Bureaucratization as a social problem of modern comprehensive school
ru
Original Article|Corporate Management
AbstractFull textReferencesFilesAuthorsAltmetrics
Sergey V. Egoryshev (Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Full Professor)
Institute for Strategic Studies of the Republic of Bashkortostan (15, Kirov St., Ufa, Bashkortostan, 450008, Russian Federation)
Introduction. The article features the results of a sociological study conducted under the author’s guidance, by the sociologists of the Institute for Strategic Studies of the Republic of Bashkortostan, in 2022 in the regional schools in preparation of the Parliamentary hearings in the State Assembly - Kurultai of the Republic of Bashkortostan, on improving the regulatory and legal support of professional activities in the republican education system. The purpose of the research was to identify and analyze the social problems faced today by the general education school and the main subjects interacting in it - students and teachers, as well as to determine the effectiveness of the socio-legal mechanisms used by education authorities to minimize and resolve these problems. The study showed that one of the main such problems is the bureaucratization of school management, which determines the manifestation and severity of many other problems, which naturally affects the decline in the quality of the educational process.

Materials and methods. Methodologically, in the course of the study, approaches were used that have developed in such modern branches of sociological knowledge as the sociology of management and the sociology of education. The information base of the article was made up of official statistics and the results of a sociological survey conducted through the method of online questioning among 4529 teachers, which accounted for 14% of their total number in the region. The respondents represented 4 groups of schools depending on their location (the city of Ufa, other republican cities, centers, municipalities and rural schools).

Results. An analysis of literature and the results of a sociological study conducted under the author’s guidance, led to the conclusion that the manifestations of bureaucratization, expressed in an excessive strengthening of administrative control over school life, in an increase in the volume and number of reporting forms, in frequent distractions of teachers from performing the direct functions of teaching and upbringing, are noticeably reflected in the decline in the quality of the educational process, substitute its creative potential for administration, and ultimately limit the role of school in socializing younger generation. School management practices used today do not contribute to solving this topical problem.

Discussion. The conservative nature of the education system itself and, above all, its school subsystem contributes to the preservation of this situation. Due to quite a number of outdated traditions and stereotypes, any changes that reflect urgent social needs and civilizational trends can only be felt in the long term. In addition, there is no permanent feedback mechanism between the school and education authorities, the basis of which is sociological monitoring of the causes of the emergence, the dynamics of the manifestation of social problems and the effectiveness of measures to influence them.
Keywords: sociology of education, Russian comprehensive school, Republic of Bashkortostan, teachers, students, professional activity issues, bureaucratization, sociological research
Funding
The article was prepared as part of the state task of the ISS SBSI AS RB.
УДК: 316.74:37
ВАК: 05.04.07
ГРНТИ: 04.51.53
Article received: August 03, 2023
Article accepted: September 26, 2023
Filippov, F. R. (1980). Sociology of Education. Publishing house “Nauka”. https://elibrary.ru/vlvwai.
— Нечаев В.Я. Социология образования. М.: Издательство Московского государственного университета. 1992. 200 с.
Osipov, A. M., & Matveeva, N. A. (2009). Sociology of education in Russia: “working on mistakes” at the beginning of the 21st century. Higher Education in Russia, (9), 36–42. https://elibrary.ru/kvubmp.
Kurilovich, N. V. (2011). Theoretical and methodological problems of the contemporary sociology of education. Philosophy and Social Sciences, (3-4), 66–70. https://elibrary.ru/dcbziy.
Shmankevich, T. Yu. (2012). The sociology of education and the sociology of school. What is the difference?. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Episode 12. Psychology. Sociology. Pedagogy, (2), 286–291. https://elibrary.ru/ozggfd.
Demyanov, E. I. (2014). Theoretical foundations for studying interactions in the educational space. In E. V. Pryamikova, & S. V. Franz (Eds.) Educational space of the school: experience of sociological research (pp. 33–47). Ural State Pedagogical University. https://elibrary.ru/zdcdht.
— Левко А.И. Социальные проблемы образования: история и современность. В 2 ч. – Минск: Национальный институт образования Министерства образования Беларуси. 1993. Ч.2. 194 с.
Akulich, M. M. (2016). Contradictions and conflicts of the contemporary Russian education. RUDN Journal OF Sociology, 16(1), 175–188. https://elibrary.ru/vnvpvx.
Balynskaya, N. R., Zinovieva, E. G., & Usmanova, E. G. (2019). Practical mechanisms of implementation of public administration in the sphere of education. Management Issues, (2), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2019-2-140-147.
Egoryshev, S. V., & Egorysheva, E. A. (2023). Social problems of professional activities in evaluations of public opinion of teachers in the Republic of Bashkortostan (by the materials of the 2020 sociological research). Bulletin of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Social and Economic Sciences, (2), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9354/2023.2.3.
Stol, A. V. (2022). Quality and factors of economic growth of the largest non-capital aglomerations in Russia. Ufa Humanitarian Scientific Forum, (2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.47309/2713-2358_2022_2_153_163.
Kondratyev, V. P. (2017). The concept of bureaucracy: Sociological aspect. Civil Service, 19(6), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2017-19-6-6-10.
Osipov, A. M. (2020). Bureaupathology in modern Russian education. In V. A. Mansurov (Ed.) Sociology and Society: Traditions and Innovations in the Social Development of Regions (pp. 4208–4221). Russian Society of Sociologists. https://doi.org/10.19181/kongress.2020.496.
Kravtsov, S. S., & Krylova, N. B. (2010). Bureaucratization of the school. Public Education, (9), 83–91. https://elibrary.ru/mziwdt.
Osipov, A. M., Matveev, V. V., Matveeva, N. A., & Vorontsova, T. I. (2021). School administrators: Agents and victims of paper pressure. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, (9), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250014215-9.
Polutin, S. V., & Manannikova, Yu. V. (2020). Processes of bureaucratization and de-bureaucratization of teaching work and their impact on the quality of teachers’ professional activities: Results of a sociological project. Integration of Education, 24(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.098.024.202001.075-097.
Weber, M. (2016). Economy and Society: Essays on Understanding Sociology. Sociology. National Research University “Higher School of Economics”. https://elibrary.ru/xzyved.
Alpidovskaya, M. L. (2007). M. Weber’s concept of rational bureaucracy in industrial society. Bulletin of the Financial Academy, (2), 82–89. https://elibrary.ru/ibvjgj.
Ogoltsova, E. G., & Kosyakova, P. S. (2022). The phenomenon of bureaucracy in the works of M. Weber. Young Scientist, (50), 459–461. https://elibrary.ru/prsfhx.
— Мертон Р. Социальная структура и аномия / Социология преступности (Современные буржуазные теории) / Пер. с фр. Е.А. Самарской, ред. перевода М.Н. Грецкий. М.: Изд-во «Прогресс», 1966. С. 299-313.
— Мертон Р. Социальная теория и социальная структура / Пер. с англ. Е.Н. Егоровой и др., науч. ред. З.В. Кочанова. М.: АСТ «Хранитель», 2006. 873 с.
— Квитко В.А. Ловушки для Ума и Сердца. СПб.: Летний сад, 2001. 158 с.
— Мудрость России / Авторы-составители Кожевников А.Ю., Линдберг Т.Б. СПб.: Изд. дом «Нева», 2005. 544 с.
Popov, D. S., Strelnikova, A. V., & Grigorieva, E. A. (2023). Russian high school teachers in the face of ongoing technological change: Heading towards a new luddism?. Sociological Journal, 29(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2023.29.1.3.
— Сапрыкина Д.И., Волохович А.А. Проблемы перехода на дистанционное обучение в Российской Федерации глазами учителей. М.: НИУ ВШЭ, 2020. 32 с.
Radina, N. K., & Balakina, Yu. V. (2021). Challenges for education during the pandemic: An overview of literature. Educational Studies. Moscow, (1), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-178-194.
Egoryshev, S. V. (2023). Emotional burnout of teachers as a factor of their professional inefficiency. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 23(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2023-23-1-61-73.
Times citedRecent citationsField Citation RatioRelative Citation Ratio
© Article. Sergey V. Egoryshev, 2023.