CLOSED ATOMIC CITY AS A “PROJECT CITY”: SOCIOLOGIST’S VIEW

Authors

  • Sergey M. Karachkov Уральский институт управления, Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации Автор https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-8741

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2023-5-5-17

Keywords:

Novouralsk, ZATO (Closed Administrative Territoral Entity), design, project city, sociology of the city, typology of cities, value core of corporatism, corporatism

Abstract

Introduction. The article considers the project city as a separate type of sociological classification based on the analysis of the creation and development of closed administrative-territorial entities.

Materials and methods. Based on the project approach, the concept of "project cities" was formed as a special type in the sociological classification. The selected criteria for project cities and their further oper- ationalization made it possible to conduct an empirical study using the methods of quantitative and quali- tative sociological analysis. The data of 2012 and 2022 questionnaire surveys are presented, within the frame- work of which quantitative indicators of the formation and manifestations of the value core of corporatism in the assessments of ZATO residents were analyzed. Residents of the city of Novouralsk directly related to the implementation of the Atomic Project (that is, those working at the head enterprise of UEIP, in public bod- ies and local self-government) were interviewed. A target quota sample was used, the size of the sample, based on the city size, amounted to 1880 people. (935 people in 2012 and 945 people in 2022) of respondents.

To analyze ZATO management problems in the transition period qualitative research methods were used: interviews conducted in 2012 (N = 30) and in 2022 (N = 30). Representatives of the key group actors of interaction of ZATO Novouralsk were selected as experts: employees of UEIP, municipal employees, members of public organizations, trade union workers, representatives of urban workers and engineering dynasties, hereditary residents of the closed city.

Results. Consideration of the experience of creating and developing ZATOs allows us to talk about the need to supplement the existing classification of cities with a separate type – a “project city”. Here, in par- ticular, as the empirical study has shown, both a special urban lifestyle and special urban values, culture, practices of identification, communication, representation, formation and reproduction of special urban social practices are revealed. For example, as a result of surveys and interviews, it was possible to record and describe the features of the value core of corporatism underlying the social management of ZATOs. The core of values lies in the readiness to fulfill an important state task, the desire to consolidate efforts, the formation of values that unite self-realization and increase the social status of ZATO residents as accomplices in the nu- clear project, and the goal of this project is to ensure the national security of the country.

Discussion. Identification of the value core of corporatism as a conceptual basis for the implementation of project city management is of particular importance, taking into account the need for the integrated de- velopment of new territories of the Russian Federation, focused on the implementation of important state tasks in the field of re-industrialization, technological breakthrough, national security, the formation of a nation- al idea, etc. For tasks of this kind, city-sites for the implementation of projects are needed – “project cities”.

Author Biography

  • Sergey M. Karachkov, Уральский институт управления, Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации

    Ph. D. (Sociology); Ural Institute of Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration — researcher at the Center for Socio-Economic Research (66, 8 Marta St., Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russia)

References

1. RHODES, R. (2015). Why the Manhattan Project should be preserved. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71(6), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340215611077.

2. ЛАЗАРЕНКО В. А. Социальное развитие городов атомной электроэнергетики России (на примере Десногорска) // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета. Серия: Политические, социологические и экономические науки. 2018. № 1. С. 6–13. DOI 10.21603/2500-3372-2018-1-6-13. EDN YUUCXI.

3. ФАЙКОВ Д. Ю., БАЙДАРОВ Д. Ю. Учет особенностей закрытых атомных городов в стратегиях социально-экономического развития разного уровня // ЭТАП: экономическая теория, анализ, практика. 2022. № 4. С. 28–48. DOI 10.24412/2071-6435-2022-4-28-48. EDN UOKJWB.

4. ГАНИЕВА И. А., ШЕПЕЛЕВ Г. В. Проектный и процессный подходы в науке // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2023. Т. 5, № 1. С. 33–51. DOI 10.19181/smtp.2023.5.1.2. EDN CDJZZN.

5. БЕЛОЗЕРОВ В. С., СОЛОВЬЕВ И. А., ЩИТОВА Н. А., СОПНЕВ Н. В. Типология городов-центров городских агломераций по характеру демографического развития (на примере Европейской России) // Известия Российской академии наук. Серия географическая. 2022. Т. 86, № 5. С. 665–675. DOI 10.31857/S2587556622050041. EDN RZREZC.

6. ЗВЕРЕВ А. И., КАРАЧКОВ С. М. Корпоративная модель социального управления атомным ЗАТО: основания теоретической реконструкции// Управленец. 2012. № 9-10 (37-38). С. 13–17. EDN PWYZQR.

7. ПОПОВ Е. А. Основные возможности исследования города в современной социологической науке // Социодинамика. 2021. № 2. С. 65–

72. DOI 10.25136/2409-7144.2021.2.34838. EDN MBBLVF.

8. ГЕДДЕС П. Города в эволюции (избранные главы) // Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Серия 11: Социология. 2021. № 3. С. 149–177. EDN GWXPCC.

9. ТЕННИС Ф. Общность и общество // Социологический журнал. 1998. № 3-4. С. 206–229. EDN PZQJXL.

10. ПАРК Р., БАНЬКОВСКАЯ С. Город как социальная лаборатория // Социологическое обозрение. 2002. Т. 2, № 3. С. 3–12. EDN TWMRNL.

11. OGUTU, F. A., KIMATA, D. M., & KWEYU, R. M. (2020). Partnerships for sustainable cities as options for improving solid waste management in Nairobi city. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 39(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x20967735.

12. ПОБЕРЕЖНИКОВ И. В., МЕЛЬНИКОВА Н. В. Повседневность закрытых атомных городов СССР // Труды Отделения историко-филологических наук РАН / под ред. В. А. Тишкова. Москва : Российская академия наук, 2021. С. 35–50. DOI 10.26158/OIFN.2021.10.1.003. EDN TGXGJF.

13. ОГОРОДОВ А. С., САРАНЧУК С. Ю., ЧЕВТАЕВА Н. Г. Корпоративная сплоченность профессионального сообщества в условиях нестабильности рынка труда промышленного региона // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология. 2017. Т. 17, № 1. С. 83–95. DOI 10.22363/2313-2272-2017-17-1-83-

95. EDN XWEZDR.

14. ЗАГУЛЯЕВА З. А. Факторы формирования социокультурного пространства закрытых атомных городов // Научные школы. Молодежь в науке и культуре XXI века : материалы Международного научно-творческого форума (научной конференции) (Челябинск, 24-25 ноября 2022 г.) / под ред. М. Л. Шуб. Челябинск: Челябинский государственныйинституткультуры, 2023. С.41–45. EDN LTSVME.

15. ТОЛСТИКОВ В. С. К вопросу о социокультурном развитии Южного Урала в 1960-1970-е гг // Научные школы. Молодежь в науке и куль- туре XXI века : материалы Международного научно-творческого форума (научной конференции) (Челябинск) / под ред. М. Л. Шуб. Челябинск : Челябинский государственный институт культуры, 2023. С. 220–225. EDN TQTFCS.

16. KHRIPUNOV, I., & KATSVA, M. (2002). Russia’snuclear industry: The next generation. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 58(2), 51–57. https://doi.org/ 10.2968/058002015.

17. ЗВЕРЕВ А. И. Формирование методологии социологического анализа «проектного» города (на примере исследования социальной среды г. Иннополис) // Вопросы управления. 2023. № 1 (80). С. 33–44. DOI 10.22394/2304-3369-2023-1-33-44. EDN LBPELA.

18. ГАВРИЛОВА О. М. Ограничения методологий управления проектами и пути их преодоления (на примере PMBoK) // Ученые записки. 2022. № 2 (42). С. 8–12. EDN NEKNDJ.

19. КАРАЧКОВ С. М. Пространство проектирования атомного ЗАТО: проявления ценностного ядра корпоративности в социальной идентичности по результатам эмпирического исследования // Экономика: вчера, сегодня, завтра. 2022. Т. 12, № 3-1. С. 213–222. DOI 10.34670/AR.2022. 29.12.025. EDN ULGIWB.

20. ЧЕРНЯТИН Д. М. Реструктуризация как ос- нова конкурентоспособности градообразующих предприятий ЗАТО Госкорпорации «Роса- том» // Региональные проблемы преобразования экономики. 2019. № 12 (110). С. 30–39. DOI 10.26726/1812-7096-2019-12-30-39. EDN XFXTKD. REFERENCES

1. RHODES, R. (2015). Why the Manhattan Project should be preserved. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71(6), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340215611077.

2. LAZARENKO, V. A. (2018). Social development of Russians nuclear power cities (the case of Des- nogorsk). Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological And Economic Sciences, (1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2018-1-6-13.

3. FAYKOV, D. YU., & BAYDAROV, D. YU. (2022). Taking into account the peculiarities of closed nuclear cities in the strategic development plans of various levels. ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, Practice, (4), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-

6435-2022-4-28-48.

4. GANIEVA, I. A., & SHEPELEV, G. V. (2023). Projectand Process Approaches in Science. Science Man- agement: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 33–51. https:// doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2023.5.1.2.

5. BELOZEROV, V. S., SOLOVIEV, I. A., SHCHITOVA, N. A., & SOPNEV, N. V. (2022). Typology of core cities of urban agglomerations on the basis of de- mographic development (on the example of Euro- pean Russia). Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, 86(5), 665–675. https:// doi.org/10.31857/S2587556622050041.

6. ZVEREV, A. I., & KARACHKOV, S. M. (2012). Corporate model of social governance of atomic ZATO: The bases of theoretical reconstruction. The Man- ager, (9-10), 13–17. https://elibrary.ru/pwyzqr.

7. POPOV, E. A. (2021). Basic options of studying cities in the modern sociological science. Sociody- namics, (2), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7144.2021.2.34838.

8. (2021). Cities in evolution (selected chapters). Social Sciences and Humanities. Domestic and For- eign Literature. Series 11: Sociology, (3), 149–177. https://elibrary.ru/gwxpcc.

9. (1998). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft (transl. from German by A.N. Malinkin). Sociological Journal, (3-4), 206–229. https://elibrary.ru/pzqjxl.

10. PARK, R., & BANKOVSKAYA, S. (2002). The city as a social laboratory. Russian Sociological Review, 2(3), 3–12. https://elibrary.ru/twmrnl.

11. OGUTU, F. A., KIMATA, D. M., & KWEYU, R. M. (2020). Partnerships for sustainable cities as options for improving solid waste management in Nairobi city. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 39(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x20967735.

12. POBEREZHNIKOV, I. V., & MELNIKOVA, N. V. (2021). Everyday life of closed nuclear cities of the USSR. In V. A. Tishkov (Ed.) Proceedings of the Department of Historical and Philological Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences (pp. 35–50). Russian Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/ 10.26158/OIFN.2021.10.1.003.

13. OGORODOV, A. S., SARANCHUK, S. YU., & CHEVTAEVA, N. G. (2017). Corporate professional unity under the unstable labor market in the industrial re- gion. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 17(1), 83–95. https:// doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2017-17-1-83-95.

14. ZAGULYAEVA, Z. A. (2023). Factors in the for- mation of the socio-cultural space of closed nuclear cities. In M. L. Shub (Ed.) Scientific schools. Youth in science and culture of the 21st century (pp. 41– 45). Chelyabinsk State Institute of Culture. https:// elibrary.ru/ltsvme.

15. (2023). About socio-cultural development of the Southern Urals in the 1960-1970thyears. In M.L.Shub (Ed.) Scientific schools. Youth in science and culture of the 21st century (pp. 220–225). Chelyabinsk State Institute of Culture. https://elibrary.ru/tqtfcs.

16. KHRIPUNOV, I., & KATSVA, M. (2002). Russia’snuclear industry: The next generation. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 58(2), 51–57. https://doi.org/ 10.2968/058002015.

17. ZVEREV, A. I. (2023). Developing the sociolog- ical analysis methodology of the “project” city (using the social environment research of the city of innop- olis as an example). Management Issues, (1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2023-1-33-44.

18. GAVRILOVA, O. M. (2022). The limitations of project management methodologies and means to overcome it (on example of PMBoK). Scientists Notes, (2), 8–12. https://elibrary.ru/nekndj.

19. KARACHKOV, S. M. (2022). Design space for nuclear closed cities: Manifestations of the value core of corporatism in social identity based on the results of an empirical study. Economics: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, 12(3-1), 213–222. https://doi.org/ 10.34670/AR.2022.29.12.025.

20. CHERNYATIN, D. M. (2019). Restructuring as a basis for competitiveness city-forming enterprises of Rosatom state corporation. Regional Problems of Economic Transformation, (12), 30–39. https://doi. org/10.26726/1812-7096-2019-12-30-39.

Published

2025-04-01

Issue

Section

Government and public administration

How to Cite

Karachkov, S. M. (2025). CLOSED ATOMIC CITY AS A “PROJECT CITY”: SOCIOLOGIST’S VIEW. Management Issues, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2023-5-5-17