<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2304-3369</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="eissn">2308-8842</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы управления</journal-title>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Management issues</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="edn">WTNRHA</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title xml:lang="ru">ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИЙ ИСКУССТВЕННОГО ИНТЕЛЛЕКТА В ЗДРАВООХРАНЕНИИ: ОЖИДАНИЯ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ</article-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
          <trans-title>THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN HEALTHCARE: PUBLIC EXPECTATIONS</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="eastern">
            <surname>Назаров</surname>
            <given-names>М. М.</given-names>
          </name>
          <name-alternatives>
            <name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru">
              <surname>Назаров</surname>
              <given-names>М. М.</given-names>
            </name>
            <name name-style="western" xml:lang="en">
              <surname>Nazarov</surname>
              <given-names>M.M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </name-alternatives>
          <email>vy175867@yandex.ru</email>
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-9099-981X</contrib-id>
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">7005571997</contrib-id>
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="researcherid">L-7449-2015</contrib-id>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff-alternatives id="aff1">
          <aff>
            <institution xml:lang="ru">Институт социально-политических исследований Федерального научно-исследовательского социологического центра Российской академии наук (Москва, Россия)</institution>
          </aff>
          <aff>
            <institution xml:lang="en">Institute of Socio-Political Research of the Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia)</institution>
          </aff>
        </aff-alternatives>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2025-01-01">
        <day>01</day>
        <month>01</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date date-type="collection">
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>58</fpage>
      <lpage>71</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-01-13">
          <day>13</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-03-31">
          <day>31</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd" iso-8601-date="2025-03-10">
          <day>10</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© М.М. Назаров, 2025</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
        <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/">
          <license-p>CC BY-NC 4.0</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract xml:lang="ru">
        <p>Введение. Внедрение технологий искусственного интеллекта (ИИ) в здравоохранение относится к приоритетным стратегическим направлениям развития отрасли. Актуальными являются задачи понимания социальных следствий технологических инноваций. В работе представлен анализ эмпирических данных об ожиданиях российского населения в связи с перспективами широкого использования технологий ИИ в здравоохранении.&#13;
&#13;
Материалы и методы. Информационной базой работы являются данные репрезентативного исследования населения Москвы и Московской области в возрасте от 18 лет и старше, проведенного в 2024 г. Использовалась система показателей и эмпирических индикаторов, позволяющая охарактеризовать различные стороны отношения к использованию ИИ в здравоохранении в контексте социальных оценок и поведенческих ориентаций респондентов. Анализ данных проводился с использованием методов дискриптивной статистики и модели логистической регрессии.&#13;
&#13;
Результаты. Выявлено, что положительные ожидания от использования ИИ в здравоохранении оказываются статистически более выраженными по сравнению с негативными ожиданиями, отражающими возможные риски использования ИИ.Среди положительных ожиданий чаще других респонденты отмечали повышение результативности лечения (61%); несколько в меньшей степени - снижение затрат на лечение, расширение возможностей лечения для пациентов, эффективное использование ресурсов медицинских учреждений (56-49%). Негативные оценки, отражающие риски, с которыми может быть сопряжено внедрение ИИ в здравоохранение, - снижение квалификации врачей за счет излишней опоры в работе на технологии; вопросы конфиденциальности; манипуляции данными и предвзятость рекомендаций; отсутствие понимания того, как технологии ИИ формируют рекомендации - получили 51-44% упоминаний. Различия в оценочной направленности ожиданий значимо связаны с возрастом и образованием, а также уровнем удовлетворенности медицинским обслуживанием. На основе использования логистической регрессии были определены переменные, влияющие на доверие медицинскому обслуживанию с широким использованием технологий ИИ. Обсуждение. В массовом сознании существуют разнонаправленные ожидания в связи с внедрением ИИ в здравоохранение. Для успешной адаптации к инновациям целесообразно учитывать проблемные стороны ожиданий, выявленные в ходе исследования. Немаловажным является обеспечение человеческого измерения технологических и организационно-управленческих решений в сфере медицинского обслуживания.</p>
      </abstract>
      <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>Introduction. The introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is one of the priority strategic areas of the industry’s development. The tasks of understanding the social consequences of technological innovations are relevant. The paper presents an analysis of empirical data on the expectations of the Russian population in connection with the prospects for the widespread use of AI technologies in healthcare.&#13;
Materials and methods. Data come from a representative sample of the population aged 18 and older conducted in Moscow and the Moscow region in 2024. The research used system of empirical indicators to characterize various aspects of attitudes toward the use of AI in healthcare in the context of social assessments and behavioral orientations of respondents. Descriptive statistics methods and a logistic regression model applied in a course of data analysis.&#13;
&#13;
Results. It was found that positive expectations from the use of AI in healthcare are statistically more pronounced compared to negative expectations reflecting the possible risks of using AI. Among the positive expectations, respondents most often noted an increase in treatment effectiveness (61%); to a lesser extent - a decrease in treatment costs, an expansion of treatment options for patients, and an efficien use of medical institution resources (56-49%). Negative assessments reflecting the risks that may be associated with the introduction of AI in healthcare - a decrease in the qualifications of doctors due to excessive reliance on technology in their work; privacy issues; data manipulation and bias in recommendations; lack of understanding of how AI technologies form recommendations - received 51-44%. Differences in the evaluative focus of expectations are significantly associated with age and education, as well as the level of satisfaction with medical care. Binary logistic regression model help to identify variables influencing trust in healthcare with extensive use of AI technologies Discussion. The research identified mass consciousness mixed expectations regarding the introduction of AI technologies in healthcare. For successful adaptation to innovation, it is advisable to take into account the problematic aspects of expectations the study considered. It is important to ensure the human dimension of technological and organizational-managerial decisions in the field of medical care.</p>
      </trans-abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="ru">
        <title>Ключевые слова</title>
        <kwd>цифровизация здравоохранения</kwd>
        <kwd>социология медицины</kwd>
        <kwd>принятие инноваций</kwd>
        <kwd>доверие искусственному интеллекту</kwd>
        <kwd>социальные ожидания</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <title>Keywords</title>
        <kwd>digitalization of healthcare</kwd>
        <kwd>sociology of medicine</kwd>
        <kwd>adoption of innovations</kwd>
        <kwd>trust in AI</kwd>
        <kwd>social expectations</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body/>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <label>1</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">1.	Asan, O., Bayrak, F.M., Choudhury, A. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Human Trust in Healthcare: Focus on Clinicians. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), p. e15154. DOI 10.2196/15154. EDN KVOSDV.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <label>2</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">2.	Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quaterly, 13 (3), p. 319-340. DOI 10.2307/249008.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <label>3</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">3.	Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46 (2), pp. 186-204. DOI 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926. EDN FNVBJN.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <label>4</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">4.	Damerji, H., Salimi, D. (2021). Mediating effect of use perceptions on technology readiness and adoption of artificial intelligence in accounting. Accounting Education, 30 (2), pp. 107-130. DOI 10.1080/09639284.2021.1872035. EDN DWMKUI.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <label>5</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">5.	Miltgen, L., Popovic, C., Oliveira, T. (2013). Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: Integrating the "Big 3" of technology acceptance with privacy context. Decision Support Systems, 56, pp. 103-114. DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.010.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <label>6</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">6.	Choung, H., David, P., Ross, A. (2022). Trust in AI and its role in the acceptance of AI technologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39 (9), pp. 1727–1739. DOI 10.1080/10447318.2022.2050543. EDN CUNYAG.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <label>7</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">7.	Zhang, M., Luo, М., Nie, R., Zhang, Y. (2017). Technical attributes, health attribute, consumer attributes and their roles in adoption intention of healthcare wearable technology. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 108, pp. 97-109. DOI 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.09.016.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <label>8</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">8.	Gansser, O.A. Reich, C.S. (2021). A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application. Technology in Society, 65, 101535. DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101535. EDN PDWHAO.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <label>9</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">9.	Ghazizadeh, M., Lee, J.D., Boyle, L.N. (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to assess automation. Cognition, Technology &amp; Work, 14(1), pp. 39-49. DOI 10.1007/s10111-011-0194-3. EDN RSYPNQ.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <label>10</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">10.	Koenig, P.D. (2024) Attitudes toward artificial intelligence: combining three theoretical perspectives on technology acceptance. AI &amp; Society. Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication, Published 08 June. DOI 10.1007/s00146-024-01987-z. EDN HSNOAJ.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <label>11</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">11.	Kitchin, R. (2017) Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication &amp; Society, 20 (1), pp. 14-29. DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <label>12</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">12.	Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S., de Vreese, C. H. (2020). In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI &amp; Society, 35(3), pp. 611-623. DOI 10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w. EDN EEIWSR.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <label>13</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">13.	Алмазов А.А., Бирюкова А.И., Власов В.В., Потапчик Е.Г., Сажина С.В., Шейман И.М., Шишкин С.В. Российское здравоохранение: перспективы развития: Доклад НИУ ВШЭ. Москва: Нац. исслед. ун-т "Высшая школа экономики", 2024. 60 с. ISBN 978-5-7598-2986-7. EDN WBQEHW.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <label>14</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">14.	Васильев Ю.А., Тыров И.А., Владзимирский А.В., Арзамасов К.М., Пестренин Л.Д., Шулькин И.М. Новая модель организации массовых профилактических исследований, основанная на автономном искусственном интеллекте для сортировки результатов флюорографии // Здоровье населения и среда обитания. 2023. Т. 31. № 11. С. 23-32. DOI 10.35627/2219-5238/2023-31-11-23-32. EDN SYIQBX.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <label>15</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">15.	Купатенко Я.Г., Мирук А.К., Ломоносова А.В., Козлова А.А. Искусственный интеллект в медицине: обзор текущей ситуации и тенденции // Cifra. Медико-биологические науки. 2024. № 2 (2). С.1-13. DOI 10.60797/BMED.2024.2.4. EDN KICZWM.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <label>16</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">16.	Крылов А.П. Использование искусственного интеллекта для анализа биомаркеров: новые горизонты персонализированной медицины // Терапевт. 2024. №7. С. 18-24. DOI 10.33920/MED-12-2407-02. EDN EAHHTV.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <label>17</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">17.	Шамшурин В.И., Шамшурина Н.Г. Социология врачебной помощи в цифровую эпоху // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2020. № 53. С. 178-187. Х/53/19. DOI 10.17223/1998863. EDN ITHRNM.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <label>18</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">18.	Кочетова Ю.Ю. Этические риски искусственного интеллекта и перспективы совместного принятия решений в медицине // Человек. 2024.Т. 35. № 3. С. 96-106. DOI 10.31857/S0236200724030065. EDN HIBCRF.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <label>19</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">19.	Углева А.В., Шилова В.А., Карпова Е.А. Индекс "этичности" систем искусственного интеллекта в медицине: от теории к практике // Этическая мысль. 2024. Т. 24. № 1. С. 144-159. DOI 10.21146/2074-4870-2024-24-1-144-159. EDN DUYXGQ.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <label>20</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">20.	Orlova et al. (2023) Opinion research among Russian Physicians on the application of technologies using artifcial intelligence in the feld of medicine and health care. BMC Health Services Research, 23, p. 749. DOI 10.1186/s12913-023-09493-6. EDN FKXJAM.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <label>21</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">21.	Wittal, C., Hammer, D., Klein,F., Rittchen, J. (2023). Perception and Knowledge of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Therapy and Diagnostics: A Population-Representative Survey. Journal of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, 6, pp. 129-139. DOI 10.26502/jbb.2642-91280077. EDN NKGCCP</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <label>22</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">22.	Mantello, P.A., Ghotbi, N., Ho, M.T., et al. (2024) Gauging public opinion of AI and emotionalized AI in healthcare: findings from a nationwide survey in Japan. AI &amp; Soc. DOI 10.1007/s00146-024-02126-4. EDN UJQTZG.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <label>23</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">23.	Liehner, G.L., Biermann, H., Hick, A., Brauner, Ph., Zieflе, M. (2023). Perceptions, Attitudes and Trust Towards Artificial Intelligence - An Assessment of the Public Opinion. Artificial Intelligence and Social Computing, 72, pp. 32-41. DOI 10.54941/ahfe1003271.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <label>24</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">24.	Gillespie, N., Lockey, S., Curtis, C., Pool, J., &amp; Akbari, A. (2023). Trust in Artificial Intelligence: A Global Study. The University of Queensland and KPMG Australia, 82 p. DOI 10.14264/00d3c94.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <label>25</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">25.	Социологический энциклопедический словарь. На русском, английском, немецком, французском и чешском языках. Редактор-координатор - академик РАН Г, В. Осипов. М. : Издательская группа ИНФРА М - НОРМА, 1998. 488 с. ISBN 5-89123-162-X. EDN TRWDJG.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <label>26</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">26.	Назаров М. М. Искусственный интеллект и алгоритмические решения в социальной сфере: представления молодёжи // Социологическая наука и социальная практика. 2023. Т. 11. № 3. С. 141-158. DOI 10.19181/snsp.2023.11.3.7. EDN PSIJNC.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <label>27</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">27.	Иванов В.Н., Насриддинов Т.Г., Мчедлова Е.М., Харченко В.С., Назаров М.М. Россияне о перспективах / Россия: центр и регионы. Сборник научных статей. Сборник научных статей. 2023. Выпуск 29. Архангельск, Северный (Арктический) федеральный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова. С. 4-117. ISBN 978-5-261-01661-8. EDN UXXLSP.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <label>28</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1.	Asan, O., Bayrak, F.M., Choudhury, A. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Human Trust in Healthcare: Focus on Clinicians. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), p. e15154. https://doi.org/10.2196/15154. https://elibrary.ru/kvosdv.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <label>29</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2.	Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quaterly, 13(3), pp. 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <label>30</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3.	Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), p. 186. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926. https://elibrary.ru/fnvbjn.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <label>31</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4.	Damerji, H., Salimi, D. (2021). Mediating effect of use perceptions on technology readiness and adoption of artificial intelligence in accounting. Accounting Education, 30 (2), pp. 107-130.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref32">
        <label>32</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2021.1872035. https://elibrary.ru/dwmkui.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref33">
        <label>33</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5.	Miltgen, L., Popovic, C., Oliveira, T. (2013). Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: Integrating the “Big 3” of technology acceptance with privacy context. Decision Support Systems, 56, pp. 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.010.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref34">
        <label>34</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6.	Choung, H., David, P., Ross, A. (2022). Trust in AI and its role in the acceptance of AI technologies. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39 (9), pp. 1727–1739. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2050543. https://elibrary.ru/cunyag.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref35">
        <label>35</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7.	Zhang, M., Luo, М., Nie, R., Zhang, Y. (2017). Technical attributes, health attribute, consumer attributes and their roles in adoption intention of healthcare wearable technology. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 108, pp. 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.09.016.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref36">
        <label>36</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8.	Gansser, O.A. Reich, C.S. (2021). A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application. Technology in Society, 65, p. 101535.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref37">
        <label>37</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101535. https://elibrary.ru/pdwhao.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref38">
        <label>38</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9.	Ghazizadeh, M., Lee, J.D., Boyle, L.N. (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to assess automation. Cognition, Technology &amp; Work, 14(1), pp. 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0194-3. https://elibrary.ru/rsypnq.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref39">
        <label>39</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10.	Koenig, P.D. (2024) Attitudes toward artificial intelligence: combining three theoretical perspectives on technology acceptance. AI &amp; Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01987-z. https://elibrary.ru/hsnoaj.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref40">
        <label>40</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11.	Kitchin, R. (2017) Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication &amp; Society, 20 (1), pp. 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref41">
        <label>41</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">12.	Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S., &amp; de Vreese, C. H. (2020). In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI &amp; Society, 35(3), pp. 611-623.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w. https://elibrary.ru/eeiwsr.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref42">
        <label>42</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">13.	 Almazov, A.A., Biryukova, A.I., Vlasov, V.V., Potapchik, E.G., Sazhina, S.V., Sheiman, I.M., Shishkin, S.V. (2024) Russian healthcare: Development Prospects: Report of the Higher School of Economics. Moscow, National Research University of Higher School of Economic. 60 p. ISBN 978-5-7598-2986-7. https://elibrary.ru/wbqehw.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref43">
        <label>43</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">14.	Vasilev, Yu.A., Tyrov, I.A., Vladzymyrskyy, A.V., Arzamasov, K.M., Pestrenin, L.D., Shulkin, I.M. (2023) A new model of organizing mass screening based on stand-alone artificial intelligence used for fluorography image triage. Public Health and Life Environment – PH&amp;LE, 31(11), pp. 23–32. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2023-31-11-23-32. https://elibrary.ru/syiqbx.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref44">
        <label>44</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">15.	Kupatenko, Y.G., Miruk, A.K., Lomonosova, A.V., Kozlova, A.A. (2024) Artificial intelligence in medicine: an overview of the current situation and tendencies. Cifra. Biomedical sciences, 2 (2), p. 4. https://doi.org/10.60797/BMED.2024.2.4. https://elibrary.ru/kiczwm.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref45">
        <label>45</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">16.	Krylov, A.P. (2024) AI in biomarkers analysis: new horizons for personalized medicine. Terapevt, 7, pp. 18-24. https://doi.org/10.33920/MED-12-2407-02. https://elibrary.ru/eahhtv.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref46">
        <label>46</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">17.	Shamshurin, V.I., Shamshurina, N.G. (2020). The sociology of medical care in the digital age. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 53, pp. 178-187. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863Х/53/19. https://elibrary.ru/ithrnm.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref47">
        <label>47</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">18.	Kochetova, Yu.Y. (2024). Ethical risks of artificial intelligence and prospects for joint decision-making in medicine. The human being, 35 (3), pp. 96-106. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0236200724030065. https://elibrary.ru/hibcrf.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref48">
        <label>48</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">19.	Ugleva, A.V., Shilova, V.A., Karpova, E.A. (2024). The index of "ethics" of artificial intelligence systems in medicine: from theory to practice. Ethical Thought, 24 (1), pp. 144-159. https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-4870-2024-24-1-144-159. https://elibrary.ru/duyxgq.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref49">
        <label>49</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">20.	Orlova et al. (2023) Opinion research among Russian Physicians on the application of technologies using artifcial intelligence in the field of medicine and health care. BMC Health Services Research, 23, p. 749. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09493-6. https://elibrary.ru/fkxjam.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref50">
        <label>50</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">21.	Wittal, C., Hammer, D., Klein,F., Rittchen, J. (2023). Perception and Knowledge of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Therapy and Diagnostics: A Population-Representative Survey. Journal of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, 6, pp. 129-139. https://doi.org/10.26502/jbb.2642-91280077. https://elibrary.ru/nkgccp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref51">
        <label>51</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">22.	Mantello, P.A., Ghotbi, N., Ho, M.T., et al. (2024) Gauging public opinion of AI and emotionalized AI in healthcare: findings from a nationwide survey in Japan. AI &amp; Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02126-4. https://elibrary.ru/ujqtzg.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref52">
        <label>52</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">23.	 Liehner, G.L., Biermann, H., Hick, A., Brauner, Ph., Zieflе, M. (2023). Perceptions, Attitudes and Trust Towards Artificial Intelligence - An Assessment of the Public Opinion. Artificial Intelligence and Social Computing, 72, pp. 32–41. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003271.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref53">
        <label>53</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">24.	Gillespie, N., Lockey, S., Curtis, C., Pool, J., Akbari, A. (2023). Trust in Artificial Intelligence: A Global Study. The University of Queensland and KPMG Australia, 82 p. https://doi.org/10.14264/00d3c94.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref54">
        <label>54</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">25.	The Sociological Encyclopedic Dictionary (1998). Available in Russian, English, German, French and Czech. The coordinating editor is Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences G. V. Osipov. Moscow, INFRA M - NORMA Publishing Group, 488 p. ISBN 5-89123-162-Х. https://elibrary.ru/trwdjg.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref55">
        <label>55</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">26.	Nazarov, M.M. (2023) Artificial Intelligence and algorithmic solutions in the social sphere: youth attitudes. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 11 (3), pp. 141-158. https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2023.11.3.7. https://elibrary.ru/psijnc.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref56">
        <label>56</label>
        <mixed-citation xml:lang="en">27.	Ivanov, V.N., Nasriddinov, T.G., Mchedlova, E.M., Kharchenko, V.S., Nazarov, M.M. (2023) Russians about prospects. Russia: Сenter and Regions. Collection of scientific articles. Arkhangelsk, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, 29, pp. 4-117. ISBN 978-5-261-01661-8. https://elibrary.ru/uxxlsp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
