanov D.Yu., Fan C., Wang G. (2020). Organizational perfection: EFQM-2020 model and its prospects for its application. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Scientific and Practical Con- ference “Shumpeterov’s readings”. Perm: Publishing House of the Perm National Research Polytechnic University, pp. 36–47.
23. Samorodova L.L., Shutko L.G., Yakunina Yu.S. (2019). Digital ecosystems and economic complexity of the region as factors of innovative development,
Questions of the innovation economy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 401–409.
24. Trevisan A.H., Castro C.G., Gomes L.A.V., Mascarenhas J. (2022). Unlocking the circular ecosystem concept: Evolution, current research, and future directions. Sustainable Production and Con- sumption, no. 29, pp. 286–298.
25. The official version of the SmartPLS software product. URL: https://smartpls.com/ (accessed 02.22.2022).
26. Moore J.F. (2015). Business ecosystems and the view from the firm, The Antitrust Bulletin. Fall, pp. 58.
27. Scaliza J.A.A., Jugend D., Jabbour C.J.C., La- tan H., Armellini F., Twigg D., Andrade D.F. (2022). Relationships among organizational culture, open innovation, innovative ecosystems, and performance of firms: Evidence from an emerging economy con- text, Journal of Business Research, vol. 140, February,
pp. 264–279.
28. Ten V.V. (2019). Business ecosystems. In: Pro- ceedings of the National Scientific and Practical Conference “ ‘Digit’ – reality changing world: the readiness of the Russian economy to the new rules of the game”. Moscow. Pp. 169–171.
29. Kleiner G.B. (2019). Economy of Ecosystems: Step into the Future, Economic Revival of Russia, no. 1 (50), pp. 40–45.
