The levels of digital inequality: Features of the impact in the Ural federal district
ru
Original Article|Public Management and Public Administration
AbstractFull textReferencesFilesAuthorsAltmetrics
A. A. Chizhov
Ministry of Health of the Sverdlovsk Region (34b, Wainer St., Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation)
Introduction. Access to information, digital products and services contributes to reducing barriers in individual’s interaction with state, organizations, and other individuals, also providing opportunities for human development. The author assesses the digital inequality level of the constituent entities of the Ural Federal District.

Materials and methods. Theoretically, the research is based on the concept of three levels of digital inequality, according to which inequality can be manifested at the level of access to Internet and information and communication technologies; at the level of the users’ digital skills and competencies; at the level of benefits obtained from the use of digital technologies and impacting individual life chances. The materials used are: statistical data of the Russian information society development monitoring, research on the digital literacy of the Russian population, conducted by the Analytical Center of the National Agency for Financial Research, the Russian Association of Electronic Communications, the Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Communications of the Russian Federation and the National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, as well as the results of an expert survey conducted by the author in 2023 with state civil servants of the Sverdlovsk region and employees of “Electronic government operator”, the state budgetary institution of the Sverdlovsk region.

Results. The article reveals the specific features of digital inequality of the entities of the Ural Federal District. The geographical features of the region paradoxically affects the digital inequality level. The more compactly located territories of the Sverdlovsk, Tyumen and Chelyabinsk regions provide for the appropriate infrastructure with better broadband Internet access. A social consequence of low Internet access in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug is, in part, that not all medical organizations can be connected to the Integrated National Health Information System. In addition, there is no direct correlation between Internet access and digital skills development. On the contrary, remoteness and inaccessibility of territories act as drivers for the development of digital competencies of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug and Yugra residents, who are more efficient in using digital technologies in e-commerce and public services.

Discussions and conclusions. “Bridging the Digital Divide” federal program implementation will increase the information infrastructure availability. Conscious and focused effort is required to improve digital literacy and cyber hygiene of the population.
Keywords: digital inequality, digital divide, Internet, digital assets, information and communication technologies, the Ural Federal District
УДК: 004:316
ВАК: 05.04.04, 05.02.07
ГРНТИ: 04.41.21
Article received: March 16, 2024
Article accepted: April 22, 2024
Vorobyova, I. A., & Kosterev, R. A. (2022). Digital communication in the structure of a digital society. International Research Journal, (6-4), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2022.120.6.160.
Smirnov, A. V. (2021). Digital society: Theoretical model and Russian reality. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (1), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.1.1790.
Rostovskaya, T. K., & Fomina, O. E. (2023). Analyzing dissertation research in sociology of 2012-2022 period. Management Issues, (5), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2023-5-67-81.
Gladkova, A. A., Garifullin, V. Z., & Massimo, R. (2019). Model of three levels of the digital divide: Current advantages and limitations (as exemplified by the Republic of Tatarstan). Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika, (4), 41–72. https://doi.org/10.30547/vestnik.journ.4.2019.4172.
Kostina, N. B., & Chizhov, A. A. (2022). On the issue of distinction between the concepts of “digital gap”, “digital inequality” and “digital divide”. Ufa Humanitarian Scientific Forum, (1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.47309/2713-2358_2022_56_63.
Bannykh, G. A., Kostina, S. N., Sivovolov, D. L., Tomiltsev, A. V., Rezer, T. M., & Chevtaeva, N. G. (2022). Digitalization of public administration of territories: Theory and practice. Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin. https://elibrary.ru/khrtau.
Bell, T., Aubele, J. W., & Perruso, C. (2022). Digital divide issues affecting undergraduates at a hispanic-serving institution during the pandemic: A mixed-methods approach. Education Sciences, 12(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020115.
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills. First Monday, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942.
Vassilakopoulou, P., & Hustad, E. (2021). Bridging digital divides: A literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(3), 955–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10096-3.
Kameneva, T. N., Konishcheva, E. V., & Vasilyeva, I. N. (2023). The impact of digitalization on the professional and educational activities of the subjects of the educational space of a modern university. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics, Sociology and Management, 13(1), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2023-13-1-158-168.
Velikaya, N. M., & Grebnyak, O. V. (2023). Human potential development in the context of digital transformation in modern Russia. Management Issues, (2), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2023-2-33-44.
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online?. In Communication and Information Technologies Annual (pp. 29–52). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2050-206020150000010002.
Ragnedda, M., & Kreitem, H. (2018). The three levels of digital divide in East EU countries. World of Media. Journal of Russian Media and Journalism Studies, (1). https://doi.org/10.30547/worldofmedia.4.2018.1.
Korovkin, V., Park, A., & Kaganer, E. (2022). Towards conceptualization and quantification of the digital divide. Information, Communication & Society, 26(11), 2268–2303. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2022.2085612.
Kostina, S. N., & Novikova, O. N. (2021). Digital divide in distance learning: The case of Perm krai. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Social Sciences and the Humanities, 21(3), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.14529/ssh210310.
Litvintseva, G. P., & Karelin, I. N. (2023). New types of digital markets and inequality in international trade. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences, 16(10), 1837–1845. https://elibrary.ru/ndvnmc.
Vartanova, E. L., Gladkova, A. A., Lapin, D. A., & Samorodova, E. V. (2023). Digital Inequality in The Modern Communication Space of Russia. Lomonosov Moscow State University. https://elibrary.ru/hcvbji.
Igonina, E. V., Povalyaeva, O. N., & Kotlyarova, O. A. (2022). Digital competence of Russian teachers (results of an empirical study on the example of the Lipetsk region). Perspectives of Science and Education, (6), 625–643. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.6.38.
Karasev, P. A., & Stefanovich, D. V. (2022). Cybersecurity of the critical infrastructure: New challenges. Rossia v Global’noj Politike, 20(6), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6439-2022-20-6-147-164.
Times citedRecent citationsField Citation RatioRelative Citation Ratio
© Article. A. A. Chizhov, 2024.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.