2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
Modern pension paradigm in Europe
ru
Original Article|Public Management and Public Administration
AbstractFull textReferencesFilesAuthorsAltmetrics
Vyacheslav Yu. Yarin
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (66, 8 Marta St., Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russian Federation)
Maya I. Lvova (Cand. Sci. (Economics))
Ural State University of Economics (62/45, 8 Marta/Narodnoy Voli St., Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russian Federation)
Introduction. Pension systems are a key element of social protection for the elderly. They are designed to provide senior citizens with stable income not from work. However, pension systems currently being developed in Europe are increasingly exposing the working-age population to the risk of poverty in old age. The European pension paradigm strives for an adequate level of pension payments and builds financial protection against poverty, while the future evolution of wages and prices remains unknown for Europe as a whole.
Methods. Scientific research is based on general and special methods of scientific cognition. In the process of forming the concept of the scientific article, modern scientific methods of studying economic and social phenomena were used, including methods of system-structural, functional, factorial and comparative analysis, as well as categorical, logical and structural analysis and synthesis, detailing and generalization, grouping and comparison, identification of cause-and-effect relationships. The authors proceed from an understanding of the scientific hypothesis of reforming the pension system, which ensures long-term investment by the working-age population with income in the future. The empirical base of the study was made up of current data from cross-country comparative studies of Europe in terms of typology of state pension systems.
Results. Based on the functional method of cognition, the authors of the scientific article systematize the main types of state pension systems of the European Union, representing the complex content of the indicator value of pension payments. It is noted that in the context of reforming the pension systems of the European Union countries, the reorganization of the functional and ideological components of pension provision, aimed at protecting consumers of pension savings, makes it possible to increase the socio-economic standard of living. Although EU pension systems differ in many respects, they all have one common problem - finding ways to maintain the financial sustainability of the budgetary system while paying pensions in the long term against the backdrop of an aging population and the problem of increasing the ratio of pensioners to the working-age population.
Methods. Scientific research is based on general and special methods of scientific cognition. In the process of forming the concept of the scientific article, modern scientific methods of studying economic and social phenomena were used, including methods of system-structural, functional, factorial and comparative analysis, as well as categorical, logical and structural analysis and synthesis, detailing and generalization, grouping and comparison, identification of cause-and-effect relationships. The authors proceed from an understanding of the scientific hypothesis of reforming the pension system, which ensures long-term investment by the working-age population with income in the future. The empirical base of the study was made up of current data from cross-country comparative studies of Europe in terms of typology of state pension systems.
Results. Based on the functional method of cognition, the authors of the scientific article systematize the main types of state pension systems of the European Union, representing the complex content of the indicator value of pension payments. It is noted that in the context of reforming the pension systems of the European Union countries, the reorganization of the functional and ideological components of pension provision, aimed at protecting consumers of pension savings, makes it possible to increase the socio-economic standard of living. Although EU pension systems differ in many respects, they all have one common problem - finding ways to maintain the financial sustainability of the budgetary system while paying pensions in the long term against the backdrop of an aging population and the problem of increasing the ratio of pensioners to the working-age population.
Keywords: pension provision, investment, government spending, pension system reform, pension savings, pension payments
УДК: 349.3(4)
ВАК: 05.02.04
ГРНТИ: 06.73.02
Article received: April 06, 2024
Article accepted: July 23, 2024
Guardiancich, I., Guidi, M., & Terlizzi, A. (2022). Beyond the European Semester: The supranational evaluation cycle for pensions. Journal of European Social Policy, 32(5), 578–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287221101339.
Heer, B., Polito, V., & Wickens, M. (2023). Pension Systems (Un)Sustainability and Fiscal Constraints: A Comparative Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal, Article 4472931. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4472931.
Hinrichs, K. (2021). Recent pension reforms in Europe: More challenges, new directions. An overview. Social Policy & Administration, 55(3), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12712.
Martini, A. (2021). Socially responsible investing: from the ethical origins to the sustainable development framework of the European Union. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(11), 16874–16890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01375-3.
Elkamhi, R., Lee, J., & Sadik, S. (2019). Bridging the Gap between Strategic Allocation and Investment Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal, Article 3454958. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3454958.
Bekbossinova, A. S., Oshanova, K. Y., Khassenova, K. K., Alpysbayeva, A. K., & Moldasheva, A. B. (2022). Advantages and disadvantages of early withdrawal of pension savings: An expert assessment. Economy: Strategy and Practice, 17(3), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2022-3-242-258.
Frumina, S. V. (2021). Analysis of the Danish pension system. Finance and Credit, 27(8), 1852–1870. https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.27.8.1852.
Dybał, M. (2023). Participatory budgeting: Is it a useful tool towards co-creation of public services. Ekonomia, 28(2), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.19195/2658-1310.28.2.4.
Knyazeva, E. G., & Yarin, V. Yu. (2023). Pension reserves as foresight projects of portfolio savings. Financial Economics, (3), 119–124. https://elibrary.ru/fjltkz.
Kapranova, L. D. (2020). Non-state pension provision in the implementation of the state’s socio-economic policy. National Interests: Priorities and Security, 16(3), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.16.3.449.
Yuzvovich, L. I., Lvova, M. I., & Yarin, V. Yu. (2023). Formation of a pension portfolio based on modeling the structure of pension savings. Finance and Credit, 29(9), 1973–1995. https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.29.9.1973.
Pinigina, V. V., & Stepanova, N. V. (2022). Analysis of the results of investing pension savings of non-state pension funds. In I. I. Ivanovskaya, & M. V. Posnova (Eds.) Digital Transformation: Trends, Problems, Solutions (pp. 29–33). Novaya Nauka. https://elibrary.ru/knmuld.
Fokina, O. G. (2023). Relevance and potential of involvement of banks in the processes of formation of the population’s own pension capital. In S. N. Orlov, & O. E. Vasilyeva (Eds.) National Ecosystems (pp. 622–627). Kurgan State University. https://elibrary.ru/hmnwje.
Masterov, A. I. (2021). Problems and prospects for the development of the pension system in Russia. Finance and Credit, 27(11), 2548–2574. https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.27.11.2548.
Kuznetsova, N. A., Ryabova, O. A., & Runov, A. V. (2020). Current problems of reforming the pension system in the post-Soviet space. Modern Science, (5-2), 131–135. https://elibrary.ru/mpbsqy.
Khmelevskaya, S. A., & Esaulkova, T. S. (2021). In search of a new configuration of the Russian pension system: Reforming the funded pension institution. Public Administration Issues, (4), 36–65. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2021-0-4-36-65.
Yarovaya, E. S. (2022). Ecosystem of non-state pension funds: A fashionable trend or a strategic necessity?. Finance and Credit, 28(3), 597–627. https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.28.3.597.
Masterov, A. I. (2022). Pension provision for self-employed citizens: Problems and ways to solve them. National Interests: Priorities and Security, 18(1), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.18.1.177.
Dor, A. B., Florig, S., Guan, J., & Zeng, X. (2021). Beta Instability and Implications for Hedging Systematic Risk: Takeaways from the COVID-19 Crisis. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 47(6), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2021.1.233.
De Spiegeleer, J., Höcht, S., Jakubowski, D., Reyners, S., & Schoutens, W. (2021). ESG: A new dimension in portfolio allocation. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(2), 827–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1923336.
© Article. Oscar A. Molina, Vyacheslav Yu. Yarin, Maya I. Lvova, Larisa I. Yuzvovich, 2024.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.