Decentralized major renovation funds’ accumulation: Aspect of stakeholder interactions
ru
Original Article|Economics and Management
AbstractFull textReferencesFilesAuthorsAltmetrics
Introduction. The purpose of this study is a systematic analysis of the stakeholder relations on the issue of the formation and management of decentralized capital repair funds. The high social significance of capital repairs of residential real estate, coupled with a high degree of wear and tear, determines the need for coordinated and effective stakeholder interaction, the involvement of public authorities in co-financing expenses and the development of effective mechanisms for the rational allocation of funds from decentralized capital repair funds formed in special accounts in banking organizations and protecting them from inflationary processes.
Materials and methods. The authors explore institutional factors in the implementation of major renovations of apartment buildings, identify the key stakeholders of these processes, their interests and risks, and reveal the presence of an agency problem. Based on statistical data and regulations, the authors conduct economic modeling of the formation of a decentralized capital repair fund using the example of an existing homeowners' association, and calculate target indicators for the efficiency of capital repair fund management.
Results. The conducted research revealed inconsistency of the current management approaches and the impossibility of forming major overhaul funds in sufficient size to replace elevator equipment after the shelf life expiry without external financing. The authors conduct a study of the agency problem that arises when managing funds placed in special accounts for major overhaul, and identify the presence of informal institutional factors that prevent the formation of a "mature real estate owner".
Discussion. Based on the results of the study, the authors proposed regulatory measures that could positively affect the effectiveness of relations on the issue of formation and management of decentralized capital repair funds. In addition to regulatory measures, the authors consider it necessary to involve municipal deputies in awareness-raising activities aimed at creating a “mature property owner.” The scientific novelty of this study consists in the development of management and regulation methods for the formation of decentralized capital repair funds on the basis of the synthesis of stakeholder and institutional approaches.
Materials and methods. The authors explore institutional factors in the implementation of major renovations of apartment buildings, identify the key stakeholders of these processes, their interests and risks, and reveal the presence of an agency problem. Based on statistical data and regulations, the authors conduct economic modeling of the formation of a decentralized capital repair fund using the example of an existing homeowners' association, and calculate target indicators for the efficiency of capital repair fund management.
Results. The conducted research revealed inconsistency of the current management approaches and the impossibility of forming major overhaul funds in sufficient size to replace elevator equipment after the shelf life expiry without external financing. The authors conduct a study of the agency problem that arises when managing funds placed in special accounts for major overhaul, and identify the presence of informal institutional factors that prevent the formation of a "mature real estate owner".
Discussion. Based on the results of the study, the authors proposed regulatory measures that could positively affect the effectiveness of relations on the issue of formation and management of decentralized capital repair funds. In addition to regulatory measures, the authors consider it necessary to involve municipal deputies in awareness-raising activities aimed at creating a “mature property owner.” The scientific novelty of this study consists in the development of management and regulation methods for the formation of decentralized capital repair funds on the basis of the synthesis of stakeholder and institutional approaches.
Keywords: stakeholder approach, agency problem, housing and communal services, residential property management, major repairs
Funding
The study was supported by the USUE within the framework of the grant (terms of reference) TZ-5.2022/1
УДК: 332.8
ВАК: 05.02.06
ГРНТИ: 06.56.31
Article received: February 22, 2024
Article accepted: April 14, 2024
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.2307/258888.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247.
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility and Access to Finance. SSRN Electronic Journal, Article 1847085. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1847085.
Gupta, K., Crilly, D., & Greckhamer, T. (2020). Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 41(10), 1869–1900. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3204.
Henisz, W. J., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. J. (2013). Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement: Financial Returns to Stakeholder Engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), 1727–1748. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2180.
Jones, T. M., Harrison, J. S., & Felps, W. (2018). How Applying Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Can Provide Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 43(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0111.
Petrov, M. A. (2004). Stakeholder theory: Ways of practical application. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management, (2), 51–67. https://elibrary.ru/hspjcd.
Tambovtsev, V. L. (2008). Stakeholder theory of the firm in the light of the concept of ownership regimes. Russian Management Journal, 6(3), 3–26. https://elibrary.ru/jwtgzd.
Ivashkovskaya, I. V. (2012). Stakeholder Approach to Value Based Management. Journal of Corporate Finance Research, 6(1), 14–23. https://elibrary.ru/ozzhej.
Vashakmadze, T. T., Martirosyan, E. G., & Sergeeva, A. A. (2013). Stakeholder Based Framework for M&A Management. Journal of Corporate Finance Research, 7(2), 78–86. https://elibrary.ru/qypmrz.
Dolmatova, I. N. (2013). Corporate management based on stakeholder approach the experience of the non-public companies. Management Sciences, (2), 18–26. https://elibrary.ru/qccumr.
Kogdenko, V. G. (2018). Investigating company risks within the framework of the stakeholder approach to analysis. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 17(6), 1051–1072. https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.17.6.1051.
Zlygostev, A. A. (2020). Stakeholder Value: Understanding and Evaluation. Theoretical Economy, (8), 92–105. https://elibrary.ru/lktlph.
Tkachenko, I. N., & Zlygostev, A. A. (2022). Stakeholder risk research tools in the light of companies’ sustainable development. Journal of New Economy, 23(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2022-23-1-6.
Ramenskaya, L. A. (2021). Interaction between digital platforms and key stakeholders: A content analysis. The Manager, 12(5), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-5-7.
Kravchenko, E. Yu., Bolotova, I. S., & Kulabukhov, V. R. (2023). Systematization of forms and tools for the implementation of corporate social responsibility. Bulletin of the Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law, (1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.21295/2223-5639-2023-1-79-89.
Gabduldayanova, R. K., & Fomina, E. A. (2023). Stakeholder approach to increasing the efficiency of company management. Economics and Management: Research and Practice Journal, (1), 94–97. https://doi.org/10.34773/EU.2023.1.15.
Rodnyansky, D. V., & Paley, T. F. (2023). Collective strategies as a tool for harmonizing interests of key industry stakeholders (case study of oil companies). Social and Economic Systems, (2-1), 262–275. https://elibrary.ru/cyfpqb.
Plakhin, A. E. (2018). The method of determining the asymmetry of the distribution of income of stakeholders of the industrial park structures. Bulletin of NGIEI, (10), 97–108. https://elibrary.ru/ymzyax.
Boykova, E. N. (2015). Methods of determination of the level of balancing of the stakeholders’ interests in the corporate governance system. Management Sciences in the Modern World, 1(1), 304–307. https://elibrary.ru/vpwoah.
Samosudov, M. V. (2012). The theory of corporate interaction as a tool for analysis in the corporate governance process. Management Sciences, (2), 24–30. https://elibrary.ru/qccudv.
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder Influence Strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205. https://elibrary.ru/dbadlb.
Petrov, M. A. (2004). Stakeholder theory: Ways of practical application. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management, (2), 51–67. https://elibrary.ru/hspjcd.
Kleiner, G. B. (2011). Resource theory of systemic organization of the economy. Russian Management Journal, 9(3), 3–28. https://elibrary.ru/oihbxl.
Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910. https://elibrary.ru/crihol.
Grishkova, N. S., & Nizhegorodtsev, R. M. (2017). On the government regulation of the enterprises of housing and communal services. RISK: Resources, Information, Supply, Competition, (4), 136–139. https://elibrary.ru/ytctfb.
Grishkova, N. S. (2015). Features of functioning of and communal services as an element of social infrastructure of the region. Bulletin of Adygea State University. Economics, (2), 179–185. https://elibrary.ru/ujfcsz.
Smirnyagin, N. S. (2022). The role of stakeholders in the production of housing and communal services. Russian Economic Bulletin, 5(3), 193–199. https://elibrary.ru/ynuzyj.
Savvina, I. S. (2023). Substantiation of the problems of development of housing and communal services in Russia. Economics of Construction, (7), 25–29. https://elibrary.ru/taebdl.
Provotorov, I. A., Kudryavtseva, I. S., & Pereslavtseva, I. I. (2022). Increasу in energy efficiency in the context of digital transformation of the housing and communal services sector. Housing and Utilities Infrastructure, (4), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.36622/VSTU.2022.23.4.012.
Tkachenko, I. N., & Chechulin, I. A. (2024). Crisis resilience assessment and management of public utility companies. Journal of New Economy, 25(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2024-25-1-7.
Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What Are Institutions. Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879.
Hodgson, G. M. (2015). On defining institutions: rules versus equilibria. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(3), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137415000028.
Fleetwood, S. (2008). Institutions and Social Structures. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(3), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00370.x.
Faghih, N., & Samadi, A. H. (2024). An Introduction to Institutional Inertia-Theory and Evidence. In Institutional Inertia (pp. 1–16). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51175-2_1.
Rosenbaum, E. (2021). Mental models and institutional inertia. Journal of Institutional Economics, 18(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/s174413742100059x.
Samadi, A. H., Raanaei, A., & Panahi, M. (2024). Cognitive Inertia as a Fundamental Cause of Institutional Inertia. In Institutional Inertia (pp. 155–172). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51175-2_7.
Kuznetsov, I. A., Shevyakov, A. Yu., & Kulikova, Ya. A. (2023). The consumer economic security in housing with the mass introduction of energy efficiency technologies in apartment buildings. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences, 16(10), 1863–1874. https://elibrary.ru/quyylv.
Chechulin, I. A., & Tkachenko, I. N. (2023). Crisis adaptation management of small utility enterprises, through the introduction of intelligent metering devices. Waste and Resources, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.15862/45ECOR123.
Larin, S. N., Gerasimova, E. V., & Stebenyaeva, T. V. (2015). Ways of effective improvement of the housing and utilities sector through implementation of new organizational and economic mechanisms for interaction of institutional agents. National Interests: Priorities and Security, 11(20), 14–25. https://elibrary.ru/rwwlhv.
Safronova, N. B., & Budakov, A. S. (2019). Economic features and mechanisms of energy saving management in housing and utility sector. RUDN Journal of Economics, 27(4), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2019-27-4-645-662.
Barbashova, N. E. (2021). Does intergovernmental equalization create disincentives for regional infrastructural development?. Finance: Theory and Practice, 25(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-1-22-34.
Nureyev, R. M., & Gulyaeva, O. A. (2021). Institutional Analysis of Housing in Russia. Terra Economicus, 19(2), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2021-19-2-39-57.
Tambovtsev, V. L., & Rozhdestvenskaya, I. A. (2020). Strategic planning theory: An institutional perspective. Terra Economicus, 18(2), 22–48. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-2-22-48.
Tambovtsev, V. L., & Rozhdestvenskaya, I. A. (2018). Institutional planning theory as a general planning theory: Status and possible development. Terra Economicus, 16(2), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.23683/2073-6606-2018-16-2-27-45.
Ermishina, A. V. (2022). Digitalization in the organizing of apartment building major renovation in Russia. Journal of Economic Regulation, 13(4), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.17835/2078-5429.2022.13.4.108-115.
© Article. Irina N. Tkachenko, Ivan A. Chechulin, 2024.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.