PARTICIPATORY MODEL OF STRATEGIC PLANNING IN SCIENCE-INTENSIVE SUBSIDIARIESOF OIL AND GAS COMPANIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2023-5-19-31Keywords:
vertically integrated oil and gas companies, science-intensive enterprises, subsidiaries, strate- gic planning, strategic instruments, oil and gas industry, Russian industryAbstract
Introduction. In modern conditions, the number of factors, affecting the strategic planning of vertically integrated oil and gas companies’ future in the Russian Federation is growing. At the same time, the need for technological development of the Russian oil and gas industry is one of the most significant challenges. As a result, new challenges arise for industry science, which means that science-intensive subsidiaries are be- coming more significant, and their importance for the sustainable functioning of parent oil and gas compa- nies is growing. In this regard, the task of competent strategic planning of the science-intensive subsidiaries’ future is becoming increasingly important. This in turn requires updating strategic planning tools, taking into account new factors affecting the industry and trends in the oil and gas enterprises’ management.
Methods and methodology. The theoretical and methodological foundations of the study are the works of Russian and foreign scientists and specialists in the research topic, as well as data from Russian vertically in- tegrated oil and gas companies on the number and types of their subsidiaries, presented in the public domain. Within the framework of the study, methods of analysis and synthesis, analogy, and comparison were applied. Results. The strategic planning tools based on participation - a phenomenon of involving employees in management processes of an industrial enterprise – is developed. A new model of strategic planning is pro- posed and its algorithm is given that refers to the specifics of science-intensive subsidiaries and manage- ment features of vertically integrated oil and gas companies within the framework of the method used to decide on the expediency of applying a participatory approach. The model also considers the employees’ interests by assessing their readiness to participate in strategic planning and remains within the framework
of industry specifics due to the choice of strategic planning methods included in the organizational plan.
Discussion. The proposed algorithm can meet the challenges and conditions in which science-intensive subsidiaries of vertically integrated oil and gas companies operate and therefore can be useful to managers and managers of such enterprises. However, its direct application depends on the human factor, expressed in readiness for participation, and requires a formal study of methodological forms and recommendations.
References
1. ЕРЕМИНА И. Ю., АБДУЛКАДЫРОВ А. С., ЭЙРИХ Г. О. Развитие инновационных форм занято- сти в нефтегазовых компаниях // Индустриальная экономика. 2022. № 1-1. С. 54–59. DOI 10.47576/ 2712-7559_2022_1_1_54. EDN EOMIYH.
2. МИЧУРИНА О. Ю., ДУБИНИНА Н. А. Стимулирование изобретательской и рационализаторской деятельности в нефтегазовой отрасли // Вестник Астраханского государственного технического университета. Серия: Экономика.
2021. № 4. С. 72–79. DOI 10.24143/2073-5537-2021-4-72-79. EDN XPYJFQ.
3. TANG, H., RASOOL, Z., SINDHU, M. I., NAVEED, M., & BABAR, S. F. (2023). Implications of corporate innovation investment on environment sustainabil- ity with moderating role of managerial stock incen- tives: A case of the oil and gas sector of the United States of America. Frontiers in Environmental Sci- ence, 10, Article 962258. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fenvs.2022.962258.
4. КАЧЕЛИН А. С. Международное сотрудничество как фактор научно-технологического развития в нефтегазовой отрасли Российской Феде- рации // Экономическая безопасность. 2023. Т. 6, № 1. С. 385–412. DOI 10.18334/ecsec.6.1.117374. EDN OZWXDI.
5. ВОЛКОВ А. Т., ШЕПЕЛЕВ Р. Е. Современное со- стояние нефтегазовой отрасли – источника спроса инноваций // Вестник университета. 2019. № 6. С. 68–76. DOI 10.26425/1816-4277-2019-6-68-76. EDN WBBYRB.
6. ТОКАРЕВ А. Н. Подход к анализу инновационного развития нефтегазового комплекса России: структура патентов на изобретения // Интер экспо Гео-Сибирь. 2021. Т. 3, № 1. С. 101–106. DOI 10.33764/2618-981X-2021-3-1-101-106. EDN UTQZZG.
7. ЛОБОВ Д. С. Оценка инвестиционной и патентной активности отечественных и зарубежных нефтегазовых, нефтехимических компаний в рамках реализации энергетической стратегии Российской Федерации на период до 2035 года // Друкеровский вестник. 2020. № 5 (37). С. 137–150. DOI 10.17213/2312-6469-2020-5-137-150. EDN KPQHVK.
8. ФАДЕЕВ А. М., ЧЕРЕПОВИЦЫН А. Е., ЛАРИЧКИН Ф. Д. Устойчивое развитие нового добывающего региона при реализации нефтегазовых проектов на шельфе Арктики // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2012. № 1 (19). С. 27–38. EDN OQRMPP.
9. АБДУЛКАДЫРОВ А. С., МАЛЬСАГОВА Х. С. Современная проблематика импортозамещения критического оборудования в нефтегазовой отрасли России // Журнал прикладных исследований. 2022. Т. 4, № 6. С. 306–310. DOI 10.47576/2712- 7516_2022_6_4_306. EDN QAJAIU.
10. ОСИНОВСКАЯ И. В., ПЛЕНКИНА М. В. Кадровый потенциал в контексте обеспечения долго- срочного устойчивого развития нефтяной компании // Вестник Академии знаний. 2020. № 36 (1). С. 187–191. DOI 10.24411/2304-6139-2020-00034. EDN WERQJI.
11. ПОЛУКЕЕВА А. В. Особенности управления инновационной деятельностью промышленного предприятия // Организатор производства. 2015. № 4 (67). С. 109–117. EDN VLJVQB.
12. ЯРОВОВА Т. В., ШАРОПУТО И. М. Стратегическое управление инновационными проектами в компаниях нефтегазового сектора // Московский экономический журнал. 2023. Т. 8, № 1. DOI 10.55186/2413046X_2023_8_1_3. EDN ITGCYB.
13. MAMULA, T., & POPOVIC-PANTIC, S. (2015). Relationship between innovativeness and strategic planning: Empirical research. Industrija, 43(4), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.5937/industrija43-8718.
14. AL-AWAWDEH, W. M. (2017). Strategic planning and innovation: A case study of Jordan University of Science and Technology. International Business Research, 10(9), Article 159. https://doi.org/10.553 9/ibr.v10n9p159.
15. ЧУСОВИТИН Д. Ю. Особенности стратегического планирования развития предприятия (на примере ПАО «Газпром нефть») // Инновации и инвестиции. 2021. № 5. С. 95–98. EDN OLQQPG.
16. ДЕГТЯРЕВА В. В., ЛОЖНИКОВА Д. А. Форсайт как инструмент технологического планирования в управлении ПАО «Газпром» в эпоху цифровизации // Вестник университета. 2020. № 4. С. 54–62. DOI 10.26425/1816-4277-2020-4-54-62. EDN CEUYJZ.
17. ПОТУДАНСКАЯ В. Ф., АЛИФЕР Е. О. Развитие партисипативного управления на промышленных предприятиях // Креативная экономика. 2016. Т. 10, № 2. С. 197–210. DOI 10.18334/ce.10.2.35001. EDN VOFQGH.
18. BÖRNFELT, P. -O. (2023). Sustainable Work Organisations. In Work Organisation in Practice: From Taylorism to Sustainable Work Organisations (pp. 163–175). Palgrave Macmillan Cham. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21667-1_10.
19. KARBASI, B. J., & RAHMANSERESHT, H. (2019).
Participative strategic planning and innovation capability: Moderating role of ideation strategy. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(7), Article 2050066. https://doi.org/10.1142/ s1363919620500668.
REFERENCES
1. EREMINA, I. YU., ABDULKADYROV, A. S., & EURICH, G. O. (2022). Development of innovative forms of employment in oil and gas companies. Industrial Economics, (1-1), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.47576/ 2712-7559_2022_1_1_54.
2. MICHURINA, O. YU., & DUBININA, N. A. (2021). Stimulattion of inventive and innovative activities in oil and gas industry. Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Economics, (4), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.24143/2073-5537-2021-4-72-79.
3. TANG, H., RASOOL, Z., SINDHU, M. I., NAVEED, M., & BABAR, S. F. (2023). Implications of corporate innovation investment on environment sustainabil- ity with moderating role of managerial stock incen- tives: A case of the oil and gas sector of the United States of America. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, Article 962258. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fenvs.2022.962258.
4. KACHELIN, A. S. (2023). International coopera- tion as a factor of science and technology develop- ment in the oil and gas industry of the Russian Fed- eration. Economic Security, 6(1), 385–412. https:// doi.org/10.18334/ecsec.6.1.117374.
5. VOLKOV, A. T., & SHEPELEV, R. E. (2019). Current state of the oil and gas industry as a source of demand of innovations. Vestnik Universiteta, (6), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2019-6-68-76.
6. TOKAREV, A. N. (2021). Approach to analysis of innovative development of the oil and gas sector of Russia: Structure of patents for inventions. Interexpo Geo-Siberia, 3(1), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.337 64/2618-981X-2021-3-1-101-106.
7. LOBOV, D. S. (2020). Measuring oil and gas corporations’ investment and patent activities ac- cording to the energy strategy 2035 of the Russian Federation. Drucker Herald, (5), 137–150. https:// doi.org/10.17213/2312-6469-2020-5-137-150.
8. FADEEV, A. M., CHEREPOVITSYN, A. E., & LARICHKIN, F. D. (2012). Sustainable development of a new extractive region in the oil and gas project activity on the arctic shelf. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, (1), 27–38. https://elibrary. ru/oqrmpp.
9. ABDULKADYROV, A. S., & MALSAGOVA, KH. S. (2022). Modern issues of import substitution criti- cal equipment in the Russian oil and gas industry. Journal of Applied Research, 4(6), 306–310. https:// doi.org/10.47576/2712-7516_2022_6_4_306.
10. OSINOVSKAYA, I. V., & PLENKINA, M. V. (2020). Human resources potential in the context of long- term sustainable development of the oil company. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge, (36), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.24411/2304-6139-2020-00034.
11. POLUKEEVA, A. V. (2015). The peculiarities of managing the innovative activity of an industrial company. Organizer of Production, (4), 109–117. https://elibrary.ru/vljvqb.
12. YAROVOVA, T. V., & SHAROPUTO, I. M. (2023). Strategic management of innovative projects in oil and gas sector companies. Moscow Economic Journal, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.55186/2413046X_2023_8_1_3.
13. MAMULA, T., & POPOVIC-PANTIC, S. (2015). Relationship between innovativeness and strategic planning: Empirical research. Industrija, 43(4), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.5937/industrija43-8718.
14. ALAWAWDEH, W. M. (2017). Strategic plan- ning and innovation: A case study of Jordan Univer- sity of Science and Technology. International Busi- ness Research, 10(9), Article 159. https://doi.org/ 10.5539/ibr.v10n9p159.
15. CHUSOVITIN, D. YU. (2021). Features of strate- gic planning of enterprise development (on the example of Gazprom Neft PJSC). Innovation and Investment, (5), 95–98. https://elibrary.ru/olqqpg.
16. DEGTYAREVA, V. V., & LOZHNIKOVA, D. A. (2020). Foresight as a tool of technological planning in the management of Public Joint Stock Company “Gaz- prom” in the era of digitalization. Vestnik Universi- teta, (4), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277- 2020-4-54-62.
17. POTUDANSKAYA, V. F., & ALIFER, E. O. (2016).The participative management development at the industrial enterprises. Creative Economy, 10(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.10.2.35001.
18. BÖRNFELT, P. -O. (2023). Sustainable Work Organisations. In Work Organisation in Practice: From Taylorism to Sustainable Work Organisations (pp. 163–175). Palgrave Macmillan Cham. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21667-1_10.
19. KARBASI, B. J., & RAHMANSERESHT, H. (2019). Participative strategic planning and innovation capability: Moderating role of ideation strategy. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(7), Article 2050066. https://doi.org/10.1142/ s1363919620500668.
